Powered by Cabanova
THE BELOW LETTER WAS WRITTEN BEFORE UNRAVELING THE KING OF DEMONS SERIAL KILLER BOYDEN GRAY CRIMINALLY INSANE HATE CRIME ADMINISTRATION. HE USES JUDGES AS PART OF HIS CRIME NETWORK. SEE: http://www.ratical.org/ratville/CAH/hijakjustice.html The Federalist Society, a Right-wing network of lawyers, judges and supporters, undoing civil rights and other gains made through the courts. ALSO, SEE SERIAL KILLER: Boyden Gray Address at the 2007 National Lawyers Convention 11-15-07 Opening remarks at the 2007 Annual National Lawyers Convention by Federalist Society Executive Vice President Leonard A. Leo followed by an address by Ambassador C. Boyden Gray http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=8691590749515004704 March 7, 2007 To: Members of Congress Independent Ministers Across The Country Chief Judge Judith Kaye 230 Park Avenue, Suite 826 New York City, New York 10169-0007 John Conyers, Committee on the Judiciary US House of Representatives Washington Office 2426 RHOB Washington, D.C. 20515-2214 Maxine Waters, Committee on the Judiciairy US House of Representatives 2138 Rayburn House Office Building Washington, DC 20515 Charles Schumer U.S. Senator 757 Third Avenue New York, New York 10017 Hillary Clinton, U.S. Senator 780 3rd Avenue New York, New York 10017 Robert Johnson Bronx District Attorney 198 East 161st Bronx, New York 10451 Andrew Cuomo, NYS Attorney General 120 Broadway New York, New York 10271 NYC Mayor Bloomberg 100 Church Street New York, New York 10007 Rose Gill Hearn, Commissioner City of New York Department of Investigation 80 Maiden Lane New York, New York 10038 Mr. Emery, Administrator New York State Commission on Judicial Conduct 61 Broadway New York, New York 1006 Alberto Gonzalez, Attorney General US Department of Justice 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20530-0001 Second Circuit Court of Appeals Office of Legal Affairs Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse New York, New York 10007 Jonathan Lippman Defrauding Chief Administrative Judge Office of Court Administration 25 Beaver Street New York, New York 10004-2982 RE: VERIFIED CRIMINAL COMPLAINT /AFFIDAVIT OF TRUTH WITH EVIDENCE, AGAINST JONATHAN LIPPMAN’S TRESPASS AS A NYS CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE AND HIS DOCUMENTED CRIMINAL REPITITIOUS, PATTERN AND PRACTICED LAWLESS USURPATIONS, USURPING POWER HE DOES NOT LEGITIMATELY POSSESS AND THE DISREGARD OF SUCH, EFFECTUATING THE BELOW JONATHAN LIPPMAN GLOBAL ODIOUS CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY AND AGAINST EQUAL PROTECTIONS EMBEDDED IN GOD GIVEN AND CONSTITUTIONAL PUBLIC SAFETY RIGHTS: • DOCUMENTED CONSPIRACY TO OFFEND AND DEFRAUD THE UNITED STATES, ( 18 USC SEC 371), EX:THE BELOW MENTIONED LEVENSON MATTER, JONATHAN LIPPMAN’S UNCONSTITUTIONAL INVALID RULE 127, HIS APPEAL, HIS RULINGS IN CONFLICT WITH THE SUPREMACY CLAUSE, UNCONSTITUIONAL USURPED COURT AND LEGISLATIVE POWERS AND THE ATTACHED PATHOGEN PROGRAMS LISTED UNDER JONATHAN LIPPMAN’S NAME AND TITLE AS A PHENOMENON, •PERJURY AGAINST HIS OATH OF OFFICE BY SUBSCRIBING TO A MATERIAL HE KNOWS TO BE FALSE, ( 18 USC SEC. 1621), EX: JONATHAN LIPPMAN’S APPEAL IN THE LEVENSON MATTER, • I NSURRECTION AGAINST THE CONSTITUTION BY INCITING, ASSISTING, AND ENGAGING IN REBELLION AGAINST THE CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITY OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ( 18 USC SEC 2383) EX: JONATHAN LIPPMAN’S RULE 127.B, HIS AMENDMENT, HIS APPEAL AND RULINGS IN THE ATTACHMENTS, JONATHAN LIPPMAN’S ATTACHED PUBLIC REDORD APPELLATE DIVISION DOCUMENTED LAWLESS USURPATIONS, • SEDITION/SEDITIOUS CONSPIRACY BY CONSPIRING TO OVERTHROW THE CONSTITUTIONAL GOVERNMENT OR DELAY THE EXECUTION OF A LAW OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ( 18 USC SEC 2384 ) EX: JONATHAN LIPPMAN’S RULE 127.B, HIS LAWLESSLY USURPED AND UNCONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT, APPEAL AND RULINGS IN THE ATTACHMENTS, JONATHAN LIPPMAN’S ATTACHED PUBLIC RECORD LAWLESS USURPATIONS AND APPEAL, •IMPEDING DUE EXERCISE OF RIGHTS BY ATTEMPTING TO PREVENT, OBSTRUCT, IMPEDE, AND INTERFERE WITH SAME, (18 USC SEC 1509) EX: JONATHAN LIPPMAN’S LAWLESS USURPATION LAWLESSLY IMPEDED AND OBSTRUCTED THE ASISTANCE OF COUNSELCONSTITUTIONALLY REQUIRED PROGRAM AND PAYMENT PLAN, • SUBORNATION OF PERJURY BY PROCURING ANOTHER TO COMMIT PERJURY ,(18 USC SEC. 1622 ) EX: JONATHAN LIPPMAN ENJOINING SUBORDINATE JUDGES IN HIS LEGAL FICTION ADMINISTRATION VIA ENFORCING HIS PUBLIC DISTURBANCE UNAUTHORIZED LAWLESS USURPED UNCONSTITUTIONAL RULE 127, WITH NO CONSTITUTIONAL VALIDITY EFFECTUATING MULTIPLE PUBLIC PROTEST LAWSUITS CONSOLIDATED INTO THE LEVENSON MATTER, •FRAUD BY A JUDGE BY MAKING A FALSE REPRESENTATION, WRITING A FALSE DOCUMENT OR HAVING KNOWLEDGE THAT A DOCUMENT IS FALSE, MAKING A FALSE DECLARATION BEFORE A UNITED STATES COURT (18 USC SEC 1623) , EX: JONATHAN LIPPMAN’S APPEAL IN THE LEVENSON MATTER, •RACKETEERING BY CONDUCTING AN ONGOING ENTERPRISE OF BRIBERY, EXTORTION, OR THREATS OF SAME, (18 U.S.C. SEC. 1962) ; EX: JONATHAN LIPPMAN’S SECOND CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS DECISION IN CONFLICT WITH THE SUPREMACY CLAUSE AND THE ATTACHED PATHOGENIC RACQUETEERING ENTERPRISES LISTED UNDER HIS NAME, • CONSPIRACY AGAINST RIGHTS OF SOVERIEGN, FREE, GOD CREATED, CITIZENS, ( 18, SECTION 241 )EX: OVER 13 MILLION DEADHERE AND ABROAD UNDER HIS NAME AND PATHOGENIC LEADERSHIP, PUBLIC PROTESTS VIA MULTIPLE LAWSUITS FILED AGAINST JONATHAN LIPPMAN’S USURPED UNCONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT, CONSOLIDATED INTO THE LEVENSON LAW SUIT, • U.S. CODE TITLE 10, SECTION 333, INTERFERENCE WITH STATE AND FEDERAL LAWS, EX: THE DISREGARD OF JONATHAN LIPPMAN’S DOCUMENTED PUBLIC RECORD LAWLESS USURPED PUBLIC DISTURBANCE UNAUTHORIZED AMENDMENT WHICH EFFECTUATED MULTIPLE PUBLIC PROTEST LAWSUITS AND DISTURBANCES IS A DIRECT INTERFERENCE AND OBSTRUCTION OF STATE AND FEDERAL LAWS. THE LACK OF CONSTITUTIONAL EQUAL PROTECTIONS HAS EFFECTUATED OVER 13 MILLION INNOCENT PEOPLE DEAD UNDER A JONATHAN LIPPMAN TITLED PHENOMENON. JONATHAN LIPPMAN’S FICTIONAL ADMINISTRATION, COUPLED WITH LAWLESS UNRESTRAINED USURPATIONS, IS AN OBSTRUCTION WITH STATE AND FEDERAL LAWS AND HAS CAUSED PUBLIC DISTURBANCE MULTIPLE LAWSUITS. THE DISREGARD OF SUCH, AS WELL AS THE DISREGARD OF EQUAL PROTECTIONS SECURED BY GOD AND THE CONSTITUTION REQUIRE INTERVENTION, • ADVOCATING OVERTHROW OF GOVERNMENT, (18 U.S.C. SEC. 1962) EX: JONATHAN LIPPMAN’S APPEAL, RULINGS, LAWLESS PUBLIC RECORD DOCUMENTED USURPATIONS AND AMMENDMENTS WITH NO CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITY IN THE ATTACHED LEVENSON MATTER AND ATTACHMENTS, •GENOCIDE ; ( B) CONSPIRACY TO COMMIT GENOCIDE; (C) DIRECT AND PUBLIC INCITEMENT TO COMMIT GENOCIDE; (D) ATTEMPT TO COMMIT GENOCIDE; (E) COMPLICITY IN GENOCIDE, EXAMPLE: THE ATTACHED GENOCIDAL DEADLY PATHOGEN PROGRAMS LISTED UNDER JONATHAN LIPPMAN’S NAME AND TITLE AS PHENOMENON COMMITTED WITH INTENT TO DEFRAUD AND DESTROY, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, A NATIONAL, ETHNICAL, RACIAL OR RELIGIOUS GROUP AS SUCH: (A) KILLING MEMBERS OF THE GROUP; (B) CAUSING SERIOUS BODILY OR MENTAL HARM TO MEMBERS OF THE GROUP; (C) DELIBERATELY INFLICTING ON THE GROUP CONDITIONS OF LIFE CALCULATED TO BRING ABOUT ITS PHYSICAL DESTRUCTION IN WHOLE OR IN PART; (D) IMPOSING MEASURES INTENDED TO PREVENT BIRTHS WITHIN THE GROUP; Dear Public Officials: THIS Criminal Complaint Truth Affidavit is written pursuant to Almighty God the Creator God given rights so all people can live free from public record documented Jonathan Lippman, NYS Chief Administrative Judicial Trespasser criminal, seditious, odious scourge, usurpations MANDATING, REQUIRING, AUTHORIZING, his arrest, removal, and impeachment, accordingly. Jonathan Lippman’s heinous crimes, criminal usurpations, legal fiction administration, persistent and willful insurrection and rebellion against the New York and the United States of America Constitutions effectuated a deadly Public Defraud requiring his arrest as his actions and the attachments attached hereto epitomize his high misdemeanors, felonies, malfeasance in office and are documented public atrocities with genocidal and deadly power and control ramifications. See attached. Above all, I am filing this Criminal Complaint Truth Affidavit against Jonathan Lippman with particularity to the fact that all persons are born equally free, and have certain natural, inherent and inalienable rights, among which are the rights of enjoying and defending life and liberty, of acquiring, possessing and protecting property, and of seeking and obtaining safety and happiness. These God given rights have been LAWLESSLY obstructed via lawless disregarded life threatening usurpations inflicted on humankind near and far. These crimes are documented in the above and below offices and documented in the public record of the below mentioned law suit. This Criminal Complaint Truth Affidavit is written with emphasis on TRUTHFUL DOCUMENTATION OF JONATHAN LIPPMAN’S verifiable crimes that defrauded and OVER THREW the United States system of government, for his power craze personal gain while trespassing as a judge in the law suit against him titled 1 NO. 1: LEONARD J. LEVENSON, ET AL. V. JONATHAN LIPPMAN,&C., ET AL. This criminal complaint is written on behalf of the people of New York State, Africa, and the sacredness of the protections guaranteed by God, to live free from lawless Jonathan Lippman usurpations and public disturbances, that obstruct justice, terrorize countries and people, as well as kill under varied disguises cited in the multiple documentaries I have written that are filed in the NYC FBI office, Chief Justice Judith Kaye’s office, and The Department of Investigations under NYC Mayor Bloomberg’s office via Rose Hearn, Commissioner. Additionally, I have attached evidence verifying the above Jonathan Lippman criminal activities, premised off of lawless disregarded public disturbance usurpations and his unregulated 2 billion dollar budget that facilitates such. I have been terrorized, denied all aspects of equal protection of the law, targeted for a disguised killing/wiped off this earth via lawless Jonathan Lippman documented patterned and practiced criminal usurpations, consistent with his patterns of lawless court administration, union interference, public education usurpations. Usurpations that have wiped out over 13 million people are listed under his name. His lawless usurpations including his public record Appellate Division documented lawless usurpation require arrest and additional charges for the disregard and seditious/defraud appeal. See attachments. For the last 13 years I have vigilantly fought off Jonathan Lippman’s persistent, malicious, lawless, lethal, documented usurpation pattern and practices that could have left me dead under several disguises and multiple times. The documentation of his criminal usurpations by the NYS Appellate Division is in God’s order, was authorized and is needed. Additionally, the Documentaries I have forwarded to authorities regarding Jonathan Lippman’s patterned public record lawless usurpations require an end to the disregard of his documented criminal usurpations, as over 13 million people are dead under his lawless public record usurpation patterns, that are listed under his name. Foremost, this Criminal Complaint Truth Affidavit is mainly for his documented criminal unconstitutional usurpations, via fictional administrative rulings, unauthorized amendments, and his unauthorized seditious appeal in the above matter that is in contravention to the Supremacy Clause of the United States Constitution, and is seditious, treasonous, and defrauds the American people and the United States of America government. This Criminal Complain Truth Affidavit is about arresting Jonathan Lippman’s documented criminal unconstitutional usurpations. The dangers of usurpations are premised off of evils through amendments to the Constitution and fictional administration of law, as exemplified in the Levenson matter case titled: 1 No. 1: Leonard J. Levenson, et al. v. Jonathan Lippman,&c., et al. In this case the system of checks and balances has been obstructed via Jonathan Lippman’s unconstitutional usurpations, constructions, amendments and fictional administration. Jonathan Lippman’s actions, fictional rulings, and amendment in the above matter are documented unconstitutional usurpations. His appeal in the above matter is an act of sedition where he conspired to overthrow the Constitutional Government and delayed the execution of laws. His unconstitutional appeal and amendment perjured his oath of office and demonstrated his willfulness in conspiring to offend and defraud the United States of America for unauthorized power and control. Above all, Jonathan Lippman’s appeal in the above cited Levenson matter is documentation of FRAUD BY A JUDGE BY MAKING A FALSE REPRESENTATION, WRITING A FALSE DOCUMENT OR HAVING KNOWLEDGE THAT A DOCUMENT IS FALSE, MAKING A FALSE DECLARATION BEFORE A UNITED STATES COURT and he clearly abused and enjoined the Second Circuit Court of Appeals for his RACKETEERING BY CONDUCTING AN ONGOING ENTERPRISE OF BRIBERY, EXTORTION, OR THREATS OF SAME via his 2 billion dollar unregulated budget and his control position as an administrator of the judiciary which effectuated having his criminal usurpations disregarded, in violation of the SUPREMACY CLAUSE. Jonathan Lippman’s unconstitutional amendment and appeal in the above mentioned matter violate the below cited Supremacy Clause and are treasonous acts. THE SUPREMACY CLAUSE The Supremacy Clause, United States Constitutional Article VI declares that all laws made in pursuance of the Constitution and all treaties made under the authority of the United States shall be the supreme law of the land and shall enjoy legal superiority over any conflicting provision of a State constitution or law. The Operation of the Supremacy Clause: When Congress legislates pursuant to its delegated powers, conflicting state law and policy must yield. In the above cited Levenson matter, this did not happen. The disregard of documented lawless criminal usurpations is a violation of the Supremacy Clause. Moreover, the Jonathan Lippman criminal usurpation disregards are the direct reason New York State courts and government are operating against the people, and causing public outcries as exemplified in the Levenson matter. Obligation of State Courts under the Supremacy Clause The Constitution, laws, and treaties of the United States are as much a part of the law of every State as its own local laws and constitution. Their obligation ''is imperative upon the state judges, in their official and not merely in their private capacities. From the very nature of their judicial duties, they would be called upon to pronounce the law applicable to the case in judgment. They were not to decide merely according to the laws or Constitution of the State, but according to the laws and treaties of the United States--'the supreme law of the land'.'' State courts are bound then to give effect to federal law when it is applicable and to disregard state law when there is a conflict; federal law includes, of course, not only the Constitution and congressional enactments and treaties but as well the interpretations of their meanings by the United States Supreme Court. Jonathan Lippman via lawless usurpations has created a system of government where the law does not matter. He has lawlessly usurped power in all aspects of government, particularly in the courts, as exemplified in this criminal complaint premised off his documented usurpation crimes in the Levenson matter. He has lawlessly usurped power to dupe the people, obstruct justice, inflict legal fiction administration as a means of operation, while enforcing rulings/orders and amendments with no Constitutional authority. The evidence is in the criminal state of New York’s legal system status and the public cries for justice by the people and for the people, as exemplified in the above cited matter and the attachments affixed hereto. Congress created laws to help eradicate organized crime from social fabric by divesting association of fruits of ill-gotten gains. Primary intent of Congress was to combat infiltration of organized crime into legitimate businesses operating in interstate commerce. Jonathan Lippman’s fictional administration of law and unconstitutional administration of fictions as rulings, amendments and appeals, as exemplified in the attachments are predicated off of unconstitutional criminal raqueteering usurpations. An example of such is outlined in the Levenson law suit where the Appellate Division rendered its constitutionally compliant decision, documenting Jonathan Lippman’s criminal usurpations. Thereafter, Jonathan Lippman filed his documented seditious appeal overthrowing the Constitutional government, which was proximate cause of the Second Circuit Court of Appeals decision that conflicts with the Supremacy clause. Jonathan Lippman’s patterned raqueteering practices were the proximate cause of the Second Circuit Court of Appeals ruling in contravention to the Supremacy Clause. These acts in themselves exemplify Jonathan Lippman’s abnormal power crazed fictional administration to unconstitutionally usurp power divested in the courts. As noted above and in the attachments Jonathan Lippman has participated in a pattern of criminal usurpations and racketeering activity. Jonathan Lippman’s scheme of fraud had foreseeable results, in that when he filed his seditious appeal, he knew he had control over the courts via his trespass as Chief Administrative Justice and his unregulated budget, which consequently effectuated an unconstitutional validation of his criminal usurpation disguised as an amendment/appeal. By virtue of implementation of Lippman’s scheme of fraud, it is clear, that he expects the people of New York to stay complacent and allow the continuity or threat of continuing racketeering usurpation acts. This can not happen as each public official this criminal complaint is filed with has a public duty oath to do their homework and enforce the Supremacy clause and equal protection of the law on behalf of the public safety of the courts, and government as a whole. Jonathan Lippman’s appeal and amendment are not authorized. Jonathan Lippman’s criminal conduct, specifically his seditious appeal and amendment, rebelling against the constitutional authority and the misprision of treason of such, enable him to have interest and control of the court enterprise. If this continues, the Second Circuit Court of appeals judges will have rendered their freedom and sovereignty of themselves and the public trust of the people over to Jonathan Lippman under his diabolical scheme of fraud, deceit and duping via lawless Jonathan Lippman usurped amendments/rulings with no Constitutional authority. The remedy of such is Jonathan Lippman’s arrest, removal and impeachment for his documented criminal acts, with particularity his documented scheme to offend and defraud the United States via his ongoing and documented lawless usurpations and patterned and practiced seditious and insurrection rulings, amendments, appeals, and fictions against and defrauding the United States of America and New York Constitutional authority, as well as his acts against the people. See the attachments. Jonathan Lippman is administering an obstruction of justice NYS court system premised off of usurping lawless powers and defrauding the American people and is using the judiciary to subterfuge his crimes. His 2 billion dollar unregulated budget is being used to unconstitutionally obstruct, subvert, and destroy the New York State Constitutional authority and intelligence of the people. The decision that rendered Jonathan Lippman’s unconstitutional usurpations as valid has no Constitutional authority, is in direct violation of the Supremacy Clause, which further mandates the need for his arrest, removal and impeachment, because when he appealed the constitutionality of the Supremacy clause, he committed treason, as he should have known the Supremacy Clause regardless of what is stated in his unconstitutional rulings, the Supremacy clause states that when there is a controversy, the state laws yield. In summary, Jonathan Lippman’s fictional ruling, his amendment and appeal in the above Levenson matter, have no Constitutional authority, subvert the Constitution, obstruct the legal assistance program, delay payments for services rendered, advance oppression, undermine the integrity of the judiciary’s individual judge’s ability to calculate numbers, facilitates divide and conquer stratagems, and sneakily inflicts similar results to the eugenic agenda listed under his name. Jonathan Lippman’s use of the court via fictional rulings, amendments, and lawless usurpations, to advance similar eugenic results of the programs listed under his name has no place in New York Government. Another example of Jonathan Lippman’s Conspiracy to Offend and Defraud the United States is in the below excerpts from the Levenson matter. The below excerpts state that: This practice prompted protests from localities responsible for paying these enhanced awards. This is the clearest fraud there is, because the low attorney fees paid to help the people is what prompted protests which effectuated the multiple law suits against Jonathan Lippman being consolidated into the Levenson matter. Jonathan Lippman’s lawless usurped power caused the multiple law suits, public protests, and public cries. Never in the history of New York was the integrity of the judiciary so undermined that lawyers had to sue the courts over Jonathan Lippman’s newly erupted home made unauthorized rule. The creation of the above fiction has no validation or authority, and was created to subterfuge Jonathan Lippman’s lawless usurpation and intervention in matters the individual judges and the courts are equipped and constitutionally mandated to handle. Jonathan Lippman’s inflicted lawlessness via his unauthorized unconstitutional ruling had a domino effect. His seditious unauthorized ruling effectuated multiple law suits because the procedure for lawyers to get paid for constitutionally protected and required services were lawlessly obstructed, impeded, usurped, and interfered with. Jonathan Lippman’s unauthorized ruling prompted public protests such as multiple law suits filed against him for usurping unconstitutional powers he does not legitimately possess. The above excerpt from the Levenson matter is a fiction created to cover up Jonathan Lippman’s seditious ruling that caused the public protests. Above all, the above statement is an imaginative fiction that creates reason for Jonathan Lippman’s lawless usurpation and unwarranted interference. It is a form of creative writing that is supposed to further defraud from truth, that the public protests were the law suits filed due to the unconstitutional usurped Jonathan Lippman lawless, power and control, havoc causing, non validated, unauthorized, unconstitutional ruling. The rates were ultimately increased so who and what localities prompted protests? How come enhance awards were not protested or a problem until Jonathan Lippman’s trespass as a NYS judge inflicting unconstitutional, lawlessly usurped, fictional ruling? If the increased rates prompted protests why were they thereafter increased substantially? What validation exists to substantiate the above enhanced awards Jonathan Lippman created fiction? The validation that Jonathan Lippman’s power crazed, money control, unconstitutional, seditious, lawless usurpation prompted protests is the filing of multiple law suits against Jonathan Lippman for such. These are the only documented verified public protests on record. The above fiction excerpt, distorts truth, facilitates defrauding and duping the American people, has no validation, and exemplifies the fictional, lawlessly usurped, method of operation under the lawless administration and usurpations of Jonathan Lippman’s trespass as a NYS Chief Administrator. Another example of Jonathan Lippman defrauds and conspiracy to over throw the constitutional government is the below excerpt: There was, however no mechanism to review these enhanced awards, either judicially or administratively. The above excerpt is not true and or validated by Constitutional authority. It is a farce. The trial judges via Constitutional authority had and have been ruling on the awards. This above fiction serves to only subterfuge and creates reason for Jonathan Lippman’s lawless usurpation, unauthorized interference with individual courts, and abnormal power craze obsession to supervise the trial judge’s competency and discretion. This act in itself undermines the integrity of the judges and the judicial system as a whole. If a judge does not have the ability to decide on awards and or enhanced awards than the person should not hold the position of judge. There is no Constitutional authority to support the above newly erupted enhanced review Jonathan Lippman created usurpation quest problem. The above review problem is not validated, is another example of creative writing, disregards enhance review award past practices, and is nothing more than power hungry control over trial judges and undermines the integrity of the judiciary. Moreover it puts the judges and lawyers in the assistance program lawlessly at Jonathan Lippman’s mercy while having no authority to do so. Above all, it lawlessly undermines the individual judge’s and the Appellate Division’s power and enjoins the court system in Jonathan Lippman’s scheme of defraud, insurrection and sedition. Jonathan Lippman’s unauthorized rulings, amendment, appeal, and usurpations defraud the people, perjure his oath of office, are acts of sedition and insurrection against the Constitutional authority of the court system. Above all, Jonathan Lippman’s lawless usurpation administration impede due exercise of rights by preventing, obstructing, and impeding justice and constitutional rights as epitomized in the Levenson case. Specifically, Jonathan Lippman’s enhanced award created problem, obstructed and impeded justice via denying and or delaying Constitutionally protected rights embedded in paying assigned counsel for services rendered. Jonathan Lippman’s lawless usurpations have advanced by silent and gradual attacks upon constitutional safeguards. Never before in human history, has the head of a constitutional government who had sworn to protect, preserve, and defend its fundamental provisions publicly advised his subversion through administrative action and through judicial interpretation. Unless the people are stirred to recognition of the danger of such usurpations, they will never be checked and will continue. The arrest for the above charges is authorized by law, is not discretionary and or needing interpretation. The facts are clear. Jonathan Lippman has defrauded the United States as noted in his false declarations filed as an appeal. His appeal is an obvious attempt to over throw the government via lawlessly usurped unconstitutional powers. In Jonathan Lippman’s continued quest for lawless power and authority, that he does not possess, by his own actions, his appeal primarily, in the Levenson law suit against him, he failed to support the New York and United States of America Constitutions and perjured his oaths of office as a judge. He rebelled against Constitutional authority for his personal gain and used the Second Circuit Court of Appeals to cover his defraud and rebellion against Constitutional authority. In so-doing he invoked the self-executing sections 3 and 4 of the 14th Amendment, vacated his office, and forfeited all salaries, pensions and benefits. His unconstitutional usurpations, specifically, his unauthorized appeal, his unauthorized rule 127.b , his unauthorized rulings, in the attached law suit and exhibits present beyond a preponderance of the evidence and proof that his unconstitutional usurpations far exceeded the standard and are criminal acts of treason, insurrection and sedition. Specifically, in the attached Levenson law suit, Jonathan Lippman usurped legislative powers and functions; and failed to uphold the separation of powers as clearly set forth in the Constitution's model for our government. This is indisputable and requires no interpretation. It requires public official homework, review and arrest. Jonathan Lippman’s insurrection and rebellion against the Constitutional authority and the integrity of the court system can not be subterfuged by local level rules, ordinances, and or fictions that are in contravention to the Constitution. This would only mount to further misprision of treason and felonies by failing to report treason and commission of felonies when so noted as established in 18 USC Sections 2382 and Section 4. Pursuant to public officials sworn and bound oath, both this Nation and this state are Constitutional Republics. A Republic is rule by law, and not by men. The Supreme Law of this land is the American Constitution, by which all limited, delegated authority for government exists. What is not specifically authorized in the Constitution is prohibited by the Constitution. There are no exceptions. Further, the Constitutions are written in English, so no interpretation is necessary. They say what they mean, and mean what they say. Since Jonathan Lippman has difficulty understanding the plain, simple and direct language of the Constitutions, then he is not fit to occupy a public office which is charged with serving the Public Trust, or to wield so much assumed power over the People for whom he works and by whom he is paid. The American Citizen is sovereign in this Nation, not that government or court, pursuant to oaths taken, sworn to support the Constitution and serve the Citizen. No sovereignty is delegated by the Constitution to the machinery of the National and State governments, or divisions thereof. Sovereignty is inherent in the People and governmental powers are derived from the People, and the People, for good reason, did not delegate sovereign powers to the government. The only sovereignty associated with the States is that arising from the true nature of the State, which is the People, the body politic. When Jonathan Lippman was trespassing as a judge, it was his duty to uphold the Constitution, the powers thereof and the Rights guaranteed therein, yet he by his lawless usurpations, rulings, amendments, and actions, in each of the exhibits attached, acts in perjury of his oath and in defiance of the Constitution. Article III of the Constitution states that judges may serve in times of good behavior. Jonathan Lippman’s attached repetitiously unconstitutional usurpations and fictional rulings, denying the Constitution and Rights guaranteed therein to American Citizens, who claimed Rights before the court, is not serving in good behavior. Where Rights secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be no rule-making or legislation which would abrogate them.” Miranda v. Arizona , 384 U. S., 436. None of the procedures, rules, regulations and rulings of Jonathan Lippman which deny Constitutional Rights or which are not in compliance with the Constitution are valid, lawful, or have any force or effect whatsoever. Jonathan Lippman, by his orders in the Levenson matter, violated the above cited Supreme Court ruling and Citizens Rights since he created several legal fiction rulings in contravention to the Constitution. Jonathan Lippman is obligated to follow the law of the land, which he has failed to do, and has no Constitutional or legislative authority to create or change law. Jonathan Lippman’s fictional orders in the attached Levenson case are criminal in nature, unconstitutional and fail. The defraud in the Levenson case is exemplified in placing authority back in the courts where it Constitutionally belonged all the time and was subverted by Jonathan Lippman’s power crazed obsessions, unconstitutional fictional rulings, and psychotic repetitious public defraud against the United States and its Sovereign Citizens, including defrauding and undermining the integrity and intelligence of the trial court judges. Jonathan Lippman’s rebellion against the Constitution, Treason against the American People and violation of the public trust as well as his denial of his oath is published on the public record in the Levenson matter via his unconstitutional amendment and appeal. The below is another example of nonverified, non validated, and a usurpation created obstruction. By making no provision in the County Law for any review of excessive compensation awards, the Legislature simply created a gap in the administrative process that the Chief Administrator was entitled to fill. This is clear fraud as the trial judges had prescribed awards as constitutionally allowed, before Jonathan Lippman’s unauthorized usurpations. Moreover, Jonathan Lippman’s criminal usurpations are not supported by any Constitutional law. I challenge Jonathan Lippman and or any public official to verify and validate the Constitutional authority he used to inflict and enforce his rule 127.2 b fiction and his lawless appeal. The Jonathan Lippman legal fiction amendment can not be verified and or validated. It is a legal fiction with no Constititutional authority. It is an unconstitutional usurpation created to cause havoc, lawlessly take power away from judges, take power out of law and place it in a man, deny/delay and usurp the payment plan for Constitutionally required services for the poor at the mercy of Jonathan Lippman as opposed to at the entitlement of the law. Jonathan Lippman has an unregulated 2 billion dollar budget. Yet, these cases taking court time have been enforced to fight for minimum monies for constitutionally required services. These havoc causing Jonathan Lippman criminal unconstitutional usurpations can not be taken lightly as they have longstanding lawless power and control, advancing oppression, and divide and conquer effects that need to be addressed criminally, as authorized by law and publicly as needed. The amounts are minimal in comparison to Jonathan Lippman’s unregulated budget, yet he wants this control mechanism to eugenically, maliciously, deny people funds for services rendered to help the poor. This type of administration uses lawless usurpations to defraud people, obstruct government, impede the legal assistance programming, and interfere with federal and state laws, via deny constitutional assistance of counsel to those entitled. Jonathan Lippman’s lawlessly usurped amendment deliberately places the funding of constitutionally protected services in his lawless and usurped control. Jonathan Lippman’s lawless usurped amendment has no Constitutional authority validating its administration. In fact, Jonathan Lippman’s unauthorized usurped amendment is the direct cause of the multiple law suits that erupted in the Levenson matter. Jonathan Lippman’s usurped lawless fiction amendment is unauthorized, inconsistent with protections embedded in the 14th amendment, and has impeded and obstructed due exercise of rights via impede and delay payment for Constitutionally protected services. Jonathan Lippman has masterminded, orchestrated, and administered a eugenic, racist, usurpation amendment that obstructs justice and good faith community efforts to help people and impedes the paying for such services. Above all, Jonathan Lippman’s unauthorized amendment expands oppression by not paying professionals in a timely manner, further oppresses the oppressed by obstructing constitutionally protected services, and lawlessly places the financial control of the legal assistance program in his usurped power. These actions are beyond defrauding, they are criminal seditious acts to over throw Constitutional authority embedded in Equal Protection of the law. His amendment is worthless, invalid, unauthorized, and interferes with state and federal laws. The below excerpts epitomize Jonathan Lippman’s scheme of fraud and criminal usurpations in the Levenson matter. The first excerpt states that there is no provision for reviewing excessive compensation awards. The below excerpts identify the Constitutional provisions for review of excessive compensation awards. This is called a documented Conspiracy to Defraud the people of the United States and documented insurrection against the Constitution by engaging in rebellion against the Constitutional authority of the United States of America via fraud and defraud. •By making no provision in the County Law for any review of excessive compensation awards, the Legislature simply created a gap in the administrative process that the Chief Administrator was entitled to fill. The above fiction is not validated, is unauthorized and is in conflict with truth. It is simply not true because the Constitution via legislative power authorizes the trial judges to review awards, as well as past practices. •Prior to the amendment, Rule 127.2 (b) provided that, upon proper application to review an award of enhanced attorney's fees, the trial judge could reconsider the award in consultation with the appropriate administrative judge. The final determination of the fees, however, remained with the trial judge. •In pertinent part, the proposed legislation read, "Any order of a trial court determining a claim for compensation or reimbursement hereunder shall be subject to review in the court having appellate jurisdiction of the action in which the claim was made upon application of the claimant or the political subdivision upon which payment of the claim is a charge. The appellate court shall provide for the expedited determination of such application and may confirm, increase, or decrease the compensation or reimbursement awarded." Jonathan Lippman’s usurped amendment has no constitutional authority, is an example of perjury against his oath, is seditious, insurrects rebellion against the Constitutional authority of the United States of America Government, is in contravention to the Supremacy Clause, destroys walls of protection, has interfered with state and federal laws, impedes due exercise of rights by attempting to impede with same, and effectuated a conspiracy against rights as exemplified in the two attachments titled: In Pay Disputes, Some Lawyers For the Poor Refuse Cases and For the Poor, A Lawyer with 1600 Clients. Jonathan Lippman’s amendment is unconstitutional since it impermissibly usurps that power expressly reserved by the New York State Constitution to the New York State Legislature and impinges on the exclusive jurisdiction of the Court as provided by the New York State Legislature. Jonathan Lippman’s criminal unauthorized, unconstitutional, usurped fictional administration has longstanding eugenic ramifications consistent with other inflicted oppression programs listed under his name and with his two billion dollar unregulated budget. County L Section 722-b of the County Law governs the compensation rates for attorneys who participate in the Assigned Counsel Plan. During the period relevant to this case, County Law 722-b provided that attorneys participating in the Assigned Counsel Plan be compensated at a rate not to exceed $25 per hour for work performed outside of court and $40 per hour for work performed in court, plus reasonable expenses. The provision further imposed a cap of $800 for misdemeanor cases and $1,200 for felony cases and all appellate matters.[1] However, upon application to the court, compensation in excess of these statutory limits could be paid upon a showing of "extraordinary circumstances." JONATHAN LIPPMAN’S DEFRAUD SCHEME FOR LAWLESS POWER OVER THE JUDGES AND OVER THE FINANCING OF THE 14TH AMENDMENT EQUAL PROTECTION ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL PROGRAM, IS CRIMINALLY SEDITIOUS. IT IS FRAUD ON THE COURTS, THE JUDGES AND THE PEOPLE OF NEW YORK STATE. THE ABOVE EXCERPT IS THE CLEAREST CONSTITUTIONAL PROVISION FOR REVIEW OF EXCESSIVE COMPENSATION AWARDS. JONATHAN LIPPMAN INSURRECTED AND REBELLED AGAINST THE CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITY OF NEW YORK STATE GOVERNMENT TO LAWLESSLY USURP POWER HE DOES NOT LEGITIMATELY POSSESS AND USED THAT LAWLESS POWER TO INFILTRATE THE NY COURTS WITH HIS DOCUMENTED PERSONAL EUGENIC PLAN OF DESTRUCTION SIMILAR TO THE ONE LISTED UNDER HIS NAME UNDER DEADLY PATHOGENS. THIS IS BEYOND A DISTURBANCE IT IS A HITLER PLAN OF DESTRUCTION VIA DOCUMENTED GENOCIDAL CONSPIRACY, DEFRAUD, INSURRECTION, REBELLION AGAINST THE CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITY OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA WITH EUGENIC IMPACTS CONSISTENT WITH OTHER JONATHAN LIPPMAN TITLED PHENOMENA. “Upon application to the court, compensation in excess of these statutory limits could be paid upon a showing of "extraordinary circumstances." WHAT PART OF THIS IS NOT IN ENGLISH? HE HAS MADE MY LIFE MISERABLE AND I WAS RIGHT ALL THE TIME. HE IS A DISGUISED KILLER NUTCASE. HE DEFIED, DEFRAUDED, BETRAYED THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, NEW YORK STATE AND LAWLESSLY USURPED POWER HE DOES NOT LEGITIMATELY POSSESS TO INFLICT HIS EUGENIC PHENOMENON. JONATHAN LIPPMAN’S LAWLESS USURPATION ACTIONS IN AFRICA ARE CONSISTENT WITH HIS LAWLESS USURPATIONS IN THE LEVENSON MATTER. THE PHENOMENON LISTED UNDER JONATHAN LIPPMAN’S NAME DESTROYED A NATURALLY RICH IN RESOURCES COUNTRY OVER THIS PYCHOTIC’S GREED, ABNORMAL POWER AND CONTROL OBSESSIONS, AND JONATHAN LIPPMAN SHOULD BE HUNG, BUT OH FOR GOD’S GRACE AND MERCY. I WAIT TO VISIT JONATHAN LIPPMAN IN JAIL WITH MY BIBLE. HE SOLD HIS SOUL AND WAS DECEIVED! THE EARTH BELONGS TO ALMIGHTY GOD THE CREATOR OF ALL! JONATHAN LIPPMAN HAS TRIED TO HAVE ME KILLED UNDER MULTIPLE DISGUISES FOR THE LAST 13 YEARS, AND ALL MY HELP CAME AND COMES FROM GOD! NO EQUAL PROTECTION OF MAN MADE LAWS WAS PROVIDED. WHY? THE BELOW EXCERPT SHOWS HOW JONATHAN LIPPMAN UPROOTED, OBSTRUCTED, IMPEDED, AND INTERFERED WITH STATE AND FEDERAL LAWS AND TRIED TO TURN GOOD JUDGES INTO BAD ONES. JONATHAN LIPPMAN NOT ONLY UNDERMINED THE INTEGRITY OF THE COURT SYSTEM, HE OBSTRUCTED THE INTEGRITY OF THE COURT SYSTEM AND OF THE UNITED STATES. HE DELIBERATELY INFLICTED EUGENICAL GLOBAL WARFARE. These assigned counsel rates, in effect since 1986, have worked a hardship upon the assigned counsel system as the number of attorneys willing to participate in the program severely decreased because the fees were inadequate. At the same time, the number of individuals in need of assigned representation increased, causing many trial courts to struggle to find attorneys willing to represent indigent defendants in criminal proceedings. There arose a growing concern that the lack of attorneys available to represent indigent criminal defendants threatened to deny such individuals their federal and state constitutional rights. To alleviate the problem, a number of trial judges authorized enhanced compensation awards for assigned counsel. These judges concluded that the loss of attorneys from the assigned counsel panels due to the existing rate structure constituted an extraordinary circumstance justifying an enhanced hourly rate to ensure the availability of qualified attorneys to provide constitutionally required representation. All judges and other public officers are required to swear an oath, and be bound thereby, to support the Constitution of the United States of America. Article III requires judges to serve in times of “good behavior” and making rulings consistent with the Constitution is serving in good behavior. The opposite is not. The attached law suit against Jonathan Lippman clearly establishes the ramifications of his fictional, power crazed, amendment inconsistent with the Constitution, which effectuated public protests via multiple law suits. This is not good behavior. Lawful rulings must be based in constitutionally compliant law or case. See the Supremacy Clause. Jonathan Lippman’s attached unconstitutional usurpations assumes that he, himself, is higher law and has higher authority than the Supreme Law of this land, the Constitution of the United States of America. This is staggering typical arrogance and the underlying criminality has obstructed varied parts of government and requires arrest. I limit my description of his unlawful, criminal and unconstitutional acts because they are too ruthless, deadly and extensive. However, see the attachments and the above mentioned Documentaries I have written based on Jonathan Lippman research. Too many Americans have given their last full measure of devotion for this Nation in the many wars to save other people in other lands and protect their rights, and are still doing so this very day. For true, Americans to allow Jonathan Lippman and or any other public officer to violate Rights and enforce unconstitutional usurpations, against American Citizens, while American servicemen and women die in foreign lands to protect the rights of others totally, violates any and all concept of freedom for which America is supposed to stand for. Virtually everything Jonathan Lippman presented in the attached Levenson law suit was done in the regular and usual business operations of the government of New York, inflicted with Jonathan Lippman’s usual customs and practices of unconstitutional, unlawful, fraudulent, actions and operations, based in fraud, deception, lies, non-existent "laws", rules, regulations, codes, etc., which have no Constitutional or lawful bearing or application, whatsoever. Pursuant to Jonathan Lippman’s sworn and bound oaths, his unconstitutional usurpations, as noted in the Levenson lawsuit and the attachments, Jonathan Lippman has betrayed the Public Trust, which he is duty bound to uphold, and his unlawful actions also defy the laws of this state, yet, he has usurped unconstitutional power to demand other judges, ( see the Cheryl Coleman case and Laura Blackburne, Matter of Blackburne, 7 NY3d 213, 2006 cases attached) and citizens of this state, for whom he works and by whom he is paid, strictly abide by unlawful, unconstitutional "laws", rules, regulations, etc., which he fraudulently imposed upon them, under threat and coercion, and to which they are not liable. Fraud and deceit are not law, no matter what is stated, by and through its claims. The Constitution provides only limited delegated powers, which cannot lawfully and constitutionally exceed, nor Jonathan Lippman assume powers not specifically delegated. In the attached Levenson law suit against Jonathan Lippman, one clearly sees Jonathan Lippman’s obstruction of justice, malfeasance, and detraction from the dignity of the judiciary via his unconstitutional amendment that prompted protests from localities and attorneys which filed multiple law suits against him because his newly created amendment has no Constitutional authority, lawlessly usurps power and has no good faith meaning. The most compelling evidence against Jonathan Lippman’s crimes in the attached lawsuit is his lawless, fictional and unconstitutional rulings and actions in contrary to public policy. Jonathan Lippman usurped Constitutional power to create, implement and administer a system of injustice that obstructed statutorily entitled assistance of counsel for individuals charged with crimes. This exemplifies in the clearest form Jonathan Lippman’s conspiracy to offend and defraud the United States, by having an oath to uphold the Constitution, but acting to destroy it and fellow citizen’s rights protected in it. The above cited Jonathan Lippman acts epitomize perjury against his oath of office by obstructing and subverting Constitutional authority and requirements. Insurrection against the Constitution is demonstrated by his appeal which incites assists and engages in rebellion against the Constitutional authority of the United States of America. Jonathan Lippman’s sedition/seditious conspiracy by conspiring to overthrow the constitutional government or delay the execution of a law of the United States of America is exemplified in his unconstitutional amendment and unconstitutional appeal which impede due exercise of rights by attempting to prevent, obstruct, and interfere with Constitutionally protected rights embedded in assistance of counsel for those charged with crimes. He literally obstructed justice to administer a fictional ruling with discriminatory, eugenic, and malicious ramifications and impacts. In the attached law suit against Jonathan Lippman, he masterminded and administered fictional, unconstitutional and malicious rulings that subverted Constitutionally required services. The multiple lawsuits against Jonathan Lippman were caused by his unconstitutional new unauthorized amendment. This clearly undermines the integrity of the judiciary. He used his position as a judge to usurp power to retard, subvert and obstruct Constitutionally required assistance. Jonathan Lippman’s documented criminality can not be taken lightly as his actions undermine the integrity of the judiciary, undermine public trust, and are contrary to public policy. Above all, his fictional rulings are unconstitutional, obstruct justice and lack specific constitutional or statutory provision granting authority for his actions. Another example of Jonathan Lippman’s criminal trespass as a judge, specializing in usurpation matters is his using his judicial role to intimidate local government by enjoining in matters specializing in usurping. This matter is the Greens at Half Hollow, LLC v Town of Huntington case. Although he is a Plaintiff in the matter, he used his position as Chief Justice to intimidate a usurpation matter. The usurpation specialist was used to regulate usurpation. In this matter he is a usurpation specialist, with usurpation regulatory intimidation power. This requires scrutiny and review. Moreover I challenge Jonathan Lippman to identify by name and address all persons, corporations, associations, or any other parties having an interest in the legal proceedings regarding the alleged usurpation. I challenge that he can not provide verification that he was authorized to act as the usurpation regulator and plaintiff in the above cited matter. These lawless usurpations and legal abuse intimidations, divest power from people, and are premised off of Jonathan Lippman personal gain and power craze criminal acts and agenda for New York State. Soon all of New York will lawlessly be controlled by Jonathan Lippman’s lawless intimidations, schemes of fraud and defraud and impede in local level government while trespassing as a judge. So far, Jonathan Lippman’s above acts violate: •Section 100.01 A judge shall uphold the integrity and independence of the judiciary •Section 100.02 A judge shall avoid impropriety and the appearance of impropriety in all of the judge's activities •Section 100.03 A judge shall perform the duties of judicial office impartially and diligently. •Section 100.04 A judge shall so conduct the judge's extra-judicial activities as to minimize the risk of conflict with judicial obligations •Section 100.05 A judge or candidate for elective judicial office shall refrain from inappropriate political activity. Another Jonathan Lippman unauthorized lawless usurpation that I have reviewed is the attached Jonathan Lippman September 22, 2005 letter to Alan Hevesi, New York State Comptroller. Jonathan Lippman’s letter lawlessly usurps power, abuses judicial power, and cites no lawful Constitutional authority to validate his obstructing justice, usurped, power hungry, uncalled for recommendations. Mr. Havesi’s letter to Jonathan Lippman dated June 7, 2005 cites Constitutional authority and yet the Constitutional authority was over looked and lawless usurped power was still attempted by Jonathan Lippman on September 22, 2005. These abnormal power craze, intimidation, judicial abusive practices, Constitutionally unauthorized Jonathan Lippman acts require public sanctioning, as he is acting without any Constitutional authority and abusing local laws and his position to lawlessly usurp power. Jonathan Lippman’s lawless usurpations obstruct governmental administration, overthrow Constitutional walls of protection, are seditious acts attempting to over throw the constitutional government and impede due exercise of rights by attempting to interfere with same. Another example of Jonathan Lippman fictional administration that undermines the integrity of the judiciary and inflicts havoc is the attached letter to Jonathan Lippman dated March 27, 2006 by Andrea Masley. This letter documents Jonathan Lippman’s fictional administration of “catch 22” rulings which obstruct governmental administration, overthrow the Constitutional government, impede due exercise of rights, dismantle governmental walls of protection, and removes power of the law and places it in a man. The Constitutional authority of this ruling is questionable as it has effectuated usurped power seeking resolution from Jonathan Lippman as opposed to resolution based on law or laws. Another Jonathan Lippman fictional and defrauding administrative act requiring public scrutiny as to the authority and rationale, is the attached New York Times March 2, 2007 Metro Briefing Article, New York: Brooklyn: Judge Reorganizes Investigative Offices. This defraud appears as if a Brooklyn judge reorganized the investigative offices, when in reality Jonathan Lippman did and he did so under unknown authority. After widespread reports of judicial wrongdoing, Jonathan Lippman minimized via consolidation, the judicial investigative unit. This is sick, has no Constitutional validation and exemplifies Jonathan Lippman’s quest to silence his documented treason, perjury against his oath, acts of sedition, and Conspiracy to Defraud and offend the United States. There are two Jonathan Lippman phenomena I would like to call attention to. One is his attached first page of his report on the New York State Unified Court System Filing By Electronic Means and Filing By Facsimile Transmission Pilot Programs dated April 1, 2002. The coversheet is dated. The second page where he describes court administration as a PHENOMENON is not dated. Jonathan Lippman defines this court administration project as a phenomenon, just like his name was used to define the attached multiple genocidal deadly pathogen programs, as a PHENOMENON. I welcome an explanation for these vocabulary phenomena. Jonathan Lippman’s administration of the courts, while his name is listed under deadly pathogen programs that have left over 13 million people dead under a phenomenon, requires investigation under the above cited charges, with emphasis on his Conspiracy to Defraud the United States 18, USC Section 371. There are over 13 million people dead under Jonathan Lippman’s name and definition of a phenomena while he has an unregulated 2 billion dollar budget and a has a public record documented history of lawlessly usurping power that inflicts oppression. How did this happen? Equal protection and enforcement of the law is beyond required as the ramifications of the above are beyond disturbances and are beyond probable causes for Genocide charges. It is my prayer that these similarities will be investigated and the inflicted pathogen administration will be dismantled. Above all, I seek protection from his public record documented lawless usurpation patterns and practices as he has used all of New York State government to retaliate against a witness via ongoing inflicted usurped lawlessness documented in affidavits sent to Andrew Cuomo, New York Attorney General’s office, Chief Judge Judith Kayes office, and NYC FBI’s office, and Commissioner Rose Hearn’s office of NYC Department of Investigations, as well as other offices. Jonathan Lippman’s lawless pathogenic usurpations are not just eugenic. The lawless usurpation practices are used to kill white people as well, although the emphasis is on black people. This is a psychotic power and control mechanism, defined as divide and conquer, while I usurp lawless control. It is psychotic, but it works. Moreover, the disregard of documented criminal and deadly lawless usurpations is the ramifications of communities being controlled by Jonathan Lippman’s unregulated budget as opposed to equal protections embedded in safety, freedom, and exercising God given rights to correct man made wrongs. I can not fault the system. I fault the people in the system that disregarded documented crimes and allowed Jonathan Lippman’s criminal and deadly usurpations to continue. I sympathize for the warriors, black and white, that have been killed under this Jonathan Lippman documented lawless usurpation disregard phenomena. Jonathan Lippman’s documented criminal usurpations will end because God is God and no criminal in history from Biblical days to today has ever reigned for ever. I simply pray for the innocent people who will continue to fall prey to Jonathan Lippman’s multifaceted criminal lawless usurpations that have effectuated ruthless public disturbances, beyond public protests and exemplified in over 13 million people dead under pathogen programs in his name and under his definition of phenomena. I welcome Jonathan Lippman’s explanation of this. Additionally, Jonathan Lippman’s public record lawless usurpations, the attachments, the deadly pathogen programs in his name, violate the basic rules of judicial conduct. A JUDGE SHALL CONDUCT ALL OF THE JUDGE'S JUDICIAL ACTIVITIES SO THAT THEY DO NOT: 1.CAST DOUBT ON THE JUDGE'S CAPACITY TO ACT IMPARTIALLY AS A JUDGE; 2.DEMEAN THE JUDICIAL OFFICE; 3.INTERFERE WITH THE PROPER PERFORMANCE OF JUDICIAL DUTIES; OR 4.VIOLATE THE JUDGE'S OATH AND OBLIGATION TO UPHOLD THE LAWS AND CONSTITUTIONS OF THE UNITED STATES AND THE STATE OF THE NEW YORK. JONATHAN LIPPMAN HAS: 1.FAILED TO UPHOLD THE INTEGRITY AND INDEPENDENCE OF THE JUDICIARY BY FAILING TO OBSERVE HIGH STANDARDS OF CONDUCT, IN VIOLATION OF SECTION 100.1 OF THE RULES OF JUDICIAL CONDUCT (22 NYCRR). 2.FAILED TO AVOID IMPROPRIETY AND THE APPEARANCE OF IMPORPRIETY AND HAS FAILED TO ACT IN A MANNER THAT PROMOTES PUBLIC CONFIDENCE IN THE INTEGRITY AND IMPARTIALITY OF THE JUDICIARY IN VIOLATION OF SECTION 100.2 ( A) 3.FAILED TO PERFORM THE DUTIES OF JUDICIAL OFFICE IMPARTIALLY AND DILIGENTLY IN THAT HE HAS FAILED TO BE FAITHFUL TO THE SUPREME LAW OF THE LAND, THE CONSTITUTION AND HE HAS FAILED TO MAINTAIN PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE IN IT, IN VIOLATION OF SECTION 100.3 (B) (1). 4.LENT THE PRESTIGE OF JUDICIAL OFFICE TO ADVANCE THE PRIVATE INTEREST OF THE JUDGES, OR OTHERS, IN VIOLATION OF RULES OF JUDICIAL CONDUCT (22 NYCRR) SECTION 100.2 (C). 5.INFLICTED GRAVE MISUSE OF ONE'S OFFICIAL POSITION AS A METHOD OF OPERATION. 6.EXERCISED POWER HE DOES NOT LEGITIMATELY POSSESS. 7.INFLICTED A WILLFUL DISREGARD OF A JUDGE' S PROPER ROLE AND AUTHORITY 8. ATTEMPTED TO AND USURPED THE PEROGATIVES OF THE LEGISLATURE. 9. REBELLED AGAINST HIS SWORN OATH THAT HE WOULD DEFEND AND SUPPORT THE CONSTITUTION THE SUPREME LAW OF THIS LAND WHICH SECURES EQUAL PROTECTION OF THE LAWS. Jonathan Lippman’s egregious unconstitutional criminal local and worldwide usurpations in the attached exhibits require the writing of this criminal complaint. I have studied, researched, and have been victimized by criminal unconstitutional Jonathan Lippman usurpation pattern and practices, for over 13 years. It is the grace of God as to why I and my family are still alive, as Jonathan Lippman’s documented unconstitutional, power crazed, lethal usurpations are deadly, a public safety threat to all living beings, are well documented and require his documented unconstitutional usurpation practices to be arrested immediately. Pursuant to NYCCRR 691.9 Jonathan Lippman should submit an admission that he can not successfully defend himself on the merits against the above specified charges. To this end, in addition to submitting this criminal complaint to authorities for his arrest as authorized, and on behalf of ending criminal seditious usurpations, I am sending a copy of this criminal complaint to Jonathan Lippman, pursuant to the Federal Constitution, specifically, the Bill of Rights, in particular, the First, Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, Seventh, Ninth and Tenth Amendments, and pursuant to his oath, as such I seek his written response to me, specific to the subject matter and I demand certified copies of all oaths filed, if any, for the record. His failure to respond to me, within 30 days , as stipulated, and rebut, with particularity, everything in this AFFIDAVIT OF TRUH CRIMINAL COMPLAINT with which he disagrees, is his lawful, legal and binding agreement with and admission to the fact that everything in this complaint is true, correct, legal, lawful and fully binding upon him in any court in America, without his protest or objection his silence is his acquiescence. See: Connally v. General Construction Co., 269 U.S. 385,391. Notification of legal responsibility is “the first essential of due process of law”. See also: U.S. V. Tweel, 550 F.2d.297. “Silence can only be equated with fraud where there is a legal or moral duty to speak or when an inquiry left unanswered would be intentionally misleading.” I am more than qualified to submit this criminal complaint Truth Affidavit as it is my testimony that lawless Jonathan Lippman usurpations kill under multiple disguises cited in each and every Documentary I have written and submitted to authorities. Above all, Jonathan Lippman’s lawless usurpation patterns have exemplified themselves in each and every aspect of my life and were the direct reasons mandating lawsuits I have filed where Constitutional and God given protections and rights were disregarded, similar to the lawless disregard in the Levenson case. Legal abuse, insurance fraud, racketeering, money laundering, defraud administration, statutory tenure obstructions, and pure obstruction of justice was prioritized in the below matters, patterning Jonathan Lippman's judicial trespass patterns and practices. He has masterminded and manifested a court system that further victimizes the victims, Snyder vs. Christine Stewart , University of Rochester Medical Center Affiliate, filed 1994 in The Supreme Court of The State Of New York County Of New York Index Number 131972/94 See Snyder v. Hempstead Public Schools et al , Second Circuit Court of Appeals; Docket No. 02-9386, In the Eastern District Court, Snyder v. Hempstead Public Schools Docket No. 02-3589, In the Southern District Court, Snyder v. Yonkers Public Schools, Docket No: 03 CIV. 0263. The Supreme Court of the Sate of New York Appellate Term: Ninth and Tenth Judicial Districts, HDW Apartments Index No: SP242/00 and 20001220NC. In each case I was boldly, lawlessly, ruthlessly and maliciously denied equal protection of the law. Jonathan Lippman is a power crazed, documented, criminal, lawless, unauthorized, unconstitutional lawless usurper of power he does not legitimately possess. His public record lawless usurpations are real, criminal, and are clear seditious acts to over throw the constitutional government and delay the execution of laws of the United States of America. His unconstitutional amendments, appeal, and legal fiction administration, are acts of insurrection against the Constitution by inciting and engaging rebellion against the Constitutional authority of the United States of America. The first question that needs to be publicly verified meaning written under oath and in his response letter to me is whether Jonathan Lippman has taken an oath to the federal and state Constitutions? If so, where are they filed? Second, does he possess a valid surety bond, on file for public scrutiny, pursuant to state statutes and in the performance of his official duties? If so, where? Third, does he believe that he is required to conduct his duties pursuant to and in compliance with that oath? To this end, I am forwarding this AFFIDAVIT to Jonathan Lippman in his official capacity. I am publicly SERVING via certified mail return receipt a copy of this verified criminal complaint against him in good faith seeking an end to the crimes cited above, and the multiple disguised killings that occur because of the disregard of the crimes cited at the top of this complaint. It is time Jonathan Lippman’s fictional, unconstitutional administration and deadly usurpations are arrested as required and allowed by the above authorities cited and the attached preponderance of evidence. Please note that in America, subversive elements within 'the Government' have created their own problems by repeatedly ignoring, subverting, perverting, and violating the fundamental Laws of this Nation and the interests of 'We, the People'. So 'We, the People' can correct the trouble by returning 'The United States Government' to the limits lawfully established for it by The Constitution-as-written for these united States of America and by the Constitutions-as-written of the respective States. All political power is vested in and derived from the people; all government of right originated with the people, is founded upon their will and is instituted solely for their good. To establish due process, I respectfully request that Jonathan Lippman explains under oath in writing why his name is listed as the Deadly Pathogen leadership in the attached deadly pathogen programs that have left over 13 million dead under disguise. In addition, to establish due process, an explanation as to why his name is listed as an active member of the University of Rochester Medical Center infectious disease and emergency room departments? As questioned in the Documentaries I have written about Jonathan Lippman’s Multifaceted Can You Prove It While I Kill Operations, where are the viruses coming from that are funneled into the deadly pathogen programs listed under his name? Does he realize that there are over 13 million dead people under programs listed under his name? Does he have any idea how this happened? Please review the two documents listing court administration as a phenomenon and listing pathogen administration as a phenomenon. How did this happen? Jonathan Lippman’s verifiable response is sought as lawless usurped powers have been used to deny fair investigations and delay his arrest. Consequently, I am submitting this complaint to authorities for an independent non usurped investigation into the crimes mentioned above that obstruct justice, terrorize nations, and people, and kill under multiple disguises. I am submitting a copy to Jonathan Lippman to establish due process as stated above. I am tired of Jonathan Lippman’s public record documented criminal usurpations that are being silenced lawlessly without any Constitutional authority, against public policy allowing him continual above the law treatment that serves no other purpose but to facilitate his multiple disguised killing operations, of which I am under right now via lawless usurped governmental obstructions documented in the above offices cited. I will not end up dead under any of Jonathan Lippman documented disguised killing operations via lawless usurped unauthorized powers that he does not legitimately possess. At present, Jonathan Lippman’s lawless usurpation patterns have been inflicted to deny me every monetary entitlement due me. God is a provider and I did not need to be under the control of Jonathan Lippman’s monetary exploitation and usurpation power, to hinder this needed complaint on behalf of the human race and life without Jonathan Lippman deadly usurpations. Though the genocide project listed under his name targets and executes people of color in the millions via the pathogens listed under his name, he is also administering other deadly pathogens for white people, mainly for judges, lawyers, and people in positions of power. See the attached documentation of lawless usurpation in the American Federation of Teachers after being warned. If members of the judiciary think lawless usurpations, will not impact them, they had really better think twice, because crime is contagious. No one is exempt as long as Jonathan Lippman’s documented usurpation crimes are disregarded. Challenge Jonathan Lippman and thereafter make an appointment with a doctor. You will not come out the doctors office the way you went in and to disguise the phenomenon, he may order a time release pathogen to finish you off. The two billion dollar unregulated budget is inhumane and produces inhumane results. Look at the epidemics and disturbances listed under his name. Attached you will find Jonathan Lippman’s name in the search engine of the University of Rochester Medical Center and emergency room. This is where trauma patients are placed. Thereafter, they are placed via lawless, expert, well financed, usurped design, they are placed in the control tower, the infectious disease department, where the attached pathogens listed under Jonathan Lippman’s name are created. All it takes to make the attached Jonathan Lippman named deadly pathogen phenomenon work is one corrupted virologist/medical RESEARCHER. In fact, with an unregulated 2 billion dollar budget, multiple corrupted virologists will line up! In fact, multiple corrupted virologist are needed to facilitate the disguise, nondisclosure and to perfect an ongoing conspiracy against rights. With this plan, the only evidence is the bodies and it looks like a bonafide PHENOMENON, Jonathan Lippman thought! To facilitate a description of one of Jonathan Lippman’s named and titled Deadly Pathogen phenomenon, I will present an example of how it works based on my research of this Jonathan Lippman lawless usurpation based Can You Prove It, While I Kill Phenomena. This example will show how Jonathan Lippman’s Disguised Killing phenomena works non eugenically. In other words I will describe Jonathan Lippman’s disguised killing for the general public. When Jonathan Lippman’s Disguised Killing Phenomena Operations are killing non eugenically, the motive is usually for a position of power and control, at times, revenge, and for whistle blowing. The seed/ROOT of ALL of his multifaceted disguised killing phenomena operations is based in LAWLESS USURPATIONS which his unregulated budget makes easy. I have documented the revenge and whistle blowing Jonathan Lippman disguised killing patterns in the Documentaries I have written. For example, let’s say Jonathan Lippman had his eye on John Walker, the former Second Circuit Court of Appeals Chief Justice position. He wants to control that office, but Mr. Walker is experienced so he can only go but so far. This is a problem to Jonathan Lippman because he wants to control that office. Consequently, a phenomenon must be implemented to get rid of Mr. Walker. Jonathan Lippman can not just kill him. That would be too obvious. Consequently, a phenomenon must be implemented that will rid Chief Justice Walker because Jonathan Lippman wants control of that office in its entirety. Please note this office is where the criminal seditious usurpations were disregarded. Consequently, Mr. Walker goes home one night and miraculously a phenomenon occurred. This phenomenon compelled Mr. Walker to resign. Mr. Walker was in a miraculous car accident that no one can explain. The person Mr. Walker hit in the car accident, a police officer, miraculously died under a hospitalized emergency room phenomena. The notes to the accident say Mr. Walker was driving slowly in the rain. Yet, this police officer miraculously died appearing from the car accident, yet Mr. Walker was driving slowly. The phenomena include a miraculous accident and now a miraculous death, another human life lost under a phenomena. Further phenomena are the police officer died from unknown causes. Follow the dots, for those who know my Documentaries. All of these phenomena miraculously opened the Second Circuit Court of Appeals Chief Justice office and guess who had his eye on that office all along. Since, the man that Chief Justice Walker hit was white, a cop, and died, somebody had to pay. Immediately after the above inflicted Chief Justice Walker phenomenon killing, a miraculously erupted NYC, police shooting spree occurred in which a black man was killed by over fifty police shootings under a phenomenon. Nobody knows why this man was shot, much more so many times. However, there is a causal relationship between the timing of this phenomenon and the John Walker phenomenon. We have two dead bodies under a phenomenon, and the Second Circuit Court of Appeals office rid of Mr. Walker and the people in New York State are pitted against each other. While the people of New York are pitted, and two innocent men are dead, Jonathan Lippman’s mission is accomplished. The Chief Justice position is vacant. While the people of New York are pitted against each other, he is busy fictionizing the vacant Chief Justice position. The reality is you have an innocent dead police officer and an innocent dead black man all orchestrated to create a vacancy, subterfuge the hospital police killing and pit the people of New York. Guess what? With this inflicted havoc and dead bodies, no one is monitoring this newly created Chief Justice vacancy but Jonathan Lippman. The timing of such and killing a black man to soften the hospital killing of the Jonathan Lippman target cop, exemplifies how this operation works. There are two innocent dead men killed under phenomena and Chief Judge Walker’s position became vacant under a phenomenon. This is not court administration. This is dark forces black magic phenomena administration. It is spiritual wickedness in high places. Read the Bible, specifically, Ephesians 6 verse 12. FOR WE WRESTLE NOT AGAINST FLESH AND BLOOD, BUT AGAINST PRINCIPALITIES, AGAINST POWERS, AGAINST THE RULERS OF THE DARKNESS OF THIS WORLD, AGAINST SPIRITUAL WICKEDNESS IN HIGH PLACES. END OF JONATHAN LIPPMAN PHENOMENA. HE IS A FALLEN ANGEL AND MUST BE NOTED AS SUCH. Based on my research of Jonathan Lippman’s killing operations, this is how the operation works and for every white person they kill, black people must pay in multitudes. The pattern is too extensive to detail now. However, this is a clear example of what and how Jonathan Lippman lawless power and control usurpation Disguised Killing phenomenon entails. Remember this was an example, but the truth of the matter is, the above example opened the Second Circuit Court of Appeals Office and Jonathan Lippman is having a fiesta! In fact since this opening, the inflicted lawless usurpations have escalated to a level unimaginable, requiring this complaint. The Jonathan Lippman Can You Prove It While I kill Disguised Killing Operations all end with Dead people and Can You Prove it phenomena. Pursuant to my research, the phenomena are easily inflicted via black magic and using dark forces to manage enterprises and people. The police officer was killed for no other reason but to, push and make sure Mr. Walker retires, leaves office. See attachments. Again, the Jonathan Lippman plan worked effectively. We have a cop killed under hospital phenomena and a black man killed by a cop under phenomena. Miraculously, phenomena created Chief Justice Walker’s vacancy and the people of NYC are so busy being pitted against each other that nobody but Jonathan Lippman is monitoring Chief Justice Walker’s vacancy. Phenomenon administration is Jonathan Lippman’s only expertise, but with a two billion dollar unregulated budget, the phenomena gets perfected. Jonathan Lippman gets to control the Second Circuit Court of Appeals by his very own design. Tell the truth and shame the devil! Even though Mr. Walker former Chief judge of the Second Circuit Court of Appeals, did me wdisregarded several Jonathan Lippman complaints I filed, I still feel sorry for him. He is sitting home blinking his eyes wondering what happened. Guess what, he was set up and forced out of his position via phenomenon embedded in lawless usurpations that kill under multiple disguises. Mr. Walker needs to thank God he is related to the president of the United States or he would have been killed under a phenomena just like so many other innocent people, because this is what Jonathan Lippman does best. It is the disguise, inflicted phenomena, and reactions to such that intrigues Jonathan Lippman. Jonathan Lippman can not understand why his phenomenon does nothing for or to me. It does nothing to or for me because God rescued me multiple times from Jonathan Lippman’s patterned and practiced deadly phenomena seeded from lawless usurpations. In fact, Jonathan Lippman’s lawless phenomena and lawless administration of phenomena, particularly through enterprises, compels me to document. Above all, Jonathan Lippman's deadly phenomenon, seeded through lawless usurpations intrigue me because I serve the living ALMIGHTY, ALL POWERFUL, ALL RIGHTEOUS God and not the god of worship and money in exchange for freedom, health and sovereignty. The above is one of many of Jonathan Lippman’s disguised killing operations. No one could make this up. Jonathan Lippman is operating multiple generational multifaceted disguised killing operations premised off of lawless and deadly usurpations, that kill under disguise effectively. He knows I am probably the only survivor. Consequently, the only one that can do what I am doing and have been doing on behalf of public safety, is me. Consequently, via lawless usurpations, he has masterminded having me wiped off this earth. But, he forgot that ALMIGHTY GOD IS IN CHARGE OF THIS EARTH AND THAT IS THE ONLY REASON I AND MY FAMILY ARE ALIVE. CONSEQUENTLY, I MUST PROCLAIM THE TRUTH AND THE POWER OF ALMIGHTY GOD THAT HAS RESCUED ME FROM MULTIPLE JONATHAN LIPPMAN PATTERNED AND PRACTICED DEADLY PHENONMENON EMBEDDED AND CONTINUED BECAUSE OF DOCUMENTED LAWLESS USURPATION DISREGARD. Research shows that Jonathan Lippman via lawlessly usurped powers and the disregard of such has many disguised killing operations. In fact, it is my sworn testimony that I am under one now, whereas he has lawlessly usurped power in every aspect of my life to leave me to die under the disguise of financial demise. Please note I did not ask for this assignment. Jonathan Lippman’s constant and repeated, inflicted, criminal, life threatening, lawless usurpation patterns and practices required documentation and the ramifications of his global inflicted criminal usurpation pattern and practices require publicity. Jonathan Lippman’s documented criminal usurpations are beyond interferences with state and federal laws, they are disregarded monstrous crimes that have effectuated millions of homicides and I am not next. Malicious lawless usurpations have been inflicted in every aspect of my life with emphasis on the judiciary. This can not be silenced as it should not have occurred. This abuse of power via lawless usurpations is evidenced in my bank accounts, every job I have had, every court case I have had to initiate to regulate and document usurpation crimes. Lawless usurpations have been inflicted on me in a most retaliatory manner and are most obvious at the judiciary level. See attachments. These abuses profoundly violate the public's trust in the judiciary. Jonathan Lippman has had an injection waiting for me in the hospital for 13 years and he had better realize that, that injection will get to him in jail before it ever reaches me. He is mad because his disguised killing operations listed under his name are well financed, expert, and effective. Yet, they have not and will not work over here. Psychotic pathogen administration, coupled with an unregulated 2 billion dollar budget, coupled with documented seditious, defrauding rulings, appeals, amendments, and tendencies, is a formula for Global destruction, fraudulent court and people manipulation and control, under the disguise of a social phenomenon. Finally, I urge every one reading this to demand that congress legislate laws that monitor and control pathogen creation, production, and dissemination, as a public safety method, just like boxers and other people with deadly skills must register. Pathogen regulation public protections must be put in place so the over 13 million people that died in programs listed under Jonathan Lippman’s name, as well as the former American Federation of Teachers Union President, who I forewarned and was killed thereafter under the phenomenon I warned her of, the, Hempstead Public Schools Union lawyer was killed under a pathogen phenomenon after helping negotiate a settlement to offset Jonathan Lippman’s lawless usurpations, the police officer, who died under the hospital’s control in Judge Walker’s case and the many other disguised killing victims I have detailed in my Documentaries will not continue. It is my prayer that investigations of the above disguised killings will be conducted via the hospital, via the doctors assigned to each of the above and via the specialist assigned, where did the specialist come from and their bank accounts since the above killings. This information may relay most useful information. I have studied and researched Jonathan Lippman’s lawless usurpation based Disguised Killing Operations phenomenon very well. They can be further dismantled via people on earth utilizing their God given skills and authority, to make this quote: thine is the Kingdom, thy will be done, on earth as it is in heaven, a reality. Jonathan Lippman and his retinue of demons required exposure. As such, I pray that we the people will restore order back to our governments on earth, where we the people, human beings, have God given authority to build this nation and world pursuant to, in accordance with God’s the Almighty Creator’s laws. In summary, wickedness has been utilized as a method of management, equal protection of the law has been obstructed, non existent, lawlessly usurped and denied because New York State has a documented judicial trespasser/usurper and disguised killer, that has been killing under disguise for years, does not want to stop, is running a pattern of racketeering via grave misuse of one's official position in multiple enterprises, manipulating an unregulated budget as a method of usurpation operation, coupled with exercising powers he does not legitimately possess. Jonathan Lippman’s appeal is a direct act to over throw government. His involving other judges in his unauthorized fiction based amendment is an act of subornation of perjury by procuring another to commit perjury. His unconstitutional appeal and amendment exemplify fraud by a judge, the disregard of his unconstitutional amendment and appeal are racketeering patterns and practices and misprision of treason and felonies. Jonathan Lippman’s lawless acts mount up to felonies of sedition, rebellion against the Constitutional government and the people, aggravating and gross genocide conspiracies, and obstruction of state, federal, and international public protection laws. Above all, as established in US Code Title 10, Section 333, Jonathan Lippman’s LAWLESS USURPATION PATTERNS, PRACTICES, AND AFFILIATIONS HAVE CAUSED SEVERAL DEADLY PUBLIC ATROCITIES AND DISTURBANCES THAT CAN NOT BE OVER LOOKED. Jonathan Lippman titled SOCIAL PHENOMENON must be investigated, while he is arrested for all the crimes in the Levenson matter. Answers as to why is Jonathan Lippman’s name listed as the leadership of documented Genocidal Pathogenic Programs is needed for the public record, on behalf of all of America and public safety across the world. I look forward to Jonathan Lippman’s verified response in the interest of due process, as due process is something I have never had when my incomes were lawlessly usurped multiple times. However, as a good faith courtesy, I am extending it to Jonathan Lippman and look forward to his verified response to this affidavit. The multiple disguised killings via economic lawless usurpations, genocidal lawless usurpations, deadly cancer pathogenic usurpations, court lawless usurpations, bank account lawless usurpations, public education lawless usurpations, lawless teacher union usurpations, criminal investigation and judicial lawless usurpations, all have to stop on behalf of life pursuant to God given rights and authority. Jonathan Lippman has demonstrated a pattern of willful disregard of a judge’s proper role and authority. He has usurped the prerogatives of the legislature repeatedly and has rebelled against his sworn oath that he would defend and support the Constitution, the supreme law of this land which secures equal protection of the laws. I urge each public official to act competently, as Jonathan Lippman’s lawless usurpations demise, not just in the legal systems, but worldwide as exemplified in the attachments. I have attached the following documents: 1. 1 No. 1: Leonard J. Levenson, et al. v. Jonathan Lippman,&c., et al. 2.Some Lawyers For the Poor Refuse Cases, A Jonathan Lippman Design 3.For the Poor, a Lawyer With 1,600 Clients, 4.Jonathan Lippman unauthorized, UNCONSTITUTIONAL, POWER CRAZED, lawless usurpation letter to Allen Hevesi, dated June 7, 2005 5.Jonathan Lippman lawless and unconstitutional usurped power minimization of judicial wrongdoing investigation offices with no Constitutional authority, abusively controlling and silencing judicial wrongdoing investigations. 6.Jonathan Lippman legal Fiction administration and disturbance letter to him dated March 27, 2006 from Andrea Masley. This letter documents the ramifications of unconstitutional, personal gain, power craze, havoc causing, Jonathan Lippman rulings. 7.Jonathan Lippman’s constructed usurpation regulator document dated September 18, 2006, 8.Jonathan Lippman’s patterned lawless usurped powers inflicting lawless income executions and judicial equal protection of the law denial via Jonathan Lippman patterned usurped SYNDER Code, in the judiciary. 9.Jonathan Lippman documentation describing court administration as PHENOMENON, in his Report of the New York State Court System Electronic Filing Pilot Program, 10. Deadly Pathogen Programs listed under Jonathan Lippman’s name and describing deadly pathogen administration as a PHENOMENON. 11. The Constitution of New York 1777, AMERICANS FIGHTING OFF LAWLESS USURPATIONS THAT LAWLESSLY ENSLAVE VIA USURPATIONS AND FICTIONAL ADMINISTRATION This Criminal Complaint Affidavit is a public appeal to arrest Jonathan Lippman’s criminal, lawlessly inflicted and usurped mayhem, turbulence, public obstruction of the peace, inflicted evil, and monstrous obstruction of safety disturbances via lawless and deadly usurpations that are documented in the courts of New York State and in the death rates of programs with his name. See attached. In closing, the attached documents, court records, Jonathan Lippman’s lawless unconstitutional, unauthorized, ungodly, inhumane actions validate the crimes decreed in this complaint which require, mandate, and compel the arrest of Jonathan Lippman’s Global enemy of humankind and humanity lawless and scandalous administration of legal fictions under the disguise of law. This complaint is not personal. It is not against the system. It is on behalf of public safety, the human race living free from inflicted and disregarded deadly, wicked, eugenic, monstrous usurpations disguised as phenomena that have effectuated varied Global and in the United States of America disguised killings and atrocities that could have been and can be prevented. Jonathan Lippman’s lawless actions attaching him to the above statement, as well as the attachments attached, exemplify engagement in conduct prejudicial to the effective and expeditious administration of the business of the courts, conduct detrimental to the safety of human kind, and the disregard of the deadly ramifications of such inflicted heinous crimes, indicates that he is unable to discharge all the duties of office by reason of mental disability and probable insanity. THIS IS AN EXTRA COPY OF THE NOTARIZED PAGE. There is no need to determine whether Jonathan Lippman’s conduct was unlawful (see Penal Law 195.00 [Official Misconduct]; 195.05 [Obstructing Governmental Administration]; 205.50 [Hindering Prosecution]) since, manifestly, behavior that even raises such questions is inconsistent with the role of a judge and brings the judiciary into disrepute. See, Matter of Backal v. Comm. on Judicial Conduct, 87 NY2d 1 (1995); Matter of Gibbons v. Comm. on Judicial Conduct, 98 NY2d 448 (2002). It should not be difficult to arrest, remove and impeach Jonathan Lippman to end his documented lawless judicial usurpations that inflicted and disguised Hitler type atrocities. On behalf of global public safety one must conclude that the sanction of arrest and removal softens the penalties warranted. Above all, I thank God for Equal Protections secured by God. However, it is time that the Equal Protection clause of the United States of America Constitution begins to be enforced on behalf of local and international public safety, public policy, government reform and restoration from Jonathan Lippman damages, and on behalf of humanity. Constitutional protections should have been and must begin to be enforced to arrest these documented, Jonathan Lippman, deadly, public safety, scandalous, wicked, lawless usurpations, inflicted psychotic power and control atrocities. No one is above the law. Jonathan Lippman’s actions appear to be of Fallen Angels' = 'Felon Agents', A Dios! The earth belongs to Almighty Sovereign God the Creator! Thank you. ATTESTATION: I ATTEST TO THE FACT, THAT ON THIS 8TH DAY OF MARCH 2007, I, MIRIAM SNYDER, APPEARED BEFORE THE NOTARY BELOW AND SIGNED THE BELOW, OF MY OWN FREE WILL. I HAVE PREPARED, RESEARCHED, AND SIGNED THIS CRIMINAL COMPLAINT/AFFIDAVIT AND THE STATEMENTS PRESENTED ARE TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE. _____________________________________________ MIRIAM SNYDER, ALL RIGHTS RESERVE PUBLIC AFFIDAVIT DOCUMENTING DEMAND THAT EACH PUBLIC OFFICIAL LISTED ON THE ATTACHED JONATHAN LIPPMAN CRIMINAL COMPLAINT READ ALL OF THE ATTACHED COMPLAINT PLEADINGS AGAINST JONATHAN LIPPMAN AND ADHERE ONLY TO CONSTITUTIONALLY COMPLIANT LAW AND CASE LAW, AND MORE PARTICULARLY, THE BILL OF RIGHTS, IN THE ARREST, REMOVAL AND IMPEACHMENT RULINGS COMES NOW Miriam Snyder, Affiant and respectfully demands that each public official listed on the attached Jonathan Lippman criminal complaint, pursuant to their oaths sworn by and their duties to the Constitution, in any and all proceedings in this complaint: 1.To read, consider, comprehend and rule upon the Jonathan Lippman Judicial Trespass criminal complaint based only in and supported by laws, statutes and case law in agreement with, and not in opposition or contradiction to, the National Constitution, specifically, the Bill of Rights; 2.To honor, uphold and abide by the oaths taken by the public officials, pursuant to the Constitution of the United States of America, Article VI, Clauses 2 and 3, and Constitutional requirements thereof; 3.Pursuant to those oaths, to base and support his arrest, removal and or impeachment in law or case law which is Constitutionally compliant and which will not: (A) deny the powers of and Rights guaranteed in the National Constitution; (B) deny Constitutional Rights to American Citizens, in the instant case, the people of New York State (C) violate federal and/or state Constitutionally compliant laws; (D) shield, exonerate or hold Jonathan Lippman’s trespass and documented criminal and unconstitutional acts as a judge, harmless and immune from violating federal or state laws, federal or State Constitutions, violating New Yorkers Constitutional Rights and Rights of due process of law, wrongdoing(s), crimes, criminal activity(ies), fraud, collusion and conspiracy, insurrection, sedition and anarchy. 4.To acknowledge that American Citizens, in the instant case, People living in New York State, are Sovereign in this Nation, and that the government, this, and other entities of government serve the American Citizens pursuant to: (A) limited powers delegated from the Constitution, which delegated powers are derived from the People; (B) oaths taken to uphold the Constitution; (C) the Constitution, specifically, the Bill of Rights; (D) powers authorized only by the Constitution or laws in full compliance therewith, specifically, the Bill of Rights, and (E) acknowledge that lack of Constitutional authority precludes any action and voids any ruling by Jonathan Lippman and or any other public servant imposture. Wherefore, since the Constitution is the Supreme Law of this Land, to which each public official is sworn, Affiant, Miriam Snyder, respectfully demands these Honorable Public Officials to exercise Constitutionally required power to arrest, remove and impeach, accordingly, Jonathan Lippman, for his documented lawless usurpations, unconstitutional acts and rulings against the people of New York, with particularity to his documented unconstitutional criminal usurpations documented in : 1 NO. 1: LEONARD J. LEVENSON, ET AL. V. JONATHAN LIPPMAN,&C., ET AL.. The below are some of Jonathan Lippman’s documented criminal acts that mandate, authorize and require this criminal complaint and his arrest, removal and impeachment accordingly: •CONSPIRACY TO OFFEND AND DEFRAUD THE UNITED STATES, 18 USC SEC 371, •PERJURY AGAINST HIS OATH OF OFFICE BY SUBSCRIBING TO A MATERIAL HE KNOWS TO BE FALSE, 18 USC SEC. 1621 • • EXTRA PAGE •INSURRECTION AGAINST THE CONSTITUTION BY INCITING, ASSISSTING, AND ENGAGING IN REBELLION AGAINST THE CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITY OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ,18 USC SEC 2383 •SEDITION/SEDITIOUS CONSPIRACY BY CONSPIRING TO OVERTHROW THE CONSTITUTIONAL GOVERNMENT OR DELAY THE EXECUTION OF A LAW OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 18 USC SEC 2384 •IMPEDING DUE EXERCISE OF RIGHTS BY ATTEMPTING TO PREVENT, OBSTRUCT, IMPEDE, AND INTERFERE WITH SAME, 18 USC SEC 1509, •SUBORNATION OF PERJURY BY PROCURING ANOTHER TO COMMIT PERJURY ,(18 USC SEC. 1622 ) Affiant, Miriam Snyder respectfully requests that each Public Official listed in Jonathan Lippman’s criminal complaint read the complaint vigilantly and rule based in and supported by the federal Constitution, for the aforesaid reasons, to honor and uphold the Constitution and rule based only in law and case law compliant with, and not in opposition or contradictory to, the Constitution. Respectfully submitted, All Rights Reserved ________________________________ Miriam Snyder 516 642-6007 SUPREMACY The supremacy clause, United States Constitutional Article VI declares that all laws made in pursuance of the Constitution and all treaties made under the authority of the United States shall be the supreme law of the land and shall enjoy legal superiority over any conflicting provision of a State constitution or law. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I certify that on this 8TH day of March, 2007, a true and exact copy of the above Affidavit and Jonathan Lippman Criminal Complaint Affidavit of Truth was sent, first class postage prepaid, by U.S. mail, to Independent Ministers Across The Country Chief Judge Judith Kaye 230 Park Avenue, Suite 826 New York City, New York 10169-0007 John Conyers, Committee on the Judiciary US House of Representatives Washington Office 2426 RHOB Washington, D.C. 20515-2214 Maxine Waters, Committee on the Judiciairy US House of Representatives 2138 Rayburn House Office Building Washington, DC 20515 Charles Schumer U.S. Senator 757 Third Avenue New York, New York 10017 Hillary Clinton, U.S. Senator 780 3rd Avenue New York, New York 10017 Robert Johnson Bronx District Attorney 198 East 161st Bronx, New York 10451 Andrew Cuomo, NYS Attorney General 120 Broadway New York, New York 10271 NYC Mayor Bloomberg 100 Church Street New York, New York 10007 Rose Gill Hearn, Commissioner City of New York Department of Investigation 80 Maiden Lane New York, New York 10038 Raoul Lionel Felder, Administrator New York State Commission on Judicial Conduct NOTARIZED COPY EXTRA PAGE 61 Broadway New York, New York 1006 Jonathan Lippman Disguised Killer and Judicial Trespasser 25 Beaver Street New York, New York 10004 All Rights Reserved _________________________________ Miriam Snyder, American ______________________________________________________________ MORANDUM OF LAW SUPPORTING THE ATTACHED VERIFIED CRIMINAL COMPLAINT/AFFIDAVIT OF TRUTH AGAINST NYS CHIEF ADMINISTRATOR JUDICIAL TRESPASSER JONATHAN LIPPMAN MIRIAM SNYDER MARCH 8, 2007 JONATHAN LIPPMAN’S PUBLIC CRIME LIST CHARGES: • CONSPIRACY TO OFFEND AND DEFRAUD THE UNITED STATES, ( 18 USC SEC 371), EX:THE BELOW MENTIONED LEVENSON MATTER, JONATHAN LIPPMAN’S UNCONSTITUTIONAL INVALID RULE 127, HIS APPEAL, HIS RULINGS IN CONFLICT WITH THE SUPREMACY CLAUSE, UNCONSTITUIONAL USURPED COURT AND LEGISLATIVE POWERS AND THE ATTACHED PATHOGEN PROGRAMS LISTED UNDER JONATHAN LIPPMAN’S NAME AND TITLE AS A PHENOMENON, •PERJURY AGAINST HIS OATH OF OFFICE BY SUBSCRIBING TO A MATERIAL HE KNOWS TO BE FALSE, ( 18 USC SEC. 1621), EX: JONATHAN LIPPMAN’S APPEAL IN THE LEVENSON MATTER, •INSURRECTION AGAINST THE CONSTITUTION BY INCITING, ASSISSTING, AND ENGAGING IN REBELLION AGAINST THE CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITY OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ( 18 USC SEC 2383) EX: JONATHAN LIPPMAN’S RULE 127.B, HIS AMENDMENT, HIS APPEAL AND RULINGS IN THE ATTACHMENTS, JONATHAN LIPPMAN’S ATTACHED PUBLIC REDORD APPELLATE DIVISION DOCUMENTED LAWLESS USURPATIONS, •SEDITION/SEDITIOUS CONSPIRACY BY CONSPIRING TO OVERTHROW THE CONSTITUTIONAL GOVERNMENT OR DELAY THE EXECUTION OF A LAW OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ( 18 USC SEC 2384 ) EX: JONATHAN LIPPMAN’S RULE 127.B, HIS LAWLESSLY USURPED AND UNCONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT, APPEAL AND RULINGS IN THE ATTACHMENTS, JONATHAN LIPPMAN’S ATTACHED PUBLIC RECORD LAWLESS USURPATIONS AND APPEAL, •IMPEDING DUE EXERCISE OF RIGHTS BY ATTEMPTING TO PREVENT, OBSTRUCT, IMPEDE, AND INTERFERE WITH SAME, (18 USC SEC 1509) EX: JONATHAN LIPPMAN’S LAWLESS USURPATION LAWLESSLY IMPEDED AND OBSTRUCTED THE ASISTANCE OF COUNSELCONSTITUTIONALLY REQUIRED PROGRAM AND PAYMENT PLAN, •SUBORNATION OF PERJURY BY PROCURING ANOTHER TO COMMIT PERJURY ,(18 USC SEC. 1622 ) EX: JONATHAN LIPPMAN ENJOINING SUBORDINATE JUDGES IN HIS LEGAL FICTION ADMINISTRATION VIA ENFORCING HIS PUBLIC DISTURBANCE UNAUTHORIZED LAWLESS USURPED UNCONSTITUTIONAL RULE 127, WITH NO CONSTITUTIONAL VALIDITY EFFECTUATING MULTIPLE PUBLIC PROTEST LAWSUITS CONSOLIDATED INTO THE LEVENSON MATTER, •FRAUD BY A JUDGE BY MAKING A FALSE REPRESENTATION, WRITING A FALSE DOCUMENT OR HAVING KNOWLEDGE THAT A DOCUMENT IS FALSE, MAKING A FALSE DECLARATION BEFORE A UNITED STATES COURT (18 USC SEC 1623 ), EX: JONATHAN LIPPMAN’S APPEAL IN THE LEVENSON MATTER, •RACKETEERING BY CONDUCTING AN ONGOING ENTERPRISE OF BRIBERY, EXTORTION, OR THREATS OF SAME, (18 U.S.C. SEC. 1962); EX: JONATHAN LIPPMAN’S SECOND CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS DECISION IN CONFLICT WITH THE SUPREMACY CLAUSE AND THE ATTACHED PATHOGENIC RACQUETEERING ENTERPRISES LISTED UNDER HIS NAME, •CONSPIRACY AGAINST RIGHTS OF SOVERIEGN, FREE, GOD CREATED, CITIZENS, ( 18, SECTION 241 ) EX: OVER 13 MILLION DEADHERE AND ABROAD UNDER HIS NAME AND PATHOGENIC LEADERSHIP, PUBLIC PROTESTS VIA MULTIPLE LAWSUITS FILED AGAINST JONATHAN LIPPMAN’S USURPED UNCONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT, CONSOLIDATED INTO THE LEVENSON LAW SUIT, • U.S. CODE TITLE 10, SECTION 333, INTERFERENCE WITH STATE AND FEDERAL LAWS , EX: THE DISREGARD OF JONATHAN LIPPMAN’S DOCUMENTED PUBLIC RECORD LAWLESS USURPED PUBLIC DISTURBANCE UNAUTHORIZED AMENDMENT WHICH EFFECTUATED MULTIPLE PUBLIC PROTEST LAWSUITS AND DISTURBANCES IS A DIRECT INTERFERENCE AND OBSTRUCTION OF STATE AND FEDERAL LAWS. THE LACK OF CONSTITUTIONAL EQUAL PROTECTIONS HAS EFFECTUATED OVER 13 MILLION INNOCENT PEOPLE DEAD UNDER A JONATHAN LIPPMAN TITLED PHENOMENON. JONATHAN LIPPMAN’S FICTIONAL ADMINISTRATION, COUPLED WITH LAWLESS UNRESTRAINED USURPATIONS, IS AN OBSTRUCTION WITH STATE AND FEDERAL LAWS AND HAS CAUSED PUBLIC DISTURBANCE MULTIPLE LAWSUITS. THE DISREGARD OF SUCH, AS WELL AS THE DISREGARD OF EQUAL PROTECTIONS SECURED BY GOD AND THE CONSTITUTION REQUIRE INTERVENTION, •ADVOCATING OVERTHROW OF GOVERNMENT, (18 U.S.C. SEC. 1962) EX: JONATHAN LIPPMAN’S APPEAL, RULINGS, LAWLESS PUBLIC RECORD DOCUMENTED USURPATIONS AND AMMENDMENTS WITH NO CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITY IN THE ATTACHED LEVENSON MATTER AND ATTACHMENTS, •GENOCIDE; (B) CONSPIRACY TO COMMIT GENOCIDE; (C) DIRECT AND PUBLIC INCITEMENT TO COMMIT GENOCIDE; (D) ATTEMPT TO COMMIT GENOCIDE; (E) COMPLICITY IN GENOCIDE, EXAMPLE: THE ATTACHED GENOCIDAL DEADLY PATHOGEN PROGRAMS LISTED UNDER JONATHAN LIPPMAN’S NAME AND TITLE AS PHENOMENON COMMITTED WITH INTENT TO DEFRAUD AND DESTROY, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, A NATIONAL, ETHNICAL, RACIAL OR RELIGIOUS GROUP AS SUCH: (A) KILLING MEMBERS OF THE GROUP; (B) CAUSING SERIOUS BODILY OR MENTAL HARM TO MEMBERS OF THE GROUP; (C) DELIBERATELY INFLICTING ON THE GROUP CONDITIONS OF LIFE CALCULATED TO BRING ABOUT ITS PHYSICAL DESTRUCTION IN WHOLE OR IN PART; (D) IMPOSING MEASURES INTENDED TO PREVENT BIRTHS WITHIN THE GROUP; TITLE 18 PART I CHAPTER 1 4 4. MISPRISION OF FELONY Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the United States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same to some judge or other person in civil or military authority under the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both. TITLE 18 PART I CHAPTER 115 2382 2382. MISPRISION OF TREASON Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States and having knowledge of the commission of any treason against them, conceals and does not, as soon as may be, disclose and make known the same to the President or to some judge of the United States, or to the governor or to some judge or justice of a particular State, is guilty of misprision of treason and shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than seven years, or both. TITLE 18 PART I CHAPTER 115 2383 2383. REBELLION OR INSURRECTION Whoever incites, sets on foot, assists, or engages in any rebellion or insurrection against the authority of the United States or the laws thereof, or gives aid or comfort thereto, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States. TITLE 18 PART I CHAPTER 115 2384 2384. SEDITIOUS CONSPIRACY If two or more persons in any State or Territory, or in any place subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, conspire to overthrow, put down, or to destroy by force the Government of the United States, or to levy war against them, or to oppose by force the authority thereof, or by force to prevent, hinder, or delay the execution of any law of the United States, or by force to seize, take, or possess any property of the United States contrary to the authority thereof, they shall each be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both. TITLE 18 PART I CHAPTER 115 2385 2385. ADVOCATING OVERTHROW OF GOVERNMENT Whoever knowingly or willfully advocates, abets, advises, or teaches the duty, necessity, desirability, or propriety of overthrowing or destroying the government of the United States or the government of any State, Territory, District or Possession thereof, or the government of any political subdivision therein, by force or violence, or by the assassination of any officer of any such government; or Whoever, with intent to cause the overthrow or destruction of any such government, prints, publishes, edits, issues, circulates, sells, distributes, or publicly displays any written or printed matter advocating, advising, or teaching the duty, necessity, desirability, or propriety of overthrowing or destroying any government in the United States by force or violence, or attempts to do so; or Whoever organizes or helps or attempts to organize any society, group, or assembly of persons who teach, advocate, or encourage the overthrow or destruction of any such government by force or violence; or becomes or is a member of, or affiliates with, any such society, group, or assembly of persons, knowing the purposes thereof Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both, and shall be ineligible for employment by the United States or any department or agency thereof, for the five years next following his conviction. If two or more persons conspire to commit any offense named in this section, each shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both, and shall be ineligible for employment by the United States or any department or agency thereof, for the five years next following his conviction. As used in this section, the terms “organizes” and “organize”, with respect to any society, group, or assembly of persons, include the recruiting of new members, the forming of new units, and the regrouping or expansion of existing clubs, classes, and other units of such society, group, or assembly of persons. TITLE 18 PART I CHAPTER 19 371 371. CONSPIRACY TO COMMIT OFFENSE OR TO DEFRAUD UNITED STATES If two or more persons conspire either to commit any offense against the United States, or to defraud the United States, or any agency thereof in any manner or for any purpose, and one or more of such persons do any act to effect the object of the conspiracy, each shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both. If, however, the offense, the commission of which is the object of the conspiracy, is a misdemeanor only, the punishment for such conspiracy shall not exceed the maximum punishment provided for such misdemeanor. TITLE 18 PART I CHAPTER 79 1621 1621. PERJURY GENERALLY Whoever (1) having taken an oath before a competent tribunal, officer, or person, in any case in which a law of the United States authorizes an oath to be administered, that he will testify, declare, depose, or certify truly, or that any written testimony, declaration, deposition, or certificate by him subscribed, is true, willfully and contrary to such oath states or subscribes any material matter which he does not believe to be true; or (2) in any declaration, certificate, verification, or statement under penalty of perjury as permitted under section 1746 of title 28, united states code, willfully subscribes as true any material matter which he does not believe to be true; is guilty of perjury and shall, except as otherwise expressly provided by law, be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both. This section is applicable whether the statement or subscription is made within or without the United States. TITLE 18 PART I CHAPTER 79 1622 1622. SUBORNATION OF PERJURY Whoever procures another to commit any perjury is guilty of subornation of perjury, and shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both. TITLE 18 PART I CHAPTER 115 2384 2384. SEDITIOUS CONSPIRACY If two or more persons in any State or Territory, or in any place subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, conspire to overthrow, put down, or to destroy by force the Government of the United States, or to levy war against them, or to oppose by force the authority thereof, or by force to prevent, hinder, or delay the execution of any law of the United States, or by force to seize, take, or possess any property of the United States contrary to the authority thereof, they shall each be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both. T ITLE 18 PART I CHAPTER 73 1509 18 USC 1509. OBSTRUCTION OF COURT ORDERS Whoever, by threats or force, willfully prevents, obstructs, impedes, or interferes with, or willfully attempts to prevent, obstruct, impede, or interfere with, the due exercise of rights or the performance of duties under any order, judgment, or decree of a court of the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both. No injunctive or other civil relief against the conduct made criminal by this section shall be denied on the ground that such conduct is a crime. TITLE 18 PART I CHAPTER 73 1505. Obstruction of proceedings before departments, agencies, and committees. TITLE 18 PART I CHAPTER 79 1623 1623. FALSE DECLARATIONS BEFORE GRAND JURY OR COURT (a) Whoever under oath (or in any declaration, certificate, verification, or statement under penalty of perjury as permitted under section 1746 of title 28, United States Code) in any proceeding before or ancillary to any court or grand jury of the United States knowingly makes any false material declaration or makes or uses any other information, including any book, paper, document, record, recording, or other material, knowing the same to contain any false material declaration, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both. (b) This section is applicable whether the conduct occurred within or without the United States. (c) An indictment or information for violation of this section alleging that, in any proceedings before or ancillary to any court or grand jury of the United States, the defendant under oath has knowingly made two or more declarations, which are inconsistent to the degree that one of them is necessarily false, need not specify which declaration is false if (1) each declaration was material to the point in question, and (2) each declaration was made within the period of the statute of limitations for the offense charged under this section. In any prosecution under this section, the falsity of a declaration set forth in the indictment or information shall be established sufficient for conviction by proof that the defendant while under oath made irreconcilably contradictory declarations material to the point in question in any proceeding before or ancillary to any court or grand jury. It shall be a defense to an indictment or information made pursuant to the first sentence of this subsection that the defendant at the time he made each declaration believed the declaration was true. Where, in the same continuous court or grand jury proceeding in which a declaration is made, the person making the declaration admits such declaration to be false, such admission shall bar prosecution under this section if, at the time the admission is made, the declaration has not substantially affected the proceeding, or it has not become manifest that such falsity has been or will be exposed. (e) Proof beyond a reasonable doubt under this section is sufficient for conviction. It shall not be necessary that such proof be made by any particular number of witnesses or by documentary or other type of evidence. TITLE 18 PART I CHAPTER 96 1962 1962. PROHIBITED ACTIVITIES: RACKETEERING (a) It shall be unlawful for any person who has received any income derived, directly or indirectly, from a pattern of racketeering activity or through collection of an unlawful debt in which such person has participated as a principal within the meaning of section 2, title 18, United States Code, to use or invest, directly or indirectly, any part of such income, or the proceeds of such income, in acquisition of any interest in, or the establishment or operation of, any enterprise which is engaged in, or the activities of which affect, interstate or foreign commerce. A purchase of securities on the open market for purposes of investment, and without the intention of controlling or participating in the control of the issuer, or of assisting another to do so, shall not be unlawful under this subsection if the securities of the issuer held by the purchaser, the members of his immediate family, and his or their accomplices in any pattern or racketeering activity or the collection of an unlawful debt after such purchase do not amount in the aggregate to one percent of the outstanding securities of any one class, and do not confer, either in law or in fact, the power to elect one or more directors of the issuer. (b) It shall be unlawful for any person through a pattern of racketeering activity or through collection of an unlawful debt to acquire or maintain, directly or indirectly, any interest in or control of any enterprise which is engaged in, or the activities of which affect, interstate or foreign commerce. (c) It shall be unlawful for any person employed by or associated with any enterprise engaged in, or the activities of which affect, interstate or foreign commerce, to conduct or participate, directly or indirectly, in the conduct of such enterprise’s affairs through a pattern of racketeering activity or collection of unlawful debt. (d) It shall be unlawful for any person to conspire to violate any of the provisions of subsection (a), (b), or (c) of this section. TITLE 18 PART I CHAPTER 13 241 241. CONSPIRACY AGAINST RIGHTS If two or more persons conspire to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or because of his having so exercised the same; or If two or more persons go in disguise on the highway, or on the premises of another, with intent to prevent or hinder his free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege so secured. They shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, they shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death. TITLE 10 Subtitle A PART I CHAPTER 15 333. Interference with State and Federal law The President, by using the militia or the armed forces, or both, or by any other means, shall take such measures as he considers necessary to suppress, in a State, any insurrection, domestic violence, unlawful combination, or conspiracy, if it (1) so hinders the execution of the laws of that State, and of the United States within the State, that any part or class of its people is deprived of a right, privilege, immunity, or protection named in the Constitution and secured by law, and the constituted authorities of that State are unable, fail, or refuse to protect that right, privilege, or immunity, or to give that protection; or (2) opposes or obstructs the execution of the laws of the United States or impedes the course of justice under those laws. In any situation covered by clause (1), the State shall be considered to have denied the equal protection of the laws secured by the Constitution. AUTHORITY: CHAPTER 15 OF TITLE 10 U.S.C. (10 U.S.C. 331 ET SEQ.). Source: 37 FR 3637, Feb. 18, 1972, unless otherwise noted. 215.1 Purpose and scope. This part establishes uniform Department of Defense policies, assigns responsibilities, and furnishes general guidance for utilizing DoD military and civilian personnel, facilities, equipment or supplies: (a) In support of civil authorities during civil disturbances within the 50 States, District of Columbia, Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, U.S. possessions and territories, or any political subdivision thereof. (b) In other related instances where military resources may be used to protect life or Federal property or to prevent disruption of Federal functions. 215.2 Applicability. This part is applicable to all components of the Department of Defense (the Military Departments, Organization of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Defense Agencies, and the unified and specified commands) having cognizance over military resources which may be utilized in accordance with the policies set forth herein. 215.3 Definitions. (a) Civil disturbances are group acts of violence and disorders prejudicial to public law and order within the 50 States, District of Columbia, Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, U.S. possessions and territories, or any political subdivision thereof. The term civil disturbance includes all domestic conditions requiring the use of Federal armed forces pursuant to the provisions of chapter 15 of Title 10, United States Code. (b) Federal property is that property which is owned, leased, possessed, or occupied by the Federal Government. (c) Military resources include military and civilian personnel, facilities, equipment, and supplies under the control of a DOD component. (d) A Federal function is any function, operation, or action carried out under the laws of the United States by any department, agency, or instrumentality of the United States or by an officer or employee thereof. 215.4 Legal considerations. (a) Under the Constitution and laws of the United States, the protection of life and property and the maintenance of public order are primarily the responsibilities of State and local governments, which have the necessary authority to enforce the laws. The Federal Government may assume this responsibility and this authority only in certain limited instances. (b) Aside from the constitutional limitations of the power of the Federal Government at the local level, there are additional legal limits upon the use of military forces within the United States. The most important of these from a civil disturbance standpoint is the Posse Comitatus Act (18 U.S.C. 1385), which prohibits the use of any part of the Army or the Air Force to execute or enforce the laws, except as authorized by the Constitution or Act of Congress. (c) The Constitution and Acts of Congress establish six exceptions, generally applicable within the entire territory of the United States, to which the Posse Comitatus Act prohibition does not apply. (1) The constitutional exceptions are two in number and are based upon the inherent legal right of the U.S. Governmenta sovereign national entity under the Federal Constitutionto insure the preservation of public order and the carrying out of governmental operations within its territorial limits, by force if necessary. (i) The emergency authority. Authorities prompt and vigorous Federal action, including use of military forces, to prevent loss of life or wanton destruction of property and to restore governmental functioning and public order when sudden and unexpected civil disturbances, disasters, or calamities seriously endanger life and property and disrupt normal governmental functions to such an extent that duly constituted local authorities are unable to control the situations. (ii) Protection of Federal property and functions. Authorizes Federal action, including the use of military forces, to protect Federal property and Federal governmental functions when the need for protection exists and duly constituted local authorities are unable or decline to provide adequate protection. (2) There are four exceptions to the Posse Comitatus Act based on Acts of Congress. (i) In the cases of each of the first three of those described, paragraphs (c)(2)(i) (a), (b), and (c) of this section, personal Presidential action, including the issuance of a proclamation calling upon insurgents to disperse and retire peaceably within a limited time, is a prerequisite. (a) 10 U.S.C. 331. Authorizes use of the militia and Armed Forces when a State is unable to control domestic violence, and a request for Federal assistance has been made by the State legislature or governor to the President. Implements Article IV, section 4, of the Constitution. (b) 10 U.S.C. 332. Authorizes use of the militia and Armed Forces to enforce Federal law when unlawful obstructions or rebellion against the authority of the United States renders ordinary enforcement means unworkable. Implements Article II, section 3, of the Constitution. (c) 10 U.S.C. 333. Authorizes use of the militia and Armed Forces when domestic violence or conspiracy hinders execution of State or Federal law, and a State cannot or will not protect the constitutional rights of the citizens. Implements Article II, section 3, and the 14th Amendment of the Constitution. (d) House Joint Resolution 1292, June 6, 1968. 1 Directs all departments of the Government, upon the request of the Secret Service, to assist that Service in carrying out its statutory duties to protect Government officials and major political candidates from physical harm. Assistance to the Secret Service is governed by DoD Directive 3025.13, “Employment of Department of Defense Resources in Support of the United States Secret Service,” July 15, 1968. 2 1 Although this resolution has been placed in the Statutes at Large as Public Law 90331, 82 Stat. 170, it has not been codified; it is set out in the notes to 18 U.S.C. 3056. 2 Filed as part of original copies available from U.S. Naval Publications and Forms Center, 5801 Tabor Avenue, Philadelphia, PA 19120, Code: 300. (ii) It should be noted that none of the above authorities, in and of itself, provides sufficient legal basis to order members of the Reserve components to active Federal service. 215.5 Policies. (a) The employment of DoD military resources for assistance to civil authorities in controlling civil disturbances will normally be predicated upon the issuance of a Presidential Executive order or Presidential directive authorizing and directing the Secretary of Defense to provide for the restoration of law and order in a specific State or locality. Exceptions to this condition will be limited to: (1) Cases of sudden and unexpected emergencies as described in 215.4(c)(1)(i), which require that immediate military action be taken. (2) Providing military resources to civil authorities as prescribed in 215.9 of this part. (b) The Attorney General of the United States has been designated to receive and coordinate preliminary requests from States for Federal military assistance authorized by 10 U.S.C. 331 (215.4(c)(2)(i)(a)). Formal requests from States for such aid will be made to the President, who will determine what Federal action will be taken. (c) The Secretary of the Army is delegated any and all of the authority of the President under chapter 15 of title 10, U.S.C. (215.4(c)(2)(i) (a), (b), and (c)) which has been or may be hereafter delegated by the President to the Secretary of Defense. (d) The Secretary of the Navy and the Secretary of the Air Force are delegated all that authority which has been or may be hereafter delegated by the President to the Secretary of Defense to order to active duty, units and members of the Reserve Components under their respective jurisdictions, except National Guard units and members, for use pursuant to chapter 15 of title 10, U.S.C. (215.4(c)(2)(i) (a), (b), and (c)). (e) DoD components and their subordinate activities will coordinate with local civil authorities or local military commanders as appropriate, to assure mutual understanding of the policies and procedures to be adhered to in an actual or anticipated civil disturbance situation. (f) DoD civilian employees generally should not be used to assist civil authorities in connection with civil disturbances, except as provided for in 215.9(b)(3). (g) The propositioning of more than a battalion-sized unit, as authorized in 215.6(a) (6), will be undertaken only with the approval of the President. Requests for the propositioning of forces will be addressed to the Attorney General. 215.6 Responsibilities. (a) The Secretary of the Army is designated as the Executive Agent for the Department of Defense in all matters pertaining to the planning for, and the deployment and employment of military resources in the event of civil disturbances. As DoD Executive Agent, the Secretary of the Army (or the Under Secretary of the Army, as his designee) is responsible for: (1) Providing policy and direction concerning plans, procedures, and requirements to all DoD components having cognizance over military resources which may be employed under the provisions of this part. (2) Improving and evaluating the capabilities of the National Guard to deal with civil disturbances. (3) Establishing DoD policies and procedures for: (i) Calling the National Guard to active Federal service and ordering the National Guard and other Reserve components to active duty; and (ii) The employment of such forces that may be required to carry out the purposes of this part. (4) Calling to active Federal service: (i) The Army National Guard units or members required to carry out the provisions of the Presidential Executive order or other appropriate authority. (ii) The Air National Guard units or members required to carry out the provisions of the Presidential Executive order or other appropriate authority, subject to the provisions of paragraph (c)(1)(i) of this section. (5) Providing military resources of the U.S. Army, consistent with defense priorities to include: (i) The military resources of the Army National Guard called to active Federal service under the provisions of paragraph (a)(4)(i) of this section. (ii) The military resources of the Army Reserve (other than Army National Guard) ordered to active duty to carry out the purposes of this part. (6) Exercising through designated military commanders the direction of military resources committed or assigned for employment in the event of actual or potential civil disturbances. When circumstances warrant, such direction will include: (i) Alerting, and, if necessary, prepositioning predesignated ground forces; and (ii) Directing the Secretary of the Air Force to alert and provide the necessary airlift resources (see 215.5(g)). (7) Devising command, control, and communications arrangements to insure effective coordination and responsiveness among Defense agencies, military departments, the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and Commanders-in-Chief (CINCs) of unified and specified commands, under conditions of prepositioning, deployment, or employment of military resources. Maximum utilization will be made of existing reports of the Joint Reporting Structure (JRS), as prescribed in JCS Pub 6. 3 Arrangements and reports affecting commanders of unified and specified commands will be coordinated with the JCS. 3 Not available to the public. Copies have been distributed to appropriate military commanders. (8) Promulgating in implementation of DoD Directive 5200.27, “Acquisition of Information Concerning Persons and Organizations not Affiliated with the Department of Defense,” March 1, 1971, 1 strict policy guidelines designed to restrict to the maximum extent consistent with the effective conduct of actual civil disturbance operations the collection and maintenance of intelligence data in support of military civil disturbance planning and operations within the Department of Defense. (9) Keeping the Secretary of Defense informed of unusual military resource requirements (actual or potential) and other significant developments in connection with civil disturbance planning and operations. (10) Establishing procedures for the review and coordination of all DoD components' directives, instructions, and plans affecting civil disturbance planning and operations to assure conformity with DoD policies stated herein and DoD Executive Agent policies. (11) Providing for the establishment of a DoD Civil Disturbance Steering Committee and a Directorate of Military Support (see 215.8). (12) Providing the necessary facilities, equipment, and personnel as required by the Assistant Secretary of Defense (Public Affairs) in the accomplishment of his public affairs responsibilities set forth in paragraph (f) of this section. (13) Within the restrictions established by DoD Directive 5200.27, “Acquisition of Information Concerning Persons and Organizations not Affiliated with the Department of Defense,” March 1, 1971, 1 and the implementing guidelines referred to in paragraph (a)(8) of this section, providing essential planning, operational, and intelligence data to the National Military Command Center (NMCC) and the military service command centers on a timely basis to insure that the National Command Authorities and appropriate military service command authorities are adequately informed. 1 See footnote 1 to 215.4(c)(2)(i)(d). (b) The Joint Chiefs of Staff are responsible for: (1) Establishing procedures that will promptly transfer military resources that are assigned to unified and specified commands (i) to the military departments for civil disturbance operations in the Continental United States (CONUS) or (ii) to unified commands for such operations outside the CONUS, as directed by the DoD Executive Agent and consistent with defense priorities. (2) Maintaining an appropriate strategic reserve for worldwide employment and contingency operations. (3) Insuring that directives concerning civil disturbances are issued to the commanders of unified commands, for the employment of military resources outside the CONUS, in accordance with direction and guidance provided by the DoD Executive Agent. (c) The Secretary of the Air Force is responsible for: (1) Providing military resources of the U.S. Air Force, as required by the DoD Executive Agent and consistent with defense priorities, to include: (i) Designating and providing the specific units or members of the Air National Guard to be called to active Federal service under the provisions of paragraph (a)(4)(ii) of this section. (ii) Designating and providing the military resources of the Air Force Reserve (other than Air National Guard) order to active duty to carry out the purposes of this part. (2) Exercising for the DoD Executive Agent, through designated military commanders, coordinating authority over and direction of DoD provided military and commercial obligated airlift resources used to fulfill civil disturbance airlift requirements. (3) Providing airlift to deploy and redeploy civil disturbance forces and for supply, resupply, and aero medical evacuation. (d) The Secretary of the Navy is responsible for: (1) Designating and providing military resources of the U.S. Navy and the U.S. Marine Corps, as required by the DoD Executive Agent and consistent with defense priorities, to include ordering to active duty and utilizing the resources of the Naval Reserve and the Marine Corps Reserve required to carry out the purposes of this directive. (2) Insuring that Navy and Marine forces committed in connection with civil disturbances are trained and equipped in accordance with criteria established by the DoD Executive Agent. (3) Making airlift resources available to the Secretary of the Air Force, consistent with defense priorities, as requested by him in the accomplishment of his airlift responsibilities set forth in paragraph (c) of this section. (e) The Defense agencies are responsible for providing military resources as required, and advice and assistance on matters within their spheres of responsibility, to the DoD Executive Agent and to the Secretaries of the military departments and to the Joint Chiefs of Staff in the discharge of their responsibilities. (f) The Assistant Secretary of Defense (Public Affairs) is responsible for all DoD public affairs matters related to civil disturbances. To assure efficiency and responsiveness in keeping the public fully informed, he will: (1) Provide direction and guidance to the DoD Executive Agent on all aspects of public release of information relating to civil disturbances. (2) Assign Public Affairs representatives, of appropriate rank, to the Directorate of Military Support during civil disturbance operations. (3) Designate as required onsite DoD Public Affairs Chiefs who will furnish appropriate advice and guidance to task force commanders and, upon request or by direction of appropriate authorities, to other representatives of the Federal Government. The onsite Public Affairs Chief is responsible for releasing all military information to the public in the affected area(s). He will be responsible for such other public affairs functions as directed by competent authority. In the event of a disagreement concerning the releasing of military information to the public between a task force commander and the onsite Public Affairs Chief, the issue will be resolved by the ASD(PA) who will coordinate with the DoD Executive Agent to the extent feasible. 215.7 Command relationships. (a) In the event of civil disturbances within the CONUS: (1) Military resources of the unified or specified commands will be transferred by the JCS to their respective military departments, when directed by the DoD Executive Agent. (Such resources will revert to the unified or specified commands when directed by the DoD Executive Agent.) (2) The DoD Executive Agent is delegated the authority to exercise, through the Chief of Staff, U.S. Army, the direction of those forces assigned or committed to him by the military departments. (b) In the event of civil disturbances outside of CONUS, the DoD Executive Agent is delegated the authority to exercise the direction of those forces assigned or committed to the commanders of unified or specified commands through the Chief of Staff, U.S. Army, and Task Force Commanders designated by JCS. (c) At objective areas, designated task force commanders will exercise operational control over all military forces assigned for employment in the event of civil disturbances. 215.8 Organization and administration. (a) A DoD Civil Disturbance Steering Committee will be established to provide advice and assistance to the DoD Executive Agent concerning civil disturbance matters. The Committee Chairman will be the Under Secretary of the Army. Members will include: Deputy Attorney General of the United States. Assistant Secretaries of Defense (Comptroller) and (Public Affairs). General Counsel of the DoD. Under Secretaries of the Navy and Air Force. Vice Chiefs of Staff of the Army and Air Force. Vice Chief of Naval Operations and Assistant Commandant of the Marine Corps. Representative of the JCS. (b) A Directorate of Military Support (DOM's) will be established by the DoD Executive Agent with a joint service staff under the Chief of Staff, U.S. Army. The Department of the Army will provide the Director and the Department of the Air Force will provide the Deputy Director. The DOMs will plan, coordinate, and direct civil disturbance operations. 215.9 Providing military resources to civil authorities. This section provides general guidance for the handling of requests for DoD facilities, personnel, equipment, or supplies, received from officials of the 50 States, District of Columbia, Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, U.S. possessions and territories, or any political subdivision thereof, for use in connection with civil disturbances. (a) Loan policy. Civil authorities, National Guard, and Federal agencies will be encouraged to provide sufficient resources of their own, so as to minimize the need to rely on DoD assistance. (1) Classification of resources. Military resources will be classified into three groups, as follows: (i) Group One. Personnel, arms, ammunition, tank-automotive equipment, and aircraft. (ii) Group Two. Riot control agents, concertina wire, and other like military equipment to be employed in control of civil disturbances which is not included in Group One. (iii) Group Three. Firefighting resources (to include operating personnel); equipment of a protective nature (such as masks, helmets, body armor vests) and other equipment not included in Group One or Two (such as clothing, communications equipment, searchlights); and the use of DoD facilities. (2) Requests for personnel to be used in a direct law enforcement role are not within the purview of this part and must be made by the legislature or governor of a State in accordance with 10 U.S.C. 331. Pursuant to the Posse Comitatus Act, DoD operating personnel employed in connection with loaned equipment may not be used in a direct law enforcement role. (3) Repair parts and POL items are classified according to the group of the equipment for which the parts or POL are intended. (b) Approval of requests. (1) Requests for Group One military resources may be granted only with the personal approval of the DoD Executive Agent or, when designated by him for that purpose, the Under Secretary of the Army. (2) Requests for Group Two military resources may be granted only with the personal approval of the DoD Executive Agent, or the following individuals when designated by him for that purpose: (i) The Under Secretary of the Army; (ii) The Director and Deputy Director of Military Support; or (iii) A Task Force Commander employed at an objective area during a civil disturbance. (3) Requests for Group Three resources may be granted by Secretaries of the military departments, CINCs of unified and specified commands outside CONUS; or commanders of military installations or organizations who have been delegated such authority by the appropriate Service Secretary or CINC. (i) Installation commanders are authorized to provide emergency explosive ordnance disposal service in accordance with applicable regulations of respective military departments. (ii) The Director, Defense Supply Agency, is authorized to approve requests from subordinate agencies for firefighting assistance in connection with civil disturbances. Where installation fire departments have mutual aid agreements with nearby civil communities, the installation commander is authorized to provide emergency civilian or mixed civilian/military firefighting assistance. In the absence of a mutual aid agreement and when it is in the best interest of the United States, a commander with Group Three approval authority is authorized to provide emergency civilian or mixed civilian/military assistance in extinguishing fires and in preserving life or property from fire, within the vicinity of an installation. In either case, civilian firefighters may be used provided: (a) In civil disturbance situations where there is significant danger of physical harm to firefighters, the civilian employees volunteer for the assignment. (DoD civilian employees acting in this volunteer capacity are acting as Federal employees.) (b) Firefighting equipment will not be used for riot control. (c) Civil authorities recognize that prior to the commitment of Federal forces to assist in restoring law and order, the protection of firefighting crews and equipment is the responsibility, in ascending order, of municipal, county, and State officials. Failure on the part of such authorities to recognize this responsibility and/or to provide adequate protection will be grounds for refusal to commit installation resources or for withdrawal of resources already committed. (4) Requests for Groups One, Two, or Three resources, and for renewal of outstanding loans, may be denied at any level in the chain of command down to and including commanders delegated Group Three approval authority. (c) Processing of requests. (1) All requests will be promptly submitted through channels to the appropriate approving authorities using the format established by the DoD Executive Agent. (2) Requests will be forwarded and processed in keeping with the degree of urgency dictated by the situation. (3) Requests received by personnel of Defense agencies will be referred to local military commanders for processing, except that DSA subordinate agencies will forward requests for firefighting assistance to DSA. (4) Request from civil law enforcement agencies for training assistance related to the control of civil disturbances will not be approved at the local level. Such requests should be referred to the nearest U.S. attorney, Department of Justice. (d) Reporting of requests. (1) Reports of all requests for military resources (approved, denied, or pending) will be prepared by all appropriate approving authorities, using the format established by the DoD Executive Agent, and forwarded through channels as follows: (i) To the military department headquarters, in the case of requests received in the CONUS by the four Services. (ii) To the DoD Executive Agent, in the case of requests for firefighting assistance received by the Defense Supply Agency. (iii) To the JCS, in the case of requests received by organizations or installations over which the commanders of the unified and specified commands exercise command authority. (2) Reports received by the military department headquarters and JCS will be transmitted to the DoD Executive Agent, who, in turn, will transmit information copies of all approved requests for Groups One and Two military resources to the General Counsel of the DoD and the Deputy Attorney General of the United States. (3) In addition, a weekly summary report of all requests will be compiled by the DoD Executive Agent, showing action taken (approved, denied, or pending) and submitted to the General Counsel of the DoD, the Assistant Secretary of Defense (Installations and Logistics), and the Deputy Attorney General of the United States. Negative summary reports are required. (4) The reporting requirements prescribed herein are assigned Report Control Symbol DD-A(AR)1112. 215.10 Funding (a) Reporting requirements to provide for financing costs associated with civil disturbance operations, to include reimbursement of military department expenditures, will be in accordance with DoD Instruction 7200.9, “Financing and Reporting Costs of Military Resources Used in Civil Disturbances,” January 26, 1970, 4 and DoD Executive Agent implementing instructions. 4 Although this resolution has been placed in the Statutes at Large as Pub. L. 90331, 82 Stat. 170, it has not been codified; it is set out in the notes to 18 U.S.C. 3056. (b) Military assistance (Groups One, Two, and Three military resources) provided to civil authorities, under the provisions of 215.9, will be on a reimbursable or reclaimable basis as appropriate. OFFICIAL NOTICE: THE FACTS OF LAW 1. No man in this country is so high that he is above the law. No officer of the law may set that law at defiance, with impunity. All the officers of the Government, from the highest to the lowest, are creatures of the law and are bound to obey it. It is the only supreme power in our system of government, and every man who, by accepting office, participates in its function, is only the more strongly bound to submit to that supremacy, and to observe the limitations which it imposes upon the exercise of the authority which it gives. Courts of justice are established not only to decide upon the controversial rights of the citizens as against each other, but also upon rights in controversy between them and the Government, and the docket of this court is crowded with controversies of the latter class. Shall it be said, in the face of all this, and of the acknowledged right of the judiciary to decide in proper cases, statutes which have been passed by both branches of Congress and approved by the President, to be unconstitutional, that the courts cannot give remedy when the citizen has been deprived of his property by force, his estate seized and converted to the use of the Government without any lawful authority, without any process of law and without any compensation, because the President has ordered it and his officers are in possession? If such be the law of this country, it sanctions a tyranny which has no existence in the monarchies of Europe, or in any other government which has a just claim to well regulated liberty and the protection of personal rights. [106 U.S. at 220] While by the Constitution the judicial department is recognized as one of the three great branches among which all the powers and functions of the Government are distributed, it is inherently the weakest of them all. Dependent as its courts are for the enforcement of their judgments, upon officers appointed by the Executive and removable at his pleasure, with no patronage and no control of purse or sword, their power and influence rest solely upon the public sense of a tribunal to which all may appeal for the assertion and protection of rights guaranteed by the Constitution and by the laws of the land, and on the confidence reposed in the soundness of their decisions and the purity of their motives. [106 U.S. at 223]United States v. Lee (1882), 106 U.S. 196, 27 L.Ed. 171, 182, 1 S.Ct. 240. 2. The first part of the statement made in United States v. Lee was reaffirmed in Butz v. Economou (1978), 438 U.S. 478, 57 L.ED.2d 895, 915, 98 S.Ct. 2894: Our system of jurisprudence rests on the assumption that all individuals, whatever their position in government is subject to federal law: "No man in this country is so high that he is above the law. No officer of the law may set that law at defiance with impunity. All the officers of the Government, from the highest to the lowest, are creatures of the law and are bound to obey it." United States v. Lee, 106 U.S. at 220, 27 L.Ed. 171, 1 S.Ct. 240. 3. The first part of the statement made in Lee was again affirmed in Davis v. Passman (1979), 442 U.S. 228, 60 L.Ed.2d. 846, 863, 99 S.Ct. 2264: As Butz v. Economou stated only last term: "Our system of jurisprudence rests on the assumption that all individuals, whatever their position in government is subject to federal law: “No man in this country is so high that he is above the law. No officer of the law may set that law at defiance with impunity. All the officers of the Government, from the highest to the lowest, are creatures of the law and are bound to obey it.' United States v. Lee, 106 U.S. [196,] 220, [27 L.Ed. 171, 1 S.Ct. 240] [(1882)]." 438 US, at 506, 57 L Ed 2d 895, 98 S CT 2894. 4. According to SHEPARD'S UNITED STATES CITATIONS: UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT REPORTS, LAWYERS' EDITION, 1994, 1996 Supp., 1998 Supp., 2000 Supp., None of the three cases has been reversed, vacated, or overruled. Statements by former President Ronald Reagan Restoration of Judicial Boundaries The Constitution's Article III, Section 1, vests judicial power of the United States in the Supreme Court and "such inferior courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish." Article III, Section 2, of the Constitution specifies the very limited extent of cases subject to judicial power. According to The Federalist Papers, the constitutionally authorized role of the judiciary in dealing with the Constitution and its impact upon the laws passed by Congress was certainly not to ascertain "the spirit of the Constitution," but rather it was to examine the words within the Constitution as "the standard of construction for the laws, and that wherever there is an evident opposition, the laws must give place to the Constitution." This era of judicial activism, to date the most arrogant violation of the Constitution, can be traced to 1936, when in a U.S. Supreme Court decision, Justice Hugo Black penned the words, "We must attempt to ascertain the spirit of the Constitution to interpret it." That flawed statement, in contravention of the restrictions placed on the federal judiciary by the Constitution, upset the delicate system of checks and balances among the three branches of government designed under the Constitution's model of government. Restoration of Congressional Powers Act Congress should adopt legislation restoring to direct congressional jurisdiction and purview all the powers, duties and responsibilities explicitly entrusted to Congress under Article I, Section 8, of the Constitution, whether by this action Congress outright abolishes or merely transfers away from the executive branch any departments, regulatory agencies or federal bureaucracies, or whether by this action Congress rescinds any existing treaties or agreements with international and private agencies or organizations. Congress should further state that none of the agencies under its jurisdiction shall be empowered to promulgate any regulations, orders, statements or advisories that have the force of law, as the Constitution vests legislative powers only with Congress, and these legislative powers may not permissibly be transferred away to any other entity. The Constitution provides that our government possesses a federal structure, in order to serve the objective of self-government through republican representation. As the Declaration of Independence makes clear, governments are instituted in order to secure the rights of individual citizens, and governments derive their just powers solely from the consent of the governed. This nation has currently strayed from this understanding that the only valid purpose of government is as guarantor of individual citizens' rights, substituting in its place various purposes and intentions that, whether designed for good or ill, have abridged and infringed those rights. And because the nation has lost this perspective on the legitimate objectives of government, the federal structure outlined with detail and specificity in the Constitution is no longer honored. This straying from constitutional boundaries is worrisome in and of itself, both because it calls into question the legitimacy of the government and because it inhibits the government from carrying out those legitimate functions authorized by the Constitution. Further, though, a government that has lost focus on its only valid purpose will embark inexorably on a course of systematic violations -- and ultimate destruction -- of its citizens' rights. Coupled with the observation that the twentieth century has seen governments kill tens of millions of their own citizens, this is cause for deep concern. The Declaration of Independence asserts plainly "that these United Colonies are, and of right ought to be, free and independent states." This was the basis of our nation's founding, and this remains the cornerstone that should guide understanding of the respective powers, duties and responsibilities for guaranteeing rights of citizens of the United States, under that "more perfect union" envisioned by the nation's Founders. The Constitution limits the powers of government by division of those powers into separate branches and levels of government. At the national level, the central governing powers are divided into the coequal legislative, executive and judicial branches, so as to offer checks and balances on the unbridled exercise of ruling authority over the states and individual citizens. Moreover, the Constitution is explicit in listing the few and restricted powers that are assigned to the United States, together with the powers that are prohibited to the several states. As the 10th Amendment makes clear, "The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people." This means that only those powers, responsibilities and duties the Constitution explicitly authorizes are legitimate for the national government, and all that is not so authorized is forbidden. We believe that the Constitutional Authorization Report, as described elsewhere in this Platform, would assist in returning the existing overgrowth of government power to the narrow channels of constitutionally limited federalism -- if honestly and faithfully followed by Congress and the state legislatures. However, more is certainly necessary to overturn the violations of federalist principles existing in this 21st century, in such an orderly way as to avoid wrenching dislocations of civic and governmental functions. The major sources of such violations of federalism involving the separation of powers have arisen through executive and judicial usurpations of legislative functions appropriately exercised only by Congress. These usurpations have, in turn, served to centralize power within the national government, violating the federalist principle of preserving states' rights and powers. As additional measures to restore a more perfect union to our country, as envisioned by our nation's Founding Documents, we propose the following. QUOTES TO STUDY: JOHN F. KENNEDY Now the trumpet summons us again, not as a call to bear arms, though arms we need, not as a call to battle, though embattled we are, but as a call to bear the burden of a long twilight struggle - a struggle against the common enemies of man - tyranny, poverty, disease, and war itself." HENRY KISSINGER “Who controls the food supply controls the people.” “Who controls the energy can control whole continents.” “Who controls money can control the world." WASHINGTON "If, in the opinion of the people, the distribution of the constitutional powers be in any particular wrong, let it be corrected in the way which the Constitution designates. "But let there be no change by usurpation, for this, though it may in one instance be the instrument of good, is the ordinary weapon by which free governments are destroyed.." LINCOLN. "It is my duty and my oath to maintain inviolate the right of the States to order and control under the Constitution their own affairs by their own judgment exclusively. Such maintenance is essential for the preservation of that balance of power on which our institutions rest.." LORD ACTION "Liberty is not a means to a higher political end. It is of itself the highest political end." Liberty nourishes self-respect, self-reliance, and every impulse to a higher life. It gives birth to art, literature, and culture. It ever has been the source of all the higher impulses and aspirations of men. On the other hand, a usurping government destroys these qualities, turns the attention of the citizen to foreign politics, dazzles him with military glory, and destroys his aspirations for liberty. Surely the importance to the individual man and to our country of the preservation of liberty justifies a discussion of the present danger from usurpation of power. ALEXANDER HAMILTON, in the debates before the New York Constitutional Convention, he said: "The state governments are essentially necessary to the form and spirit of the general system. As long, therefore, as Congress has a full conviction of this necessity, they must, even upon principles purely national, have as firm an attachment to the one as to the other. This conviction can never leave them, unless they become madmen. While the Constitution continues to be read, and its principles known, the states must, by every rational man, be considered as essential, component parts of the Union; and therefore the idea of sacrificing the former to the latter is wholly inadmissible." The difficulty in our day is found in the fact that when we speak of state rights the minds of men naturally go back to the Civil War and the claims of the South in that contest. We who oppose usurpation by the National Government of the rights of the states plant ourselves upon the same principles as those for which the North waged that war. DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE He has combined with others to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to our constitution, and unacknowledged by our laws; giving his assent to their acts of pretended legislation. Samuel Adams "..it does not require a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority keen to set brush fires in people's minds.." - EQUAL PROTECTION UNDER THE LAW Giozza v. Tiernan, 148 U.S. 657, 662 (1893), Citations Omitted "Undoubtedly it (the Fourteenth Amendment) forbids any arbitrary deprivation of life, liberty or property, and secures equal protection to all under like circumstances in the enjoyment of their rights... It is enough that there is no discrimination in favor of one as against another of the same class. ...And due process of law within the meaning of the [Fifth and Fourteenth] amendment is secured if the laws operate on all alike, and do not subject the individual to an arbitrary exercise of the powers of government." Kentucky Railroad Tax Cases, 115 U.S. 321, 337 (1885) "The rule of equality... requires the same means and methods to be applied impartially to all the constituents of each class, so that the law shall operate equally and uniformly upon all persons in similar circumstances". Truax v. Corrigan, 257 U.S. 312, 332 "Our whole system of law is predicated on the general fundamental principle of equality of application of the law. 'All men are equal before the law,' "This is a government of laws and not of men,' 'No man is above the law,' are all maxims showing the spirit in which legislatures, executives, and courts are expected to make, execute and apply laws. But the framers and adopters of the (Fourteenth) Amendment were not content to depend... upon the spirit of equality which might not be insisted on by local public opinion. They therefore embodied that spirit in a specific guaranty." CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS: Boyd v. United, 116 U.S. 616 at 635 (1885) Justice Bradley, "It may be that it is the obnoxious thing in its mildest form; but illegitimate and unconstitutional practices get their first footing in that way; namely, by silent approaches and slight deviations from legal modes of procedure. This can only be obviated by adhering to the rule that constitutional provisions for the security of persons and property should be liberally construed. A close and literal construction deprives them of half their efficacy, and leads to gradual depreciation of the right, as if it consisted more in sound than in substance. It is the duty of the Courts to be watchful for the Constitutional Rights of the Citizens, and against any stealthy encroachments thereon. Their motto should be Obsta Principiis. Downs v. Bidwell, 182 U.S. 244 (1901) "It will be an evil day for American Liberty if the theory of a government outside supreme law finds lodgment in our constitutional jurisprudence. No higher duty rests upon this Court than to exert its full authority to prevent all violations of the principles of the Constitution." Gomillion v. Lightfoot, 364 U.S. 155 (1966), cited also in Smith v. Allwright, 321 U.S. 649.644 "Constitutional 'rights' would be of little value if they could be indirectly denied." Juliard v. Greeman, 110 U.S. 421 (1884) Supreme Court Justice Field, "There is no such thing as a power of inherent sovereignty in the government of the United States... In this country, sovereignty resides in the people, and Congress can exercise power which they have not, by their Constitution, entrusted to it. All else is withheld." Mallowy v. Hogan, 378 U.S. 1 "All rights and safeguards contained in the first eight amendments to the federal Constitution are equally applicable." Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 426, 491; 86 S. Ct. 1603 "Where rights secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be no 'rule making' or legislation which would abrogate them." Norton v. Shelby County, 118 U.S. 425 p. 442 "An unconstitutional act is not law; it confers no rights; it imposes no duties; affords no protection; it creates no office; it is in legal contemplation, as inoperative as though it had never been passed." Perez v. Brownell, 356 U.S. 44, 7; 8 S. Ct. 568, 2 L. Ed. 2d 603 (1958) "...in our country the people are sovereign and the government cannot sever its relationship to them by taking away their citizenship." Sherar v. Cullen, 481 F. 2d 946 (1973) "There can be no sanction or penalty imposed upon one because of his exercise of constitutional rights." Simmons v. United States, 390 U.S. 377 (1968) "The claim and exercise of a Constitution right cannot be converted into a crime"... "a denial of them would be a denial of due process of law". Elmore v. McCammon (1986) 640 F. Supp. 905 "... the right to file a lawsuit pro se is one of the most important rights under the constitution and laws." Robb v. Connolly, 111 U. S. 624, 637, 28 L. ed. 542, 4 S. Ct. 544. Upon the state courts, equally with the courts of the United States, rests the obligation to guard and enforce every right secured by that Constitution [of the United States]. Warnock v. Pecos County, Texas., 88 F3d 341 (5th Cir. 1996) Eleventh Amendment does not protect state officials from claims for prospective relief when it is alleged that state officials acted in violation of federal law. Sherar v. Cullen, 481 F. 2d 946 (1973) "There can be no sanction or penalty imposed upon one because of his exercise of Constitutional Rights." Schware v. Board of Examiners, United State Reports 353 U.S. pages 238, 239. "The practice of law cannot be licensed by any state/State." Sims v. Aherns, 271 SW 720 (1925) "THE PRACTICE OF LAW IS AN OCCUPATION OF COMMON RIGHT." Cooper v. Aaron (1958), 358 U.S. 1, 18, 3 L.Ed.2d 5, 17, 78 S.Ct. 1401. Every state legislator and executive and judicial officer is solemnly committed by oath taken pursuant to Art 6, cl 3, "to support this Constitution." Chief Justice Taney, speaking for a unanimous Court in 1859, said that this requirement reflected the framers' "anxiety to preserve it [the Constitution] in full force, in all its powers, and to guard against resistance to or evasion of its authority, on the part of a State. . . ." Ableman v Booth (US) 21 How 506, 524, 16 L ed 169, 176. No state legislator or executive or judicial officer can war against the Constitution without violating his undertaking to support it. Ex parte Virginia, 100 US 339, 346-347, 25 L Ed 676 (1880). The Constitution constrains governmental action "by whatever instruments or in whatever modes that action may be taken." Ex parte Virginia, 100 US 339, 346-347, 25 L Ed 676 (1880). And under whatever congressional label. ... Even Congress itself appeared to acknowledge, at least until recent years, that Government-created and -controlled corporations were part of the Government. The Government Corporation Control Act of 1945, discussed above, which brought to an end an era of uncontrolled growth of Government corporations, provided that, without explicit congressional authorization, no corporation should be acquired or created by "any officer or agency of the Federal Government or by any Governmental corporation for the purpose of acting as an agency or instrumentality of the United States ...." sec 304(a), 59 Stat, at 602 (emphasis added). That was evidently intended to restrict the creation of all Government-controlled policy-implementing corporations, and not just some of them. And the companion provision that swept away many of the extant corporations said that no wholly owned government corporation created under state law could continue "as an agency or instrumentality of the United States," sec. 304(b), 59 Stat, at 602. ... It surely cannot be that government, state or federal, is able to evade the most solemn obligations imposed in the Constitution by simply resorting to the corporate form.(emphasis added) Lebron v. National R. Passenger Corp. (1995), 513 U.S. 574, 130 L.Ed.2d 902, 914-923, 115 S.Ct. 961. The 16th American Jurisprudence, Second Edition, Section 177: “The general misconception is that any statute passed by legislators bearing the appearance of law constitutes the law of the land. The U.S. Constitution is the supreme law of the land, and any statute, to be valid, must be in agreement. It is impossible for both the Constitution and a law violating it to be valid; one must prevail. This is succinctly stated as follows: “The general rule is that an unconstitutional statute, though having the form and name of law, is in reality no law, but is wholly void, and ineffective for any purpose; since unconstitutionality dates from the time of its enactment, and not merely from the date of the decision so branding it. As unconstitutional law, in legal contemplation, is as inoperative as if it had never been passed. Such a statute leaves the question that it purports to settle just as it would be had the statute not been enacted.” “Since an unconstitutional law is void, the general principles follow that it imposes no duties, confers no right, creates no office, bestows no power or authority on anyone, affords no protection, and justifies no acts performed under it” “A void act cannot be legally consistent with a valid one. An unconstitutional law cannot operate to supersede any existing valid law. Indeed, in so far as a statute runs counter to the fundamental law of the land, it is superseded thereby. No one is bound to obey an unconstitutional law and no courts are bound to enforce it.” Any court, government or government officer who acts in violation of, in opposition or contradiction to the foregoing, by his own actions, commits treason and invokes the self-executing Sections 3 and 4 of the 14th Amendment and vacates his office. It is the duty of every American Citizen to oppose all enemies of this Nation, foreign and DOMESTIC. CORRUPTION OF AUTHORITY: (People v. Tenerowicz, 266 Mich. 276 [253 N.W. 296].) Lorenson v. Superior Court (1950), 35 Cal.2d 49, 59-60, 216 P.2d 859. A conspiracy with or among public officials not to perform their official duty to enforce criminal laws is an obstruction of justice and an indictable offense at common law.Ex Parte Young, 209 US 123. "No change in ancient procedure can be made which disrupts those fundamental principles . . . which . . . protect the citizen in his private right and guard him against the arbitrary action of the government." Butz v. Economou, 98 S. Ct. 2894 (1978); United States v. Lee, 106 U.S. at 220, 1 S. Ct. at 261 (1882) "No man [or woman] in this country is so high that he is above the law. No officer of the law may set that law at defiance with impunity. All the officers of the government from the highest to the lowest, are creatures of the law, and are bound to obey it." *Cannon v. Commission on Judicial Qualifications, (1975) 14 Cal. 3d 678, 694 Acts in excess of judicial authority constitutes misconduct, particularly where a judge deliberately disregards the requirements of fairness and due process. *Geiler v. Commission on Judicial Qualifications, (1973) 10 Cal.3d 270, 286 Society's commitment to institutional justice requires that judges be solicitous of the rights of persons who come before the court. * Gonzalez v. Commission on Judicial Performance, (1983) 33 Cal. 3d 359, 371, 374 Acts in excess of judicial authority constitutes misconduct, particularly where a judge deliberately disregards the requirements of fairness and due process. Olmstad v. United States, (1928) 277 U.S. 438 "Crime is contagious. If the Government becomes a lawbreaker, it breeds contempt for law; it invites every man to become a law unto himself; it invites anarchy." Owen v. City of Independence . "The innocent individual who is harmed by an abuse of governmental authority is assured that he will be compensated for his injury." Perry v. United States, 204 U.S. 330, 358 "I do not understand the government to contend that it is any less bound by the obligation than a private individual would be..." "It is not the function of our government to keep the citizen from falling into error; it is the function of the citizen to keep the government from falling into error." *Ryan v. Commission on Judicial Performance, (1988) 45 Cal. 3d 518, 533 Before sending a person to jail for contempt or imposing a fine, judges are required to provide due process of law, including strict adherence to the procedural requirements contained in the Code of Civil Procedure. Ignorance of these procedures is not a mitigating but an aggravating factor. U.S. v. Lee, 106 U.S. 196, 220 1 S. Ct. 240, 261, 27 L. Ed 171 (1882) "No man in this country is so high that he is above the law. No officer of the law may set that law at defiance, with impunity. All the officers of the government, from the highest to the lowest, are creatures of the law are bound to obey it." "It is the only supreme power in our system of government, and every man who, by accepting office participates in its functions, is only the more strongly bound to submit to that supremacy, and to observe the limitations which it imposes on the exercise of the authority which it gives." Warnock v. Pecos County, Texas, 88 F3d 341 (5th Cir. 1996) Eleventh Amendment does not protect state officials from claims for prospective relief when it is alleged that state officials acted in violation of federal law. Glazier v Hubbard, 42 SW 1114, (1887) A judge is not such at all times, and for all purposes, when he acts he must be clothed with jurisdiction and acting without this, he is but an individual assuming an authority he does not possess. Blincoe v Head, 44 SW 374, (1898); Reed v Taylor, 78 SW 892, (1904) judges . . . who step outside of the circle of duty thus drawn by the letter of the statute, they must answer in damages to such individuals as may suffer from such unauthorized acts. McDoanald v Goodman et al, 239 SW2d 97, (1951) e is. A conspiracy is a corrupt or unlawful combination or assuming an authority he does not possess. G Conspiracy is a corrupt or unlawful combination or agreement between two or more persons to do by concerted action . . . a lawful act by unlawful means. . .) US v Townsend, 924 F2d 1385, (7th Cir 1991) . . . single or multiple conspiracy is a question of fact; joining the agreement, not the group is the requirement of conspiracy; names of other conspirators are not required to convict one conspirator; agreement to conspire is one offense; substantive offense is separate and independent . . . . Tortuous act; US v Pan Am Petroleum, 55 F2d 753 at 778, (9th Cir 1932)4, (18); Fraud and conspiracy are not the cause of action, but rather the overt acts done in furtherance of the fraudulent plan. . . . The gist of the action is the damage and not the conspiracy. The charge of conspiracy where unsupported by evidence will be considered mere surplus age, not necessary to be proved to support the action. He may yet recover damages against one or more of the defendants shown to be guilty of the torts JUDICIAL IMMUNITY: Nowhere was the judiciary given immunity, particularly nowhere in Article III; under our Constitution, if judges were to have immunity, it could only possibly be granted by amendment (and even less possibly by legislative act), as Art. I, Sections 9 & 10, respectively, in fact expressly prohibit such, stating, "No Title of Nobility shall be granted by the United States" and "No state shall... grant any Title of Nobility Article III, Sec. 1, "The Judicial Power of the United States shall be vested in one Supreme Court, and in such inferior courts, shall hold their offices during good behavior." Tort & Insurance Law Journal, spring 1986 21 n3, p 509-516, "Federal tort law: judges cannot invoke judicial immunity for acts that violate litigants' civil rights." - Robert Craig Waters. Ableman v. Booth, 21 Howard 506 (1859) "No judicial process, whatever form it may assume, can have any lawful authority outside of the limits of the jurisdiction of the court or judge by whom it is issued; and an attempt to enforce it beyond these boundaries is nothing less than lawless violence." Chandler v. Judicial Council of the 10th Circuit, 398 U.S. 74, 90 S. Ct. 1648, 26 L. Ed. 2d 100 Justice Douglas, in his dissenting opinion at page 140 said, "If (federal judges) break the law, they can be prosecuted." Justice Black, in his dissenting opinion at page 141) said, "Judges, like other people, can be tried, convicted and punished for crimes... The judicial power shall extend to all cases, in law and equity, arising under this Constitution". Cooper v. Aaron, 358 U.S. 1, 78 S. Ct. 1401 (1958) Any judge who does not comply with his oath to the Constitution of the United States wars against that Constitution and engages in acts in violation of the supreme law of the land. The judge is engaged in acts of treason. The U.S. Supreme Court has stated that "no state legislator or executive or judicial officer can war against the Constitution without violating his undertaking to support it". See also In Re Sawyer, 124 U.S. 200 (188); U.S. v. Will, 449 U.S. 200, 216, 101 S. Ct. 471, 66 L. Ed. 2d 392, 406 (1980); Cohen’s v. Virginia, 19 U.S. (6 Wheat) 264, 404, 5 L. Ed 257 (1821). Cooper v. O'Conner, 99 F.2d 133 There is a general rule that a ministerial officer, who acts wrongfully, although in good faith, is nevertheless liable in a civil action and cannot claim the immunity of the sovereign. Davis v. Burris, 51 Ariz. 220, 75 P.2d 689 (1938) A judge must be acting within his jurisdiction as to subject matter and person, to be entitled to immunity from civil action for his acts. Forrester v. White, 484 U.S. at 227-229, 108 S. Ct. at 544-545 (1987); Westfall v.Erwin, 108 S. Ct. 580 (1987); United States v. Lanier (March 1997) Constitutionally and in fact of law and judicial rulings, state-federal "magistrates-judges" or any government actors, state or federal, may now be held liable, if they violate any Citizen's Constitutional rights, privileges, or immunities, or guarantees; including statutory civil rights. A judge is not immune for tortious acts committed in a purely administrative, non-judicial capacity. Gregory v. Thompson, F.2d 59 (C.A. Ariz. 1974) Generally, judges are immune from suit for judicial acts within or in excess of their jurisdiction even if those acts have been done maliciously or corruptly; the only exception being for acts done in the clear absence of all jurisdictions. Hoffsomer v. Hayes, 92 Okla 32, 227 F. 417 "The courts are not bound by an officer's interpretation of the law under which he presumes to act." Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. (2 Cranch) 137, 180 (1803) "... the particular phraseology of the Constitution of the United States confirms and strengthens the principle, supposed to be essential to all written Constitutions, that a law repugnant to the constitution is void, and that courts, as well as other departments, are bound by that instrument." "In declaring what shall be the supreme law of the land, the Constitution itself is first mentioned; and not the laws of the United States generally, but those only which shall be made in pursuance of the Constitution, have that rank". "All law (rules and practices) which are repugnant to the Constitution are VOID". Since the 14th Amendment to the Constitution states "NO State (Jurisdiction) shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the rights, privileges, or immunities of citizens of the United States nor deprive any citizens of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law, ... or equal protection under the law", this renders judicial immunity unconstitutional. Piper v. Pearson, 2 Gray 120, cited in Bradley v. Fisher, 13 Wall. 335, 20 L.Ed. 646 (1872) "Where there is no jurisdiction, there can be no discretion, for discretion is incident to jurisdiction." Pulliam v. Allen, 466 U.S. 522 (1984); 104 S. Ct. 1781, 1980, 1981, and 1982 In 1996, Congress passed a law to overcome this ruling which stated that judicial immunity doesn't exist; citizens can sue judges for prospective injunctive relief. "Our own experience is fully consistent with the common law's rejection of a rule of judicial immunity. We never have had a rule of absolute judicial immunity. At least seven circuits have indicated affirmatively that there is no immunity... to prevent irreparable injury to a citizen's constitutional rights..." "Subsequent interpretations of the Civil Rights Act by this Court acknowledge Congress' intent to reach unconstitutional actions by all state and federal actors, including judges... The Fourteenth Amendment prohibits a state [federal] from denying any person [citizen] within its jurisdiction the equal protection under the laws. Since a State [or federal] acts only by its legislative, executive or judicial authorities, the constitutional provisions must be addressed to those authorities, including state and federal judges..." "We conclude that judicial immunity is not a bar to relief against a judicial officer acting in her [his] judicial capacity." Scheuer v. Rhodes, 416 U.S. 232, 94 S. Ct. 1683, 1687 (1974) By law, a judge is a state officer. The judge then acts not as a judge, but as a private individual (in his person). When a judge acts as a trespasser of the law, when a judge does not follow the law, the Judge loses subject-matter jurisdiction and the judges' orders are not voidable, but VOID, and of no legal force or effect. The U.S. Supreme Court stated that "when a state officer acts under a state law in a manner volatile of the Federal Constitution, he comes into conflict with the superior authority of that Constitution, and he is in that case stripped of his official or representative character and is subjected in his person to the consequences of his individual conduct. The State has no power to impart to him any immunity from responsibility to the supreme authority of the United States." Stump v. Sparkman, id., 435 U.S. 349 Some Defendants urge that any act "of a judicial nature" entitles the Judge to absolute judicial immunity. But in a jurisdictional vacuum (that is, absence of all jurisdiction) the second prong necessary to absolute judicial immunity is missing. A judge is not immune for tortious acts committed in a purely Administrative, non-judicial capacity. Rankin v. Howard, 633 F.2d 844 (1980) The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals reversed an Arizona District Court dismissal based upon absolute judicial immunity, finding that both necessary immunity prongs were absent; later, in Ashelman v. Pope, 793 F.2d 1072 (1986), the Ninth Circuit, en banc, criticized the "judicial nature" analysis it had published in Rankin as unnecessarily restrictive. But Rankin's ultimate result was not changed, because Judge Howard had been independently divested of absolute judicial immunity by his complete lack of jurisdiction. U.S. Fidelity & Guaranty Co. (State use of), 217 Miss. 576, 64 So. 2d 697 When a judicial officer acts entirely without jurisdiction or without compliance with jurisdiction requisites he may be held civilly liable for abuse of process even though his act involved a decision made in good faith, that he had jurisdiction. U.S. v. Lee, 106 U.S. 196, 220 1 S. Ct. 240, 261, 27 L. Ed 171 (1882) "No man in this country is so high that he is above the law. No officer of the law may set that law at defiance with impunity. All the officers of the government, from the highest to the lowest, are creatures of the law and are bound to obey it." "It is the only supreme power in our system of government, and every man who, by accepting office participates in its functions, is only the more strongly bound to submit to that supremacy, and to observe the limitations which it imposes on the exercise of the authority which it gives." Zeller v. Rankin, 101 S.Ct. 2020, 451 U.S. 939, 68 L.Ed 2d 326 When a judge knows that he lacks jurisdiction, or acts in the face of clearly valid statutes expressly depriving him of jurisdiction, judicial immunity is lost. JONATHAN LIPPMAN’S ADMINISTRATION MANUAL Legal Fraud Blacks Law Dictionary 4th Edition (Page 1040) Contracts or acts as, though not originating in actual evil design to perpetrate fraud, yet by their tendency to mislead others or to violate confidence, are prohibited by law. Blacks Law Dictionary 4th Edition False Representation - A representation which is untrue, willfully made to deceive another to his injury Blacks Law Dictionary 4th Edition Falsification - - In equity practice. The showing an item in the debit of an account to be either wholly false or in some part erroneous. Blacks Law Dictionary 4th Edition False Pretenses - Designed misrepresentation of existing fact or condition whereby person obtains another's money or goods. People v. Gould, 363 ill. 348, 2 N.E.2d 324. Blacks Law Dictionary 4th Edition False or Fraudulent Claim - A "false or fraudulent claim" within meaning of statute providing for punishment of any one receiving proceeds of fraudulent audit or payment, since to be "false or fraudulent," must be a claim for services or materials not actually rendered or furnished. People v. Dally, 175 Misc. 680, 24 N.Y.S.2d 692, 695. Blacks Law Dictionary 4th Edition Negligence - The omission to do something which a reasonable man, guided by those ordinary considerations which ordinarily regulate human affairs, would do, or the doing of something which a reasonable and prudent man would not do. Blacks Law Dictionary 4th Edition Deceit - - A fraudulent and cheating misrepresentation, artifice, or device, used by one or more persons to deceive and trick another, who is ignorant of the true facts, to the prejudice and damage of the party imposed upon. People v. Chadwick, 143 Cal. 116, 76 P. 884. Webster Hoax: A deception for mockery or mischief; To deceive by a hoax. Syn. see dupe. Dupe: One who has been or is easily deceived. To delude; deceive; gull. - dupe, gull, trick, hoax mean to delude one by underhanded means. Dupe suggests unwariness in the person deluded and the acceptance of what is false as true, of counterfeit as genuine, or the like; WEBSTER. Fraud- The unlawful obtaining of another's property by design, but without criminal intent, and with the assent of the owner obtained by artifice or misrepresentation. Any cunning deception or artifice used to circumvent, cheat, or deceive another. Story, Eq. Jur. 9 186. Blacks Law Dictionary 4th Edition Defamation -- The taking from one's reputation. The offense for injuring a person's character, fame, or reputation by false and malicious statements. The term seems to include both libel and slander. Blacks Law Dictionary 4th Edition Malicious - Characterized by, or involving, malice; having, or done with, wicked or mischievous intentions or motives; wrongful and done intentionally without just cause or excuse. People v. Knapp, 274 N.Y.S. 85, 152 Misc. 368. DOCUMENTED JONATHAN LIPPMAN LAWLESS USURPATIONS, LEGAL FICTION DUPING, PUBLIC DEFRAUD, INSURRECTION AGAINST THE CONSTITUTION, AND SEDITIOUS CRIMINAL ADMINISTRATION New York Court of Appeals •main page •about •searc 1 No. 1 Leonard J. Levenson, et al., Respondents, v. Jonathan Lippman, &c., et al., Appellants. _________________________________________________________________ 2005 NY Int. 9 February 15, 2005 This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the New York Reports. Michael Colodner, for appellants. Peter J. Macdonald, for respondents. City of New York; New York County Lawyers' Association; Association of Justices of the Supreme Court of the State of New York et al.; New York State Defenders Association, et al., amici curiæ. __________________________________________________________________ PER CURIAM: The issue presented in this appeal is whether the Chief Administrative Judge acted within the authority granted him by the New York State Constitution when he amended section 127.2 (b) of the Rules of the Chief Administrator of the Courts (22 NYCRR 127.2[b]). As amended, the rule permits an administrative judge to review an order of a trial judge setting an award of compensation in excess of the statutory limits set forth in section 722-b of the New York County Law. We conclude that the Chief Administrative Judge acted within his authority and declare that Rule 127.2 (b) is valid. Article 18-B of the County Law requires all counties to maintain a plan to provide counsel to individuals charged with a crime or who are otherwise statutorily entitled to representation (County Law 722). One manner in which a county may furnish representation is through a bar association plan in which the services of private counsel are rotated and coordinated by an administrator (the Assigned Counsel Plan)(County Law 722 [3]). Section 722-b of the County Law governs the compensation rates for attorneys who participate in the Assigned Counsel Plan. During the period relevant to this case, County Law 722-b provided that attorneys participating in the Assigned Counsel Plan be compensated at a rate not to exceed $25 per hour for work performed outside of court and $40 per hour for work performed in court, plus reasonable expenses. The provision further imposed a cap of $800 for misdemeanor cases and $1,200 for felony cases and all appellate matters.[1] However, upon application to the court, compensation in excess of these statutory limits could be paid upon a showing of "extraordinary circumstances." These assigned counsel rates, in effect since 1986, have worked a hardship upon the assigned counsel system as the number of attorneys willing to participate in the program severely decreased because the fees were inadequate. At the same time, the number of individuals in need of assigned representation increased, causing many trial courts to struggle to find attorneys willing to represent indigent defendants in criminal proceedings. There arose a growing concern that the lack of attorneys available to represent indigent criminal defendants threatened to deny such individuals their federal and state constitutional rights. To alleviate the problem, a number of trial judges authorized enhanced compensation awards for assigned counsel. These judges concluded that the loss of attorneys from the assigned counsel panels due to the existing rate structure constituted an extraordinary circumstance justifying an enhanced hourly rate to ensure the availability of qualified attorneys to provide constitutionally required representation. This practice prompted protests from localities responsible for paying these enhanced awards. There was, however no mechanism to review these enhanced awards, either judicially or administratively. In 2001, after consulting with the Administrative Board of the Courts, the Chief Administrative Judge amended Rule 127.2 to vest the power to review these awards with the appropriate administrative judge. Specifically, the Chief Administrative Judge amended Rule 127.2 (b) to give administrative judges the power to review enhanced awards, with or without application, and to modify an award “if it is found that the award reflects an abuse of discretion by the trial judge."[2] Plaintiffs Leonard Levenson, Richard A. Siracusa and James H. Tatem are all criminal defense attorneys who participate in the Assigned Counsel Plan, Felony Panel for the County of New York, representing indigent defendants in criminal proceedings. As relevant here, plaintiffs were appointed to represent indigent defendants in five separate criminal proceedings. In each of the underlying proceedings, plaintiffs submitted applications to the presiding trial judge requesting compensation in excess of the statutory limit, and in each instance the respective trial judge determined that extraordinary circumstances warranted an upward departure from the statutory rates. One Justice ordered compensation for Levenson at an hourly rate of $75 for work performed in and out of court, for an aggregate compensation of $10,462.50. Upon Levenson's application in a separate trial, another Justice ordered that Levenson be compensated at an hourly rate of $65 for in court work and $25 for out of court work, totaling $4,007.50. Similarly, a Justice ordered that Siracusa be paid an hourly rate of $75, for a total of $4,875. Tatem's application for compensation in one case resulted in a Justice ordering that he be paid at a rate of $75 per hour, for a total of $2,118.75. Pursuant to an application in a separate case, another Justice ordered that Tatem be compensated at a rate of $75 per hour, for an aggregate of $3,488.35. In each case, the Director of the Assigned Counsel Plan submitted a request for review of the enhanced fee awards to Administrative Judge Micki A. Scherer, whom the Chief Administrative Judge appointed pursuant to Rule 127.2 (b) to review such excess compensation awards in the Supreme Court, Criminal Term, First Judicial District. Judge Scherer modified each enhanced award by reducing the compensation to the maximum rates set forth in County Law 722-b. In January 2002, plaintiffs Siracusa and Tatem commenced a declaratory judgment action against defendants Jonathan Lippman, in his official capacity as the Chief Administrative Judge of the Courts, Judge Scherer and the New York State Office of Court Administration challenging the constitutionality of Rule 127.2 (b). In May 2002, plaintiff Levenson brought a similar action, which was subsequently consolidated with the Siracusa/Tatem action pursuant to a stipulation. Plaintiffs, in their respective complaints, asserted that Rule 127.2 (b) “unconstitutionally permitted the establishment of an appellate court by delegating the power to review a trial court's order to” an administrative judge. Ruling on plaintiffs' declaratory judgment action, Supreme Court declared that (1) in amending Rule 127.2 (b), the Chief Administrative Judge did not exceed the authority granted to him by the New York Constitution and the New York Legislature; (2) Rule 127.2 (b) is neither invalid nor unconstitutional; and (3) Judge Scherer's orders modifying the awards of compensation granted by the trial judges are valid. Rejecting plaintiffs' argument that the trial court's exercise of discretion in the award of enhanced compensation fees was not subject to review, the court, relying on Matter of Werfel v Agresta (, 36 NY2d 624 [1975]) and Matter of Director of Assigned Counsel Plan of the City of New York (Bodek) (87 2 191 [1995]), stated that "compensation awarded to assigned counsel is not reviewable by the appellate courts, but can only be reviewed on an administrative level.” The court also concluded that Rule 127.2 (b) was validly amended pursuant to the power conferred upon the Chief Administrative Judge by article VI, 28(b) of the Constitution to “adopt administrative rules for the efficient and orderly transaction of business in the trial courts,” as delegated by the Chief Judge in 22 NYCRR 80.1. The Appellate Division reversed Supreme Court's judgment, vacated Judge Scherer's orders modifying the trial courts' excess compensation awards, reinstated the original excess compensation awards and declared Rule 127.2 (b) null and void. The court concluded that the authority of the administrative judge to review the trial judge's award of enhanced compensation provided in Rule 127.2 (b) was inconsistent with New York Constitution article VI, 30, which grants individual courts the power to adopt such rules and regulations as are "consistent with the general practice and procedure as provided by statute or general rules." In particular, the court stated that Rule 127.2 (b) violated article VI, 30 because it usurped the Appellate Division's authority, pursuant to CPLR 5501 (c) and 5701, to review the merits of an order of the Supreme Court. Thus, the court held that Rule 127.2 (b), as amended, effectuated an unconstitutional transfer of appellate jurisdiction from the Appellate Division to administrative judges, who “lack[] any constitutional or statutory appellate authority and who [are] further constrained by the well-settled proscription against issuing a ruling in contravention of a court of coordinate jurisdiction.” Defendants appealed to this Court as a matter of right on constitutional grounds, pursuant to CPLR 5601(b) , and we now reverse the order of the Appellate Division and reinstate the judgment of Supreme Court. In Matter of Werfel v Agresta (, 36 NY2d 624 [1975]), the petitioner was a participant in the Assigned Counsel Plan and was awarded compensation that fell within the statutory limits. The petitioner brought a CPLR article 78 proceeding seeking an increase in compensation. Concluding that the assignment of compensation to assigned counsel pursuant to County Law 722-b was administrative in nature and did not concern the performance of an adjudicative function, we held that "there was no basis for justiciable review of allowances to counsel made within the maximums provided by the statute" ( id. at 626-27). We did, however, leave open the possibility that an assigned attorney entitled to an adjustment in compensation could apply for it through the appropriate administrative judge or even to the Administrative Board of the court system (see id. at 627). In Matter of Director of Assigned Counsel Plan of the City of New York (Bodek) (87 2 191 [1995]) we reaffirmed our determination that a trial judge's award of compensation pursuant to County Law 722-b was an administrative act not subject to judicial review. There, two trial judges awarded excess compensation to a court-appointed social worker pursuant to County Law 722-c. After the same trial judges denied the requests from the Director of the Assigned Counsel Plan to reduce the compensation awards, the Director attempted to appeal the awards. The Appellate Division declined to consider the merits of the appeals, holding that they were not reviewable. This Court affirmed. Initially, we noted that, as to appealability, there was no meaningful distinction between the County Law 722 and 722-b assigned-counsel compensation orders to be appealed in Werfel and the County Law 722-c assigned-expert compensation orders in Bodek. We went on to hold that "such orders are essentially administrative in nature and, accordingly, are not amenable to judicial review on the merits by an appellate panel." Finally, this Court stated, "[t]o the extent that the trial courts' unreviewable discretion produces truly anomalous consequences or patterns of abuse in particular situations, the problem can and should be addressed through the available administrative tools." We reaffirm our holdings in Werfel and Bodek today. In doing so, we disagree with the Appellate Division's conclusion that, by promulgating Rule 127.2 (b), the Chief Administrative Judge unconstitutionally divested the Appellate Division of its jurisdiction to review compensation orders issued by the Supreme Court by assigning that power to administrative judges. Indeed, the Appellate Division's holding is the very opposite of its holding in Bodek, which we affirmed. Because, under Bodek and Werfel, the appellate courts have no power to review a trial courts' excess compensation award, and this Court's decisions contemplated administrative review of such awards, Rule 127.2 (b) does not confer upon an administrative judge any authority that would otherwise belong to the appellate courts. We further conclude that the Chief Administrative Judge properly adopted Rule 127.2 (b) pursuant to his regulatory power under the state constitution and the Judiciary Law. New York Constitution article VI, 28(b) states: "The chief administrator, on behalf of the chief judge, shall supervise the administration and operation of the unified court system. In the exercise of such responsibility, the chief administrator of the courts shall have such powers and duties as may be delegated to him or her by the chief judge and such additional powers and duties as may be provided by law." Moreover, Judiciary Law 212 states that it is the role of the Chief Administrator of the courts to "supervise the administration and operation of the unified court system" on behalf of the Chief Judge. In the exercise of that responsibility, 212 provides that the Chief Administrator "shall have the powers and duties as may be delegated to him by" the Chief Judge. The powers and duties of the Chief Administrative Judge, as delegated by the Chief Judge, are set forth in 22 NYCRR 80.1, which in pertinent part provides: "In the exercise of this delegated responsibility and in accordance with the standards and administrative policies established, approved and promulgated pursuant to article VI, section 28(c) of the Constitution, the Chief Administrator shall: * * * “(6) adopt administrative rules for the efficient and orderly transaction of business in the trial courts, including but not limited to calendar practice, in consultation with the Administrative Board of the Courts or the appropriate Appellate Divisions." Defendants maintain, and we agree, that with the advice and consent of the Administrative Board, the Chief Administrator properly promulgated Rule 127.2 (b) pursuant to his delegated authority to adopt rules for the efficient and orderly transaction of trial court business. The allocation of finite financial resources for the payment of assigned counsel is a concern for court administrators, and the Chief Administrator validly adopted Rule 127.2 (b) pursuant to the authority delegated to him under 22 NYCRR 80.1. Finally, we find unpersuasive plaintiffs' argument that Rule 127.2 (b) violates New York Constitution article VI, 30 by intruding upon the Legislature's authority to regulate proceedings in law.[3] More particularly, plaintiffs maintain that the regulation conflicts with the Legislature's intent, as expressed in County Law 722-b, to vest trial courts with exclusive authority to fix assigned counsel fees. We disagree. By making no provision in the County Law for any review of excessive compensation awards, the Legislature simply created a gap in the administrative process that the Chief Administrator was entitled to fill. Otherwise, these awards would be wholly unreviewable. While plaintiffs seek this result, we cannot agree with it. Additionally, given that the award of compensation fees is an administrative rather than a judicial act of the trial judge, the Legislature could not by statute divest the Chief Administrator of his authority under New York Constitution article VI, 28 to supervise the administration and operation of the Unified Court System on behalf of the Chief Judge ( see Met Council, Inc. v Crosson, , 84 NY2d 328, 335 [1994][where the powers of the Chief Administrator flow from the State Constitution, they cannot be abrogated by statute]). Accordingly, the order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, with costs, and the judgment of Supreme Court, reinstated. Levenson, et al. v Lippman, et al. No. 1 ROSENBLATT, J. (concurring): Although I join the Court's opinion without reservation, I write separately to acknowledge the Appellate Division's concern -- so ardently expressed in the case before us -- that section 127.2 (b) would divest that court of the power to review orders of the kind involved here. Although I agree that the Chief Administrative Judge had the authority to promulgate section 127.2 (b), I note that he did so only after the Legislature did not enact 1995 NY Senate Bill S 4481. Under that bill, which was introduced at the request of the Office of Court Administration on the recommendation of the Administrative Board of the Courts, the Appellate Division would have been given authority to conduct expedited reviews of enhanced payment vouchers.[4] That would have satisfied the issues raised by the Appellate Division, while filling "a void in the . . . statutory framework" (Senate Introducer Mem in Support, 1995 NY Senate Bill S 4481), which otherwise lacked any provision for review of enhanced payment vouchers. As amici, the Association of Justices of the Supreme Court of the State of New York and Association of Supreme Court Justices for the City of New York oppose section 127.2 (b), in part because it allows administrative judges to overrule the orders of other judges of "co-ordinate jurisdiction." S 4481 would have also obviated that objection. A decade ago, keenly sensitive to the viewpoint of the trial and appellate Justices, the court administration sought passage of S 4481, which would have authorized review by the Appellate Division, instead of review by administrative judges. Because the Senate Bill was never enacted, the Chief Administrative Judge exercised his powers to provide for administrative review, the only review he could institute without legislation. Given this background, the Legislature may wish to consider vesting the Appellate Division with the authority to review vouchers of this type, as contemplated by S 4481. In that fashion, the best of both worlds would be realized: filling a void in oversight and giving that oversight to an appellate tribunal. Order reversed, with costs, and judgment of Supreme Court, New York County, reinstated. Opinion Per Curiam. Judges Smith, Ciparick, Rosenblatt, Graffeo, Read and Smith concur, Judge Rosenblatt in a separate concurring opinion. Chief Judge Kaye took no part. Decided February 15, 2005 ________________________________________ Footnotes 1 County Law 722-b has since been amended. Effective January 1, 2004, compensation rates for assigned counsel were increased to $75 per hour (for work performed in and out of court) for felony cases and appeals, with a maximum compensation limit of $4,400. For misdemeanor cases, the compensation rates were increased to $60 per hour, with a maximum limit of $2,400. 2 Prior to the amendment, Rule 127.2 (b) provided that, upon proper application to review an award of enhanced attorney's fees, the trial judge could reconsider the award in consultation with the appropriate administrative judge. The final determination of the fees, however, remained with the trial judge. 3 New York Constitution, article VI, section 30 states: "The legislature shall have the same power to alter and regulate the jurisdiction and proceedings in law and in equity that it has heretofore exercised. The legislature may, on such terms as it shall provide and subject to subsequent modification, delegate, in whole or in part, to a court, including the appellate division of the supreme court, or to the chief administrator of the courts, any power possessed by the legislature to regulate practice and procedure in the courts. The chief administrator of the courts shall exercise any such power delegated to him or her with the advice and consent of the administrative board of the courts. Nothing herein contained shall prevent the adoption of regulations by individual courts consistent with the general practice and procedure as provided by statute or general rules." 4 In pertinent part, the proposed legislation read, "Any order of a trial court determining a claim for compensation or reimbursement hereunder shall be subject to review in the court having appellate jurisdiction of the action in which the claim was made upon application of the claimant or the political subdivision upon which payment of the claim is a charge. The appellate court shall provide for the expedited determination of such application and may confirm, increase, or decrease the compensation or reimbursement awarded." LIPPMANS HOME WITH DEADLY PATHOGENS WHILE ADMINISTERING INJUSTICE IN AND OUT OF THE NYS COURTS. UNAIDS.ORG. HIS COLORABLE KILLING OPERATION THAT GIVES HIM FREE REIGN TO KILL UNDER THE COLOR/DISGUISE OF LAW. Search Click here: Search Document- search results for free text: JONATHAN LIPPMAN, NYS UNIFIED COURT CHIEF INJUSTICE Documents 1 to 20 of the best 25 matching the query. Page 1 to 2, or view page: 1 | 2 Sort by: Rank | Date Show descriptions 1. Operational guidelines for supporting early child development (ECD) in multi-sectoral HIV/AIDS programs in Africa Report - 22/9/2003 - English - Check for other languages UNAIDS, UNICEF, World Bank This document, produced by UNAIDS, the World Bank and UNICEF, provides guidance for incorporating activities directed at infants and young children into HIV/AIDS programs in Africa. Effective, broad-scale interventions to assure the healthy physical, emotional, and cognitive development of young children are desperately needed in Sub-Saharan Africa and must be an essential component of any well-designed, integrated program to prevent and reduce the impact of HIV/AIDS in Africa. These guidelines are meant to be a "work in progress" and will be updated continually based on comments, new data and user experience. 2. AIM Version 4 Manual - 8/4/2003 - English - Check for other languages Manual - A Computer Program for HIV/AIDS Projections 3. Waking up to risk : corporate responses to HIV/AIDS in the workplace Report - 1/10/2003 - English - Check for other languages UNAIDS, UNRISD This paper looks at the response of large corporations to one of the most pressing developmental challenges facing countries in the global South today.HIV/AIDS. The paper presents results and analysis from the first global survey of transnational corporations. (TNCs) responses to the pandemic, as well as three surveys of large corporations in Brazil, the Philippines and South Africa, and case studies of selected corporations. 4. Strategies to strengthen NGO capacity in resource mobilization through business activities Report - 1/10/2001 - English - Check for other languages UNAIDS, PDA This UNAIDS Best Practice key material is directed at managers of national and international NGOs working on HIV/AIDS and other health and development issues. It is intended to increase their awareness of the opportunities, and possible problems, associated with alternative resource mobilization strategies, with a special focus on commercial activities. It is hoped that this will motivate NGO managers to determine and begin implementing the most appropriate resource-generating strategies to enable their organizations to continue and expand their important work. 5. UNAIDS at country level : progress report Report - 1/9/2004 - English - Check for other languages UNAIDS This progress report summarizes the achievements of CRD in 2003 and presents selected highlights in greater detail. 6. Stepping back from the edge : the pursuit of antiretroviral therapy in Botswana, South Africa and Uganda Report - 1/4/2004 - English - Check for other languages UNAIDS In 2003, UNAIDS is boosting its efforts to secure universal and equal access to antiretroviral treatment, with one of its nine cosponsoring organizationsthe World Health Organizationtaking a leading role. The campaign has adopted the goal of having 3 million people on treatment by 2005 as a fi rst step. This document spells out what it will take to achieve universal access to HIV treatment: vision, activism and risk-taking. The examples show communities and valiant individuals in action, overcoming the barrier of grossly inadequate resources to become models of effective activism. The challenges remain enormous, but with global will, combined with national and community action, the 'impossible' is being put within reach. 7. Planning the incorporation of antiretroviral therapy into comprehensive care programmes Report - 18/12/2002 - English - Check for other languages Preliminary findings from the introduction of antiretroviral (ARV) therapy in district-based comprehensive HIV care services in highly affected countries in Africa suggest that such an approach is both acceptable and feasible. With the price of ARV drugs decreasing, thus making the drugs more affordable for programmes and clients, programme managers and health planners need to consider a number of planning questions in order to design scaled up services while ensuring sustainability and feasibility within current health systems. 8. Force for change : World AIDS Campaign with young people : a report of activities Report - 1/10/1999 - English - Check for other languages UNAIDS The 1998 World AIDS Campaign increased young people’s participation in HIV/AIDS discussions, events, programmes, and decision-making bodies. It also mobilized support for young people already suffering from the epidemic’s impact, while emphasizing the links between HIV/AIDS and other factors critical to young people's health and development, including the promotion and protection of their human rights. This report is the first attempt to assess the 1998 World AIDS Campaign’s accomplishments. It provides an overview of the campaign’s general outcome, and then summarizes the events that took place in more than 80 countries under the auspice of the campaign, in accordance with the campaign’s five objectives. More detailed descriptions of a few selected projects illustrate some of the lessons learned. The report provides organizations with ideas on working with young people in the fight against the HIV/AIDS epidemic, and will help improve the planning and implementation of future campaigns 17. HIV and AIDS-related stigmatization, discrimination and denial : forms, contexts and determinants. Research studies from Uganda and India Report - 1/6/2000 - English - Check for other languages UNAIDS HIV/AIDS is as much a social phenomenon as it is a biological and medical concern. Across the world, the global pandemic of HIV/AIDS has shown itself capable of triggering responses of compassion, solidarity and support. But the disease is also associated with ostracism, repression and discrimination, and often denies people living with HIV/AIDS access to treatment, services and support. Little systematic research has taken place on the forms that HIV/AIDS-related stigmatization and discrimination take, the different contexts in which they occur and their varying determinants. Conducted by local investigators in India and Uganda, this research THE JONATHAN LIPPMAN, NYS CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVEJUDICIAL TRESPASSER GENOCIDE MANUAL CHIEF JUSTICE SUFFERING FROM SCHIZOPHRENIA, DUAL LIFE CHIEF JUSTICE AND DEADLY PATHOGEN ADMINISTRATOR. Search Document-search results for free text: JONATHAN LIPPMAN Documents 1 to 20 of the best 26 matching the query. Page 1 to 2, or view page: 1 | 2 Sort by: Rank | Date Show descriptions 1. Improving access to care in developing countries (CD-ROM) Report - 1/1/2002 - en UNAIDS, WHO 2. Force for change : World AIDS Campaign with young people : a report of activities Report - 1/10/1999 - en | sp | fr UNAIDS 3. AIM Version 4 Manual - 8/4/2003 - en | fr | sp | ru 4. UNAIDS-World Bank workshop : Building a sustainable M&E technical resource network in Southern and East Africa, Swaziland 6-10 May 2002 Report - 6/1/2002 - en UNAIDS 5. Scaling up antiretroviral therapy in resource limited settings : guidelines for a public health approach Report - 1/6/2002 - en WHO 6. HIV, health, and your community : a guide for action Report - 1/1/2001 - en Hesperian Foundation 7. Handbook on access to HIV/AIDS-related treatment : a collection of information, tools and resources for NGOs, CBOs and PLWHA groups Report - 20/5/2003 - en | fr UNAIDS, WHO, International HIV/AIDS Alliance 8. All-Party Parliamentary Group on AIDS : the UK, HIV and human rights, recommendations for the next five years Report - 7/1/2001 - en All-Party Parliamentary Group on AIDS 9. Handbook for legislators on HIV/AIDS, law and human rights : action to combat HIV/AIDS in view of its devastating human, economic and social impact Report - 1/11/1999 - en | fr UNAIDS, Inter-Parliamentary Union (IPU) 10. Improving access to care in developing countries : lessons from practice, research, resources and partnerships. Report from a meeting : advocating for access to care and sharing experiences, 29 November 1 December 2001, Paris Report - 1/1/2002 - en | fr UNAIDS, WHO, French Ministry of Foreign Affairs 11. HIV and AIDS-related stigmatization, discrimination and denial : forms, contexts and determinants. Research studies from Uganda and India Report - 1/6/2000 - en UNAIDS 12. Comparative analysis : research studies from India and Uganda. HIV and AIDS-related discrimination, stigmatization and denial Report - 2/6/2000 - en | fr | sp UNAIDS 13. Planning the incorporation of antiretroviral therapy into comprehensive care programmes Article-Excerpt - 18/12/2002 - en 14. Partners in prevention : international case studies of effective health promotion practice in HIV/AIDS Report - 3/1/1998 - en UNAIDS 15. Sustainable agricultural/rural development and vulnerability to the AIDS epidemic Report - 1/12/1999 - en UNAIDS, FAO 16. The impact of voluntary counselling and testing : a global review of the benefits and challenges Report - 1/6/2001 - en | sp | fr UNAIDS 17. AIDS education through Imams : a spiritually motivated community effort in Uganda Report - 1/10/1998 - en | fr UNAIDS, Islamic Medical Association of Uganda 18. HIV/AIDS and communication for behavioural and social change : programme experiences, examples, and the way forward. International workshop, Geneva, Switzerland, July 25 to 27, 2000 Report - 1/7/2000 - en UNAIDS 19. Defining moments in the fight against HIV/AIDS an eyewitness account of two decades Speech - 3/12/2002 - en 20. Address to the International Relations Committee, US House of Representatives : intensifying the global response to the HIV/AIDS epidemic, Wednesday, 16 September 1998, by Dr Peter Piot, UNAIDS Executive Director Speech - 16/9/1998 - en ___________________________________________ THE UNIVERSITY OF ROCHEST MEDICAL CENTER. HEADQUARTERS. Telephone Directory Search Enter your search word or phrase below: JONATHAN LIPPMAN ____________________________________________________________ 9. Kids Who Use The Emergency Room ...- URMC Press Release Summary Full http://www.urmc.rochester.edu/pr/news/archive/care.htm size 5189 bytes - 9/2/2003 4:44:14 PM GMT 10. Kids Who Use the Emergency Room... - URMC Press Release http://www.urmc.rochester.edu/pr/news/archive/kids.htm size 5185 bytes - 9/2/2003 4:43:27 PM GMT THE BELOW IS WHERE JONATHAN LIPPMAN FUNNELS HIS DEADLY PATHOGENS FROM. THIS IS AN EFFECTIVE MEANS OF WIPING OUT JUDGES, LAWYERS, DOCTORS AND OTHERS, AS I HAVE CITED IN THE DOCUMENTARIES I HAVE WRITTEN. JONATHAN LIPPMAN THINKS HE HAS AN EFFECTIVE MEANS OF CONTROLLING THE WORLD. HE HAS EASY ACCESS TO DEADLY PATHOGENS AND AN UN REGULATED 2 BILLION DOLLAR BUDGET. HIS PLAN IS EFFECTIVE. TOO BAD HE HAS BEEN DECIEVED. IN GOD’S TIME EPIDEMICS LISTED UNDER HIS NAME WILL END BECAUSE GOD IS IN CHARGE AND NOT JONATHAN LIPPMAN. AT THE END OF THIS DOCUMENTARY LOOK AT HIS TOP POSITION POWER TARGETS. THE BELOW IS JONATHAN LIPPMAN’S MANUFACTURE, CREATION AND PRODUCTION CENTER OF DEADLY PATHOGENS. THIS IS LIPPMAN’S HEADQUARTERS AND PLOY TO LAWLESSLY, INSANELY, AND DEMONICALLY RULE THE WORLD. THIS IS JONATHAN LIPPMAN’S HOME. WHERE HE HAS LOCAL ACCESS TO DEADLY PATHOGENS. ADAM URBANSKI GETS THE VICTIM TO THE HOSPITAL VIA AN INDUCED EMERGENCY ROOM PLACEMENT SUCH AS INDUCED CRIMINAL SLEEP RESEARCH WHICH EFFECTIVELY CREATES A TRAUMA PATIENT. SINCE THE TRAUMA PATIENTS ARE PLACED IN HERE, ,LIPPMAN HAS FULL REIGN IN DECIDING THE DESTINY OF THE VICTIM. THIS IS AN EFFECTIVE PLAN. YOU CAN GET RID OF ANYONE, WITHOUT LEAVING A SPEC OF EVIDENCE. YOU MAINTAIN UNEARNED POWER AND AUTHORITY AND YOU EFFECTIVELY EXTERMINATE, NEUTRALIZE ANYONE THAT CHALLENGES THE CORRUPTED STATUS QUO. The Infectious Diseases Unit of the Department of Medicine engages in a broad range of patient care, research, and educational activities. The Unit is comprised of 20 full-time Faculty, six clinical and research Fellows, 10 nurse practitioners and a staff of over 100 technicians, nurses, and administrative personnel. Patient care and consultation is provided for hospitalized and ambulatory adult patients with every variety of infectious disease, including bacterial, viral, fungal and parasitic infections, HIV infection, hospital-acquired infections, sexually transmitted diseases, and other infections related to surgery, transplantation, trauma, and cancer therapy. Our New York State designated AIDS Center provides comprehensive, state-of-the-art care for persons with HIV infection. The Infection Control Program for Strong Memorial Hospital, based within our Unit, tracks and investigates nosocomial infections and implements practices to prevent disease transmission. Research programs within the Infectious Diseases Unit are primarily supported by NIH awards and include an AIDS Clinical Trials Unit (ACTU), an HIV Vaccine Trials Unit (HVTU), and a Vaccine and Treatment Evaluation Unit (VTEU). The VTEU evaluates methods of control for non-AIDS infectious diseases. Other research programs include studies of human papillomavirus (HPV) infections, sexually transmitted diseases, influenza and other respiratory viruses, hospital-acquired infections, and trials of new antibiotics. Our Infectious Diseases Fellowship Program, encompassing advanced clinical and research training, has produced more than 75 infectious diseases specialists since 1970, including many leaders in the fields of virology and clinical infectious diseases. Our educational mission also extends to training of medical students, residents in internal medicine, and community physicians across western New York. THIS IS JONATHAN LIPPMAN’S MAIN PARTNER AND HIT MAN. HIS JOB IS TO GET THE VICTIM TO THE HOSPITAL. THIS IS A BONAFIDE POWER AND CONTROL HIT TEAM. GUESS WHO THEY WORK FOR? DUAL LIFE ADAM URBANSKI ROCHESTER CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT TEACHERS UNION PRESIDENT AND INDUCE SLEEP LABORATORY RESEARCH SPECIALIST. UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER MEDICAL CENTER Telephone Directory Search All U of R Web Servers ADAM URBANSKI, DUAL LIFE DEADLY SLEEP LABORATORY 2. University of Rochester Sleep Research Laboratory http://www.urmc.rochester.edu/smd/psych/srl/achristensenbio.htm size 10835 bytes - 4/23/2003 7:37:21 PM GMT 3. MACH 2010 Instructors/Teaching Assistants 7. Radiology, University of Rochester Medical Center 8. University of Rochester Sleep Research Laboratory LESSON 19: CRITICAL READING SERIES: DECEPTIONS, 21 STORIES OF TRICKERY AND FRAUD WITH EXERCISES FOR DEVELOPING CRITICAL READING SKILLS THE TUSKEGEE EXPERIMENT On May 16, 1997, President Bill Clinton issued an official apology. He directed it to a group of African-American men and their families. "No power on Earth can give you back the lives lost, the pain suffered, the years of internal torment and anguish," said Clinton. "What was done cannot be undone. But we can end the silence We can look you in the eye and finally say on behalf of the American people, what the United States government did was shameful, and I am sorry." 2 What did the government do that was so awful? The sad story began many years ago in Tuskegee, Alabama. In 1930, this small rural town had the only African American hospital in the South. Syphilis, a potentially deadly disease, was sweeping through black communities there. Syphilis attacks the central nervous system. It can cause victims to go blind or deaf, or to lose their sanity. It can deform the bones and teeth. Sometimes it attacks the heart. U.S. Public Health officials were alarmed by the growing rate of syphilis among African Americans in the South. To help stop the epidemic, they sent doctors to Tuskegee to treat the victims. Picture of President Clinton with Tuskegee survivor Hermon Shaw at the national apology to the survivors and their families. 3 But this was the time of the Great Depression. Money was scarce. Funds for the treatment program began to dry up. Then, in 1932, the focus of the Tuskegee program changed. U.S. health officials decided to see how syphilis destroyed the human body by withholding treatment from African American men. This secret study was called "The Tuskegee Study of Untreated Syphilis in the Negro Male." 4 It was a despicable plan. The fact was that doctors knew how devastating the disease could be if left untreated. A 20-year study on syphilis had already been done in Oslo, Norway. But the 1930s was a time of rampant racism in the United States. Many people in this country believed that blacks were biologically inferior to whites. The Oslo study had been done just with whites; doctors wondered if syphilis might affect blacks differently. Some African-American doctors and nurses went along with the study. They thought the results would show no difference between blacks and whites. In that case, they reasoned, the study would dispel the notion of African American inferiority. 5 The study began with a massive effort to recruit African-American subjects in the Tuskegee and the surrounding region. U.S. Public Health officials talked to African American men in churches, stores, and private homes. The recruiters did not mention that they were looking for men with syphilis. In fact, they never mentioned syphilis at all. Nor did they tell the men that the study was part of an experiment to test the theory of black inferiority. Instead the recruiters simply said they were selecting men for free medical check-ups. 6 These were hard times in rural Alabama. No one had much money. The recruiters made promises that were hard to resist. In addition to free medical care, they offered free hot lunches and free burial service. As a result, hundreds of African-American men, most with little or no schooling, volunteered for the study. 7 About 400 African-American men with syphilis were chosen to take part in the Tuskegee experiment. Another 200 African-American men without syphilis were picked to serve as a control group so comparisons could be made. The infected men were never told of their condition. They were simply used as human guinea pigs. 8 Looking back, many people believe that one of the worst aspects of the study was how happy the officials made the men feel. The men would be picked up in a fancy government station wagon for their check-ups. One African-American nurse, Eunice Rivers, later wrote, "[It] was a mark of distinction for many of the men who enjoyed waving to their neighbors as they drove by." Rivers added, they looked forward happily to having the government doctor take their blood pressure and listen to their hearts." 9 But the tragic truth was that the disease was slowly killing many of these men. Twenty-eight men, and perhaps as many as 100 more, died directly as a result of not getting treatment. And 154 more died from the hideous side effects of syphilis. Picture: President Clinton apologizes to survivors of the Tuskegee experiment. 10 When the Tuskegee study began, there were several treatments for syphilis. None worked well. Most often, chemicals were injected into the victim to slow the progression of the disease. Then, in 1943 the "wonder drug" penicillin was shown to cure syphilis. Within four years, it had become the number one weapon in the fight against syphilis. Just about every doctor in the country was using penicillin to cure syphilis patients. There was only one major exception to the rule-the researchers who were working with the African-American men of Tuskegee. The Public Health doctors refused to give these men the new drug. In short, the men in the Tuskegee experiment were condemned to die in the name of science. 11 And that was the way it remained for more than 25 years, until a newspaper reporter named Jean Heller got wind of the scandal. She spent three weeks doing, research. Then, on July 25, 1972, she filed her story. Her grim account of the Tuskegee experiment shocked and outraged many people. A government panel was quickly set up to look into the study. As a result of this probe, the Tuskegee study was shut down. But by 1972, those African-American men still living had suffered 40 years of deliberate medical abuse. 12 In 1973, the NAACP filed a class action suit against the U.S. government on behalf of the survivors. The victims and their families settled for $9 million. The following year, the U.S. government developed new rules governing research conduct. The Tuskegee experiment, with its human guinea pigs, will never be repeated. 13 Still, the bitter memories lingered among the families of the victims. Albert Julkes, Jr., the son of one of the participants, believes that the Tuskegee experiment was "one of the worst atrocities" ever committed by the U.S. government. Says Julkes, "You don't treat dogs that way TOO BAD IT DID NOT AND HAS NOT STOPPED! CONVENTION on the PREVENTION and PUNISHMENT OF the CRIME of GENOCIDE 1948 The Contracting Parties, Having considered the declaration made by the General Assembly of the United Nations in its resolution 96(I) dated 11 December 1946 that genocide is a crime under international law, contrary to the spirit and aims of the United Nations and condemned by the civilized world; Recognizing that at all periods of history genocide has inflicted great losses on humanity; and Being convinced that, in order to liberate mankind from such an odious scourge, international co-operation is required, Hereby agree as hereinafter provided: ARTICLE 1 The Contracting Parties confirm that genocide, whether committed in time of peace, or in time of war, is a crime under international law which they undertake to prevent and to punish. ARTICLE 2 In the present Convention, genocide means any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group as such: (a) Killing members of the group; (b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group; (c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part; (d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group; (e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group. ARTICLE 3 The following acts shall be punishable: (a) Genocide; (b) Conspiracy to commit genocide; (c) Direct and public incitement to commit genocide; (d) Attempt to commit genocide; (e) Complicity in genocide ARTICLE 4 Persons committing genocide or any of the other acts enumerated in Article 3 shall be punished, whether they are constitutionally responsible rulers, public officials or private individuals. ARTICLE 5 The Contracting Parties undertake to enact, in accordance with their respective Constitutions, the necessary legislation to give effect to the provisions of the present Convention and, in particular, to provide effective penalties for persons guilty of genocide or of any of the other acts enumerated in Article 3. ARTICLE 6 Persons charged with genocide or any of the other acts enumerated in Article 3 shall be tried by a competent tribunal of the State in the territory of which the act was committed, or by such international panel tribunal as may have jurisdiction with respect to those Contracting Parties which shall have accepted its jurisdiction. ARTICLE 7 Genocide and the other acts enumerated in Article 3 shall not be considered as political crimes for the purpose of extradition. The Contracting Parties pledge themselves in such cases to grant extradition in accordance with their laws and treaties in force. ARTICLE 8 Any Contracting Party may call upon the competent organs of the United Nations to take such action under the Charter of the United Nations as they consider appropriate for the prevention and suppression of acts of genocide or any of the other acts enumerated in Article 3. ARTICLE 9 Disputes between the Contracting Parties relating to the interpretation, application or fulfilment of the present Convention, including those relating to the responsibility of a State for genocide or any of the other acts enumerated in Article 3 shall be submitted to the International Court of Justice at the request of any of the parties to the dispute. ARTICLE 10 The present Convention, of which the Chinese, English, French, Russian and Spanish texts are equally authentic, shall bear the date of 9 December 1948. ARTICLE 11 The present Convention shall be open 31 December 1949 for signature on behalf of any Member of the United Nations and any non-member State to which an invitation to sign has been addressed by the General Assembly. The present Convention shall be ratified, and the instruments of ratification shall be deposited with the Secretary-General of the United Nations. After 1 January 1950 the present Convention may be acceded to on behalf of any Member of the United Nations and of any non-member State which has received an invitation as aforesaid. Instruments of accession shall be deposited with the Secretary of the United Nations. ARTICLE 12 Any Contracting Party may at any time, by notification addressed to the Secretary-General of the United Nations, extend the application of the present Convention to all or any of the territories for the conduct of whose foreign relations that Contracting Party is responsible. ARTICLE 13 On the day when the first twenty instruments of ratification or accession have been deposited, the Secretary-General shall draw up a proses-verbal and transmit a copy thereof to each Member of the United Nations and to each of the non-member States contemplated in Article 12. The present Convention shall come into force on the ninetieth day following the date of deposit of the twentieth instrument of ratification or succession. ARTICLE 14 The present Convention shall remain in effect for a period of ten years as from the date of its coming into force. It shall thereafter remain in force for successive periods of five years for such Contracting Parties as have not denounced it at least six months before the expiration of the coming period. Denunciation shall be effected by a written notification addressed to the Secretary-General of the United Nations. ARTICLE 15 If as a result of denunciations, the number of Parties to the present Convention shall become less than sixteen, the Convention shall cease to be in force as from the date on which the last of the denunciations shall become effective. ARTICLE 16 A request for the revision of the present Convention may be made at any time by any Contracting Party by means of a written notification in writing addressed to the Secretary-General. The General Assembly shall decide upon the steps, if any, to be taken in respect of such a request. ARTICLE 17 The Secretary-General of the United Nations shall notify all Members of the United Nations and the non-member States contemplated in Article 11 of the following: (a) Signatures, ratifications and accessions received in accordance with Article 11; (b) Notifications received in accordance with Article 12; (c) The date upon which the present Convention comes into force in accordance with Article 13; (d) Denunciations received in accordance with Article 14; (e) The abrogation of the Convention in accordance with Article 15; (f) Notifications received in accordance with Article 16. ARTICLE 18 The original of the present Convention shall be deposited in the archives of the United Nations. A certified copy of the Convention shall be transmitted to each Member of the United Nations and to each of the non-member States contemplated in Article 11. ARTICLE 19 The present Convention shall be registered by the Secretary-General of the United Nations on the date of its coming into force. If genocide, as defined in the United Nations Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, applies to an organized and premeditated act -- committed by persons in a position of power against members a relatively vulnerable group of people -- it must exclude hapless combatants in civil wars brought on by outside interference, no matter how gruesome and regardless of the scale and intensity of the atrocities that take place. Furthermore, it is the preoccupation with demographics that is the embodiment of genocidal intent, as is illustrated by both the history and the language of the treaty. Thus, a planned program of population control -- carried out by a powerful bloc of countries against unwilling individuals in exploited nations -- seems to be precisely the crime which the convention was designed to prevent. And if these measures are undertaken with the will to impose on targets a permanent condition of powerlessness, the act becomes virtually indistinguishable from the actual extermination of those peoples. There are many who have complained about coercive or racist motives behind the global population control program, about the way policies have been imposed on nations dependent on foreign aid and credit, about the untold human suffering caused by contraceptives given under horrendous conditions to ambivalent users, and about the devious and disrespectful ways in which these anti-natalist campaigns are brought to the people. But little has been said about finding ways in which these practices can be effectively resisted at a time when unity within the former "non-aligned" bloc has been ruptured and when one nation standing alone would pay a heavy price for confronting the global power structure. But the Genocide Convention may offer real hope to the oppressed not because there is any possibility of directly using international law to restrain or punish those responsible, of course, but rather as an organizing principle and a focal point for cross-national and cross-cultural solidarity among the many and diverse peoples of the south. The concept may even be broad enough to include not just birth prevention, but the debt crisis, covert operations, and other tactics employed against the emerging nations of the south. As such it is not politicians so much as intellectuals and academics who will have to take the initial lead in educating people about the nature of genocide and its bearing on contemporary north-south issues. While there may not be the least likelihood of successfully bringing charges against those responsible for the situation of demographic and political warfare that exists in the world today, there is a genuine opportunity to appeal to that moral authority that resides in the sense of decency and conscience of all peoples and to bring the matter forcefully to the table at every international discussioI f the genocide treaty means anything at all, it is that a powerful institution or class of people must never again be allowed to inflict harm on those over whom they seek to consolidate control. And no abuse of power should be more dreaded than that committed by a group of people or nations who have appointed themselves the arbiters of how many people will be allowed to make up the whole of another group. HE IS A NERVOUS WRECK HERE! John M. Walker, Jr. From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to: navigation, search Fatal traffic accident On the evening of October 17, 2006, as he began his drive home to Madison, Connecticut, Walker's Ford Escape automobile struck a police officer named Daniel Picagli on Chapel Street in New Haven, Connecticut. The officer, who was dressed in dark clothing and may have been wearing reflective gear, was directing traffic at a road construction site for AT&T in rush hour at dusk in the rain.[1] [2] There were no construction signs or traffic cones marking off the site.[3] Picagli died four days later on October 21, 2006.[4] Walker stopped immediately, and New Haven police have said the cause was not related to drugs or alcohol. [5] Police were initially interested in whether speed could have been a factor;[6] an article about the police investigation now reports that Walker "was traveling at a slow speed through the dark and rainy construction site."[7] ______________________________________________________________ SHE IS DEAD BECAUSE NO ONE DID ANYTHING WHEN I INFORMED THE BELOW THAT SHE WAS WORKING WITH A DISGUISED KILLER, JONATHAN LIPPMAN’S HIT MAN, ADAM URBANSKI. TWO YEARS AFTER THE WARNING SHE WAS KILLED AS IS STATED AND I AM NOT A PSYCHIC. HER POSITION WAS TARGETED AND WANTED BADLY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! October 30, 2003 Sandra Feldman, President American Federation of Teachers 555 New Jersey Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20001 Re: Adam Urbanski: New York State #1 Infectious Hit Man Working With the University of Rochester Medical Center, Sleep Research Laboratory, neutralizing and exterminating human kind, under the disguise, but, defined as Induced Criminal Medical Atrocities. Dear Ms. Feldman: I write this letter to inform you of the above substantiated with the attached facts and documentation. Moreover, being a survivor of one of Mr. Urbanski’s hits qualifies me to write this letter. It is imperative that your office is informed of Mr. Urbanshi’s vicious and malicious hidden abnormal agenda. Foremost, I am a former teacher of the Rochester School District. Unfortunately, I met and worked with Mr. Urbanski for several years. He is one of the most racist, incompetent, greedy, power hungry, vindictive, and psychotic characters, I have ever met in my life. Moreover, after surviving a deadly hit he put on me in Rochester New York, through his well designed and intricate neutralization and extermination plans, defined as his sleep research criminal regime, I am more than qualified to write this letter and share what I have experienced. In good faith, I write this letter to do my share to save a life or lives from these documented well designed and intricate criminally insane neutralization and extermination processes I have endured and survived. Above all, I simply thank God that I was rescued from Mr. Urbanski’s attempt to kill me. However, since there are no restraints on his criminal activities, he has chosen to follow me year after year with a vengeance. See the attached documentation. However, several other educators have fell victim and prey to his malicious, vicious, legally intertwined, medical atrocities. Other educators and I have endured psychotic hate crimes, from Urbanshi’s abuse of power in the law department, union and the medical field. Mr. Urbanski is a danger to society as a whole, much more children. He is well intertwined in the legal and medical field, which facilitates his malicious and vicious killings, hits, and induced malicious hospitalizations. See the attached letter to Inside Edition dated October 12, 2003. See the attached letter dated October 19, 2003 and research from the University of Rochester. Page 1 of 5. He is a top hit man, hiding under the union, to disguise his chosen profession as a Criminal Sleep Research Specialist working with the infectious disease department in the University of Rochester, killing and arranging malicious hospitalizations, medical atrocities and phenomenon’s, defined as criminal neutralization and extermination processes. Mr. Urbanski put a deadly hit on my life in 1994. See the attached lawless and falsified documents, listed as Exhibit N in the attached Reply Appendix and Exhibits 8, 9, and 10 in the attached letter to Ashcroft dated September 26, 2003. Urbanshi arranged this malicious and vicious neutralization and extermination process. The doctor was enjoined by his lawless legal and medical regime. The legal regime includes a lawless law license and one of the Chief Justices in the Unified Court Systems. See the attached letter to Inside Edition, dated October 12, 2003, the attached letter dated October 10, 2003, and the attached research from the University of Rochester attached to the letter of October 10, 2003. The Medical Regime includes members of the legal Regime. They are all associated with the Infectious Disease Department in the University of Rochester Medical Center, through induced trauma and Emergency room placements. Urbanski’s real job is to get the victim to the hospital by enforcing the sleep research laboratory stratagems, defined as criminal induced sleep deprivation. The induced sleep deprivation usually leads to an induced nervous breakdown coupled with the lawless stratagems identified in the letter to Inside Edition. This leads the victim to the doctor and Emergency room. The Emergency room contact is identified in the letter to Inside Edition dated October 12, 2003 and the exhibits attached. These lawless members each hold law degrees and are members of the University of Rochester Medical Center trauma, Emergency room placements and the Infectious Disease Unit. The plan works effectively. You can get rid of anyone, without any evidence, appearing as a medical atrocity. When in reality, it is a malicious, vicious and deadly hit to neutralize and exterminate criminally innocent human life. This is done to keep power in the judiciary, bar, union, win lawsuits, quiet witnesses, intimidate, discredit truthful testimony, and a host of ungodly and lawless reasons. Members in the above mentioned organizations usually have no clue because this criminal regime operates as a secret society including key players with key positions. If you are not a part of this regime, you may become a victim. Consequently, the purpose of this letter is to save any life possible by informing human beings of this criminal operation. I have been targeted for over 10 years because I am probably one of the only survivor’s due to the grace of our Sovereign God. Consequently, maliciously and vindictively, Mr. Urbanshi continues to enforce criminal extermination processes on me through my jobs, despite exemplary evidence and ratings. He resorted, used and abused his lawless regime and disrupted the education of children, two unions, and two school districts, epitomizing his anger and revenge for not capturing me in his deadly and criminal sleep laboratory research neutralization. Mr. Urbanski has arranged and ordered for the last 10 years ongoing lawless exterminations of my income simply because I did not fall prey to his ungodly, masterminded, criminally insane, neutralization process that has worked successfully for years. Mr. Urbanski and his criminal regime psychotically targeted my senior citizen parents through their medical care to destroy them to destroy me. See the attached letters and evidence dated October 19, 2003 and October 14, 2003. He used his lawless contacts with key positions in the Bar and judiciary association, to disrupt the legal departments in two unions and school districts, to lawlessly and vindictively target, exploit and exterminate me. Not once has a termination been for cause. None of the enforced lawless acts have anything to substantiate the many lawless acts. Evidence is clear; work is exemplary despite murderous work conditions. However, miraculously the law is disregarded and lawlessness is enforced. He used his judicial contact to disrupt the judiciary. See the attached. The judiciary has been enjoined to disregard law and enforce lawlessness to target me for this secret society criminal regime defined as Urbanshi’s revenge for escaping his well plotted induced hospitalization and murder plan. Members of the judiciary have been enjoined and have enforced lawlessness that facilitates Urbanshi’s criminal neutralization and extermination plan. Consequently, Urbanski organized a death trap, a neutralization process that I escaped. Thereafter he used his lawless legal contacts to effectuate numerous lawless exterminations. Thereafter, he used his infectious disease contacts to create and falsify medical documents. Thereafter, he used his infectious disease contacts to infect witnesses, neutralizing and eradicating their testimonies. Each union person wanting nothing to do with this crime ring has been killed and neutralized. No medical phenomenon here. This is the same pattern and practice enforced in Rochester New York. Educators, lawyers and other innocent victims, are exterminated and neutralized under the disguise of a medical phenomenon. Exhibit O, attached to the Reply Appendix is another example of a medical phenomenon. Just like exhibit O, was maliciously and falsely created and disseminated at my job, is the same infectious medical phenomenon that kills and infects innocent victims under the disguise of a medical phenomenon. Examples of other medical phenomenon’s Urbanski has ordered and arranged are listed in the Reply Appendix attached. Additionally, samples of the moving of the medical phenomenon’s to New York City under the leadership of Urbanshi, is the killing of the Hempstead Union Attorney, Daniel Gallinson under the disguise of a miraculous newly erupted medical phenomenon. The same newly erupted medical phenomenon that infected and killed the Hempstead Union attorney is the same newly erupted infected virus that victimized the Hempstead union president and my mother. This same medical phenomenon also killed the teacher’s husband that I shared a classroom with last year. The teacher’s husband was a healthy young doctor, but miraculously died of a newly erupted medical phenomenon. His name is Dr. Schloss. He is dead. These medical phenomena exemplify patterns and practices of the Adam Urbanshi University of Rochester Criminal Medical Center Regime, infested from the trauma and Emergency unit, straight to the psychiatric infectious disease unit. Based on the evidence, these are not medical phenomena. They are criminal medical hits as exemplified in each and every exhibit attached, but miraculously overlooked and disregarded, just as the law is. The evidence and laws do not lie. Criminal infectious diseases are being maliciously disseminated to kill, neutralize and exterminate, over a law suit, threat to blow the whistle, position of power, racist reasons and for revenge. If these criminal killings, disguised as medical phenomena’s, from the kids who use the emergency rooms, to the infectious disease department, are not stopped, it will only get worse. These are criminal killings disguised as induced medical atrocities/phenomenon’s that must be stopped. The medical and legal regimes used to facilitate the medical killings and atrocities substantiated in this matter must be dismantled. The evidence cannot lie. I thank God and due to the grace of God, I have never fell victim to any of the criminal induced hospital placements that usually effectuate induced death and disease, by injection and pills. The many years of observing innocent victims in Rochester, New York and now in NYC, fall prey to these criminally insane, malicious, induced neutralization and extermination processes require exposure and dismantling. The documented criminal neutralization and extermination processes epitomize historically defined iniquitous acts. These criminal acts have to be dismantled, because, they simply get worse. They have progressed across the states due to Mr. Urbanski’s greed. His disguise as a union president and vice president of AFT needs to be seriously investigated. His hidden personality as a criminal sleep research laboratory specialist in the University of Rochester Medical Center needs to be investigated, with respect to motive, agenda, past practices and affiliation. My experiences with him from Rochester New York to the unions and schools in Downstate New York require me to publicly state that Mr. Urbanski is a top hit man manifesting his criminal sleep deprivation research to destroy human kind. His sleep deprivation research practices are demonic, medical crimes and practiced to the point where he finds it pleasurable, habitual and he is without restraint. To this end, I urge all competent educators, lawyers, judges, and competitors to be informed. Mr. Urbanski and his criminal legal and medical regime have exerted manifested forces of darkness that can and will be destroyed by the Sovereign power of God. Please do what you can to stop the induced, criminal, psychotic, malicious and vicious documented neutralization and extermination processes detailed in the below documents, disguised and designed to facilitate criminal medical atrocities that are criminally destroying human life and dismantling justice and truth in the court. I have attached the following documentation to substantiate the above: 1.Ongoing Lawlessness in the courts: Letter Dated October 29, 2003 to Judge Hurley and Letter from Hempstead Attorneys enforcing lawlessness in the court, both documents 6 pages. Most Recent complaint submitted to the Eastern District Court. 2.26 pages of documented lawlessness disregarded by the judiciary facilitating lawless delay and extermination process detailed in each attachment. 3.Letter dated October 19, 2003 with research and documentation from the University of Rochester Medical Center, 15 pages, 4.Letter From the Unified Court System, Dated October 10, 2003 with attached research from The University of Rochester Medical Center, 5.Letter dated October 14, 2003 to a Dr. D’Olimpio, 6.Letter dated October 12, 2003 to Inside Edition, 16 pages. 7.A lawless medical insurance plan dated December 1994, that substantiates the facts and lawlessness documented in the detailed neutralization crimes described in the above attachment. 8.Letter To Ashcroft dated September 26, 2003 with Exhibits 1-10. 9.Letter To Ashcroft dated September 22, 2003 with Appellant’s Memorandum Reply Brief In Opposition To The Apellees Memorandum Brief and A Reply Appendix for The Appellant. Sincerely, Miriam Snyder Xc: Ministers Across The Nation Senate Judiciary Committee Human Rights Departments American Center For Law and Justice Honorable Congressmen and women Inside Edition Channel 7, Like It Is Concerned Educators November 23, 2006 Emailed To: pscoffice@psc-cuny.org Mailed To: Professional Staff Congress City University of New York 61 Broadway, Suite 1500 New York, New York 10006 Dear Union Persons: I am forwarding the attached response letter from Robert Diaz, Vice President for Legal Affairs. It discontinued services and mentions a letter I do not have. Please, if possible forward the appointment letter mentioned and please have him correct my address on his letter. It states 36B as the apartment. My apartment number is 6B. I did not pick up my last check, the check of November 16, 2006 and would greatly appreciate having it mailed to the correct address above, as well as the rest of payments mentioned in his letter. I recognize payments would not exist without the true meaning of unionism and thank God this Thanksgiving for such. It is Thanksgiving and I thank God that the students and I are safe. I thank God for a wonderful and rewarding teaching experience at BMCC until the SYNDER code hate crime initiation was prioritized, as stated and attached to my letter and email of November 20, 2006 to the administration. I thank God for meeting wonderful students and staff. The students did their homework and were simply good students ready to learn. The staff was wonderful until the SYNDER code phenomenon and enforcement was prioritized. I thank God that they, the BMCC staff and students, will no longer be used and or enjoined in the attached administratively enforced SYNDER code hate crime initiation phenomenon that I had nothing to do with. On behalf of education, it is my prayer that the leadership will be penalized for inflicting this phenomenon and obstruction of the educational process on the students because of her willingness to enjoin The Borough of Manhattan Community College in well documented and enforced education hate crimes and a documented deadly conspiracy against rights, despite being told not to. I was penalized for the administrator’s enjoinment, but I thank God I did not wait for the SYNDER code hate crime deadly implementation stage, which is designed to kill under disguise and or deceitfully destroy the victim/target. I pray that unions work to correct this so no other educator is compelled to fight off hate crime enforcement, particularly as a means of operation. I thank God for knowing that shortly, Dual life Jonathan Lippman, NYS Chief Injustice and Deadly Pathogen Specialist coupled with Adam Urbanski, another dual life specialist, Sleep Laboratory Research Specialist and The Rochester Teachers Association Union President will be stopped from deliberately inflicting racist and hate crime phenomena in public education as well as will be stopped from having people killed under the multiple disguises researched and identified in the Documentaries I have written and submitted to the authorites below. In summary, I worked almost ten years in the Rochester New York Public School system with Adam Urbanski. He is the teachers union president. He is a documented racist, power hungry and control fanatic. He is one of the main avenues where the public education hate crimes are ordered from. In 1994 God rescued me from one of Adam Urbanski’ s and Jonathan Lippman’s sleep research induced trauma deadly killing operations. I thank God for the rescue. I thank God for bringing closure to the above attempted killing by finding the attempted killer programs mentioned above under Adam Urbanski’s name in the University of Rochester Medical Center search engine and the Deadly Pathogen programs under Jonathan Lippman’s name in the World Health Organization search engine. I thank God that their intricate, well financed, murder plan did not work. I thank God I have publicized it so it never ever works again. I thank God that despite them wanting revenge for God rescuing me, God has chosen not to let their revenge kill me, despite multiple documented attempts, including education hate crime enforcement, multiple lawless income executions and a vicious blacklisting that would have killed anybody not believing in God. I thank God for the little survival money that I have and thank God for the wealth I will have. I thank God for faith and knowing that believing is seeing. I thank God for knowing that God does not lie, Godly justice will prevail. I thank God that I contacted all authorities in NYS government and forwarded my testimony of how Urbanski and Lippman’s operations tried to wipe me off this earth in a similar manner to the way their deadly programs have wiped out half of Africa. I thank God that Adam Urbanski and Jonathan Lippman’s programs will no longer be disguised killer operations. All will know of them. I thank God that my testimony, the documentation of the killer programs, the attached documented patterned public education hate crime enforcement settlement was sent to the appropriate authorities before I came here. I thank God for documenting my attempts to stop these enforced public education hate crimes prior to coming here. I thank God that the record will show, that in good faith and out of concern for Saundra Feldman, former AFT (American Federation of Teachers) president’s, safety and life, I immediately contacted her office when I discovered the written documentation of Adam Urbanski’s sleep laboratory research/induced trauma program that was used to try to kill me and disguise a designated placement. Upon discovering that one of her staff people, Adam Urbanski, was a killer who used his dual life as a sleep pathologist to try to kill me, I contacted her to warn her that she would be a target to be killed under a medical phenomenon as long as Adam Urbanski was in the AFT, power hungry, ruthless, without restrain, and another character with an unregulated budget. I wish somebody listened. She may have been alive today. Precautions could have been taken. Please see my attached below warning letter to her. I contacted Saundra Feldman’s office because I knew Adam Urbanski was an executive officer in the American Federation of Teachers, AFT. I knew he was power hungry, and had his eye on her position. I had worked with him for almost 10 years previously. He had tried to have me killed with his sleep research/induced trauma operation. I wanted her to know that she was working with an attempted killer. I wanted her to know of his dual life so she could protect herself. I knew how he operated. I knew he was power hungry, racist, and was using the law and contract to make it look like he was so powerful in the Rochester Public School System. The school’s legal department and the entire system was at Urbanski’s mercy via he had all the man made laws that was convenient to whatever he wanted. He did not hide his racism. He kept it going in all the education programs. I wrote a memo about one of his racist achievement programs by design and used law to substantiate this claim and that was it. Phonomena were enforced ever since and the Can You Prove It Phenomena initiated and continued thereafter. I questioned his hatred of groups of people, his use of Willie Lynch stratagems to destroy people, his control over the education system to fester racism, his lack of competency, his inability to communicate with diverse populations in a civilized manner, his year after year leadership despite teacher dissatisfaction. But, he had the legal contacts and was always able to get the most money. This fooled the teachers and if an educator went against him he/she would miraculously become ill and disappear. This pattern was ridiculous more than I have ever seen in all of down state New York. However, nothing could be proven. But the pattern was clear, if you go against Adam Urbanski, you were phenomenally going to become ill and placed at the mercy of medical contacts, usually out of the University of Rochester medical center. This was a silencing. I watched this pattern for almost 10 years. The Adam Urbanski silencing operation and pattern was lethally inflicted on me, but I made it out before the disguised killing operation was fully implemented. Consequently, I am probably the only survivor and they want revenge, for me simply being a God chosen survivor. I thank God for life because I sure could be dead under the sleep laboratory research induced trauma placement killer program and or one of Jonathan Lippman’s other deadly programs identified in the Documentaries I have written and submitted to the below authorities. Jonathan Lippman and Adam Urbanski want me dead because they have been using the medical and legal system to kill under disguise for years. They are eugenicist. They are sick people with money. Despite being racist, they kill anybody, because most people would not do what I am doing to fight back, most people are unaware of their effective plans and the rest are dead under disguise. Knowing this, the deep corruption embedded in Adam Urbanski’s dual life, I had to inform Saundra Feldman that one of her staff people in the AFT was someone who tried to kill me. I had to and I did. No one listened and or my mail was tampered with. Please see the attached warning letter to Saundra Feldman dated October 30, 2003. I warned Saundra Feldman’s office that a former union president that tried to have me killed by his sleep research induced trauma phenomenon was in the AFT. I knew she would be targeted as long as Adam Urbanski was acting like a union president in the American Federation of Teachers. I wanted everyone to know about his dual life as a sleep laboratory specialist because this is what was used to try to kill me under the medical phenomenon operations identified in the Documentaries I have written. No one listened. Yes, my letters to Ms. Feldman sounded convoluted, but I tried. I did my best notwithstanding all the corruption that was being enforced on me at the time. All of my income was targeted and lawlessly executed, enforced lawlessness was maliciously incorporated in every aspect of my life but I still tried to warn her. My money and housing was targeted to facilitate another disguised killing. But I tried to tell her she would be next to die under a medical phenomenon as long as Adam Urbanski and Jonathan Lippman’s programs were in operation and each had an unregulated and unrestrained budget. I warned Saundra Feldman that she would be killed under a medical phenomenon. Two years later, unfortunately, she died and or was killed under a medical phenomenon, just like Gallinson. No one can prove anything, but two educators are dead under a medical phenomenon, that I was almost killed from. One immediately was killed under a medical phenomenon after helping me get the criminal settlement attached below and in my letter of November 20, 2006. The other, two years after I informed her of Adam Urbanski’s dual life as a sleep laboratory specialist and Lippman’s easy access to deadly pathogens. I gave my warning in good faith because when I saw that Adam Urbanski was actively involved in AFT, I knew he had his eye on her position. He was creeping to the top of the United States of America’s top union. Meanwhile, God rescued me from a bonafide deadly induced Adam Urbanski sleep research initiated phenomenon that was supposed to land a trauma placement in their hospital, but did not. I could have cared less who thought what. I wanted Saundra Feldman to know about Adam Urbanski and what he did to me and what he had the potential of doing to her. I have my letters and return receipts. They sound off but if I was ever listened to and or given the proper support to substantiate what I was saying, she might be alive today. My letters to Ms. Feldman sound off because I was dealing with a 2 billion dollar unregulated budget that was being used to drive me crazy. I had to try to keep food on my table, and stop relentless and repeated lawless income executions, homelessness set ups, like I am doing now. I read my letters to Ms. Feldman and say yes they sound off, but I tried to warn her. Remember I had nothing to gain by going public with my testimony to her. It was done with the deliberate intent to do whatever I could do to make sure she was aware and would know that somebody deadly had his eye on her position. I wanted her to be careful because Adam Urbanski, with the judicial coverage of Jonathan Lippman, is, lethal, deadly and tried to have me killed under disguise since 1994. I wanted her to know that all of their disguised killing operations are premised off of Can You Prove It! The only evidence usually are the dead bodies of their victims and targets. I did what was right and I wish someone listened. The Jonathan Lippman and Adam Urbanski: Can You Prove It Disguised Killer Operations must be stopped. I wish somebody had listened because no one could make up my testimonies and no one could make up each of their names respectively being listed under their killer medical programs, while posing as top leadership in government. A key factor with these dual life characters is to hold top leadership positions. The positions are the top positions in education, the union, the judiciary, coupled with easy access to deadly pathogens, in the United States of America. A lot of damage under the disguise of a phenomenon can be done with this design. A lot of damage/deaths have occurred under the judicial leadership and coverage of Jonathan Lippman and his documented deadly pathogen programs while administering the NYS court system. One of the death programs listed under his name while he is supposed to be administering the court system effectuated over 13 million dead under the disguise of a social phenomenon. See my most recent affidavit with the evidence dated September 30, 2006 and submitted to the below offices. Each affidavit, evidence and Documentary will be sent by this Monday November 27, 2006. First, with respect to the top position in the judiciary with an unregulated 2 billion dollar budget and deadly pathogen programs, you can wipe out the people in the continent with the richest resources on earth under the disguise of a social phenomenon, embedded in Can You Prove It! Second, Adam Urbanski s motive for wanting the top union position in the United States of America’s Union, AFT, is because he can get Jonathan Lippman via the judiciary and law departments to control education departments. Urbanski would look like the great achiever to unions and teachers because everything he wants legally would be granted and in reality this would be done by design. Just like he controls the Rochester Public School system. It appears as he has some teachers’ union phenomenal power, when in reality his power is embedded in Jonathan Lippman’s corruption, title and unregulated 2 billion dollar budget. Adam Urbanski is Jonathan Lippman’s hit man. Urbanski’s job is to get the victim to the hospital via a trauma placement, initiated by induced sleep laboratory research. My Documentaries show the placement of the trauma patient is conveniently located in Jonathan Lippman’s program territory. They had a placement waiting for me and because God never let it happen, they want revenge. The continuous attempts to have me killed under multiple disguises compelled me to investigate and research. I almost dropped dead when I found the documentation to the killer plan I lived. I have not stopped writing since, but, because corruption has been prioritized many innocent people are dead that could be alive if authorities enforced equal protection of the law and public protection measures secured by God and the law. The only difference between Adam Urbanski and Jonathan Lippman’s disguised killings and the disgused killing I am under now via repititiuos lawless income executions, organized crime isolations and silencing, Hate Crime enforcement, is that these killing attempts are not disguised and are PUBLICIZED as loud as I can SCREAM. I have been targeted for silencing and extermination by documented evidenced criminals with dual life indisputable phonomena and conflict of interest top government positions. An analogy of what is going is this: Someone used a gun to kill you, but because of God’s miraculous power the bullet missed and continues to miss you. Ten years later, you find the gun with the killers name on it. Only God can do this. What do you do? You contact authorities and you tell the possible next victim because of her close proximity to the killer and because you know the killer is power hungry and ruthless. I say this to say if NYS government was functionng in a non corrupted mode and investigations were launched, the results would show that my testimony and research are quite on point, real and true. Moreover, many people would be alive that were targeted for disguised killings based on these two documented dual life phonomena specialists’, greed, power hungriness and control. I thank God I wrote my letter of November 20, 2006 because the repeated, unregulated enforced SYNDER code hate crimes can only lead to killing another person under disguise, because the Adam Urbanski attempted murder plan and charge was disregarded by the judiciary and all of NYS government under the lawless, ruthless and deadly leadership of Jonathan Lippman. The documented public education hate crimes, targeting, enjoinments and disregard of such must be stopped. I am sorry that NYS government allowed and disregarded the above and attached crimes and evidence. It is my prayer that other educators will not continue to be killed under the above and documented enforced public education and public safety hate crimes. On behalf of public education and public safety I have no choice but to report these repeated malicious and vicious documented public education hate crimes under the leadership of Adam Urbanski and Jonathan Lippman. While I thank God for rescuing me from the above and for being alive, I am compelled to mention that Can You Prove It hate crime Phonomena continue because they were never regulated. To date, my home is being terrorized by Can You Prove It Phenomena. I have made several police reports. Recently all of my ESL listening CD’s were busted in half while they were in my library in my home. This is how innocent people are found dead, poisoned, and how deadly pathogens can be implanted to kill under the Can You Prove It Phonomena. Because I can not prove this, I am additionally not supposed to mention it. I am supposed to act like my listening CD’s miraculously busted in half on their own. This is the direct reason the above characters continue killing under disguise and want me silenced because I have reported their crimes every step of the way praying that nobody else will be subjected to this inhumane, lawless, hate based, above the law treatment. Adam Urbanski and Jonathan Lippman at minimum, should be disciplined and penalized under a direct conflict of interest, for having two deadly programs listed under their names while holding top delicate government jobs. Jonathan Lippman is administering the court system and deadly pathogens at the same time and Adam Urbanski is working close to children and educators, administering involuntary sleep research/induced trauma and destroying unionism as exemplified in the use of NYSUT, Noel Cohen letterhead. Above all, a well documented educator is telling the world how they tried to kill her and how the disguised killing operations work, coupled with over 13, million dead as evidence. If the above the law treatment of Jonathan Lippman and Adam Urbanski was removed, coupled with taking away their easy access to deadly pathogens and money, the following would occur: The social phenomena programs listed under Jonathan Lippman’s name and leadership would be stopped. The social phenomena killings documented under Jonathan Lippman’s name and leadership would be curtailed, at minimum or stopped. The people in Jonathan Lippman’s social phenomena programs would have a chance to heal and AFT’s invested money for healing these places would work. The enforced education hate crime phenomena would disappear and or be minimized, as long as there were penalties for individuals and or groups enforcing hate crimes in public education as exemplified in my exhibits. The Education Can You Prove It hate crimes and or disguised killings would be stopped, curtailed, investigated, and monitored more carefully. NYS local level education institutions would not suffer from the ramifications of racist and hate based enforced leadership. NYS equal protection laws would be prioritized, monitored and enforced in an orderly manner as opposed to being enforced in a documented apartheid manner. NYSUT will no longer be enjoined in hate crime enforcement to cover Adam Urbanski’s revenge. Jonathan Lippman and Adam Urbanski would taste the monetary ramifications of their authenticated disguised killing programs. NYS government would function in a somewhat Godly manner as opposed to dark force led secret society phenomenon mode. Jonathan Lippman and Adam Urbanski have been deceived. Believing is seeing. This earth belongs to God and as such their deception has been exposed and must be stopped. Their easy access to the above must be restrained, regulated and dismantled on behalf of public safety and education. NYS government and Africa have suffered from the influence of the above documented dual life enforced deadly eugenic program authors and apartheid system master minders and enforcers. The unregulated and unaccounted money is the direct reason the documented millions of social phenomenon deaths have occurred and innocent qualified top educators are dead under the similar social phenomenon. The unregulated, unaccounted, public money has deceived these two characters into thinking they can maliciously control, kill, and enforce hate crimes through out NYS and nationwide without penalty or question, systematically, and under the Can You Prove It phenomenon. What was done in Africa is being replicated in the United States of America, in a smaller capacity, targeting innocent qualified people, some holding top education and or legal positions. These crimes must, should have been stopped and can be stopped via taking away the easy access to the deadly pathogens and money. In closing, it is clear that Adam Urbanski and Jonathan Lippman want me silenced and killed under disguise. They are using and have enjoined every aspect of government to subterfuge the above and the documents which substantiate the above. To this end, on behalf of education and public safety, I am asking BMCC, the union, law departments, and educators to do what they can to stop these bonafide well documented education hate crimes and racism, as well as end dual life conflict of interest public leadership positions, that directly obstruct education and make way for death traps. Moreover, I ask each to read my warning letter to Saundra Feldman and ask: How did I know two years prior to her death that she would be killed under a medical phenomenon? I am not a psychic. I am a child of God. This is real. The deadly Adam Urbanski and Jonathan Lippman Can You Prove It Education hate crime Phonomena can be stopped. Ms. Brookes must be made to tell who directed her to enforce the documented SYNDER code or penalize her for administering the documented attached SYNDER code hate crime as a means of program operation. The unraveling can be stopped. NYS government and lawyers have the power to end this documented deadly organized crime ring destroying human rights, education and humanity as a whole. They must be stopped before another innocent person is killed from the above documented hate crime enforcement and disguised killer programs. I have done my share to undisguise these programs on behalf of human life. The documented deadly social phenomenon is not good for Africa and it was not good for the educators who have died under this same patterned documented social phonomena, premised off of Can You Prove It! I thank God for life and the ability to write my testimony in a sound mind, and above all with the authority of being a child of God. Whether I am working or not the enforced hate crimes must stop. God placed me in here for a reason. I did not ask for the enforced hate crimes again. In fact, I have done everything in my power to stop it. I pass the torch I can not do this alone. I ask that all be done to stop these documented hate based, abuse of power, vicious and malicious hate crimes and killings on behalf of human life, education and all the dead educators that died under the patterned Adam Urbanski and Jonathan Lippman documented Disguised killing operations/patterned phonomenon disregarded under man made Can You Prove It standards and exemplified in millions of innocent people victimized and killed under science and legal phonomena, that could have been prevented with enforced public and equal protections. Each educator I have identified was killed under a medical phenomenon immediately after encountering and or engaging with one of these crime ring members via the union and or the judiciary. Mr. Keefe, the Hempstead union president is a case in point. He was not in the condition he is in now prior to this crime ring’ settlement which he took fault for the crimes Urbanski and Lippman ordered. They promoted him to quiet him and it would be too obvious if Keefe and Gallinson each died under a phenomenon immediately after settling the crime ring’s case. Consequently, they have decided to promote him while he is dependent on medical care which Jonathan Lippman has the contacts to control. I thank God that in God’s time, not mine, the world will see that each public education hate crime enforced and documented, coupled with the death rates and deaths documented, have been committed under the disguise of social phenomena, and could have and should have been prevented, on behalf of human life, public education and safety. In closing, please note, that Noel Cohen’s letters dated September 7, 2001 and the other letter dated January 6, 2003 are both under the Can you prove it phonomena. His signatures epitomize this. Noel Cohen’s letters are additional phonomena that have cause me great suffrage and damage. The letters boldly, proudly and in an above the law manner, facilitated and confirmed multiple lawless income executions that were initiated via the SYNDER code phenomenon. If small phenomena like this, is not regulated, and restrained unfortunately, and based on the death rate patterns I have documented, more innocent people will be executed under the disguise of a multitude of social phenomenon. I would stop allowing a phonomenon to use NYSUT letterhead and paper work for hate crime enforcement and confirmation. Finally, I thank God for life and the ability to write my testimony in a sound mind, and above all with the authority of being a child of God. I thank God for each God fearing person reading this. I will forward the certified US mail receipts via email after I mail the documents with evidence to this office. Thank you. Sincerely, Miriam Snyder Attached:1. Two BMCC SYNDER Coded Documents: Documented Enforced Public Education Hate Crime Phenomena 2.Hempstead Public Schools documented SYNDER Coded Public Education Hate Crime Initiation Enforcement Documentation Phenomena /legal Wonderment 3.Public Education Hate Crime Enforcement SYNDER Code initiated, Attempted Murder acknowledgement/settlement 4.NYSUT letters acknowledging and confirming SYNDER coded hate crime enforcement and legal phenomena that kills under disguise. 5.Letter to Saundra Feldman warning her of a potential death by disguise and design by the above perpetrator that worked with her, dated October 30, 2003. Xc: Alberto Gonzalez, Attorney General Honorable Chief Judge Judith Kaye Maxine Waters, Committee on the Judiciary Rose Gill Hearn, Commissioner Antonio Perez, President of Borough of Manhattan Community College Senator Schumer Mayor Bloomberg and Betsy Gotbaum, NYC Public Advocate BMCC’S PHENOMENON LIKE WALKER’S CASE BOTH EFFECTUATED AN EXECUTION OF EMPLOYMENT DUE TO ORHANIZED HATE CRIME INFLICTION DISGUISED AS PHENOMENA. ________________________________________________________________ IN THE BELOW LAW SUIT YOU WILL SEE THE ORGANIZED HATE CRIME ADMINISTRATION IN THE USE OF A SYNDER CODE THAT GUARANTEES AND PRIORITIZES ENFORCED ORGANIZED HATE CRIME, SPECIFICALLY, THE RETARDATION OF ALL LEGAL PROTECTION LAWS. THE SYNDER NAME ERRUPTED ON JUDICIAL PAPERS VIA JONATHAN LIPPMAN DOCUMENTED PATTERNED AND PRACTICED LAWLESS USURPATIONS EFFECTUATING ANOTHER VINDICTIVE, ORGANIZED, HATE CRIME RUTHLESS, STATUTORY TENURE OBSTRUCTION AND LAWLESS INCOME EXECUTION. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -------------------------------------------X ORDER MIRIAM SYNDER C V-02 CV472 JS (ETB) RECEIVED MARCH-6 2002 PRO SE OFFICE Plaintiff, -against- HEMPSTEAD PUBLIC SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL Defendant(s) ----------------------------------------X The above-captioned case has been referred to E. Thomas Boyle, Magistrate Judge, for purposes of scheduling discovery, resolutions of discovery disputes, settlement conferences and any other purposes set forth at 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(l)(A). An initial scheduling conference will be held in this case at 10:00 a.m. on MAY 2, 2002 before Judge Boyle in Courtroom 830, Long Island Federal Courthouse, Central Islip, New York. All counsel must be present unless excused by the court. Counsel for plaintiff(s) is obligated to serve a copy of this order on each defendant. COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF (S) OR PLAINTIFF PRO SE IS OBLIGATED TO SERVE A COPY OF THIS ORDER ON EACH DEFENDANT. _______________________________________________________________ THE SYNDER NAME AT THE JUDICIARY LEVEL! JONATHAN LIPPMAN HAS NO REGARD FOR LAW OR ANYTHING. HIS LEGAL PHENOMENA AND CAN YOU PROVE IT DISGUISED OPERATIONS WILL EXPLOIT AND UNRAVEL IN GOD’S TIME. SYNDER NAME IS A JONATHAN LIPPMAN AND EUGENIC BUDDIES CODE FOR A DISGUISED KILLING VIA EXTERMINATION OF INCOME AND NO JUSTTCE IN THE COURTS. U.S EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION New York District Office 201 Varick Street, Suite 1009 New York, New York 10014 Phone: (212) 741-8815 TDD: (212) 741-3080 General Fax: 212 741-2783 Legal FAX: (212) 620-0070 Charge Number: 16G-AO-3729. Charging Party: Miriam Synder Respondent: Hempstead Public High School Dear Sir/Madam. The Commission has received your request for a Notice of Right to Sue in the above reference charge. Your request has been forwarded to the U. S. Department of Justice for action. That agency will act on your request as soon as possible and issue the Notice directly to you within 2 to 4 weeks. Chief Employment Litigation Section Civil Rights Division Department of Justice Washington, D.C. 20530 Enclosed please find the fact sheet for filing a suit in Federal District Court. If you have any questions, please call me at the above telephone number. ________________________________________________________________ THE SYNDER NAME IS A JONATHAN LIPPMAN AND EUGENIC BUDDIES CODE FOR A DISGUISED KILLING VIA ENFORCED LAWLESS USURPED, HAVOC, TO GROSS INTERNAL HARRASSMENT, TO MULTIPLE LAWLESS EXTERMINATION OF INCOME AND NO JUSTTCE IN THE COURTS. THE BELOW IS THE DOCUMENTED INITIATION OF ORGANIZED HATE CRIME ADMINISTRATION VIA ENFORCEMENT OF A CODE TITLED THE INFLICTED LAWLESS SYNDER CODE. THIS CODE IS IMPLEMENTED VIA LAWLESS USURPATIONS AND CARRIES A MAGNITUDE OF PRIORITIZED LAWLESSNESS THAT IS UNEXPLAINABLE. THE SYNDER CODE IS A CODE USED TO KILL UNDER THE DISGUISE OF PHENOMENA. PLEASE NOTE MY NAME IS MIRIAM SNYDER AND WAS RESPECTED AS SUCH FOR TWO YEARS. OUT OF THIN AIR THE SYNDER CODE WAS USED TO TURN THE SCHOOL DISTRICT UPSIDE DOWN VIA WILLIE LYNCH MANAGEMENT AND HATE CRIME ENFORCEMENT. HEMPSTEAD NEW YORK HEMPSTEAD CLASSROOM TEACHERS ASSOCIATION 9/14/99 Proposal Between Miriam Synder and the District 1. The District shall place Ms. Synder on a fully paid administrative leave for the remainder of the 1999-2000 school year. 2. Ms. Synder shall receive any and all benefits and emoluments due her as an employee of the School District and as a member of the Teachers' Bargaining unit through June 30,2000. 3. The District will supply Ms. Synder with a letter of Recommendation. I. The District shall supply Ms. Synder 50% of her 1999-2000 school year salary, minus any payments already received, on the first payday after the execution of this document. 5. The District shall pay Ms. Synder the remaining 50% of her 1999 - 2000 school year Salary on the first pay date in February 2000. 6. Ms. Synder will resign from the District effective at the close of business on June 30, 2000. THE SYNDER NAME IS A JONATHAN LIPPMAN AND EUGENIC BUDDIES CODE FOR A DISGUISED KILLING VIA ENFORCED HAVOC RESULTING IN RUTHLESS AND LAWLESS EXTERMINATION OF INCOME AND NO JUSTTCE IN THE COURTS. THIS IS ORGANIZED CRIME AT ITS BEST. WHY? BECAUSE JONATHAN LIPPMAN WANTS ME DEAD BECAUSE I KNOW HIS CAN YOU PROVE IT DISGUISED KILLER OPERATIONS INSIDE OUT BECAUSE HE TRIED TO HAVE ME KILLED UNDER DISGUISE SEVERAL TIMES. HE WANTS TO CONTINUE DISGUISING HIS KILLINGS. SO IT CAN LOOK LIKE, OH SHE COULD NOT KEEP A JOB AND WENT CRAZY AND DIED. OF COURSE WITH NO MONEY, YOU CAN NOT LIVE. BUT WITH GOD ON MY SIDE, I AM ALIVE AND WELL. LIPPMAN SERVES THE WRONG GOD. IF GOD WAS NOT REAL, I WOULD NOT BE HERE. ________________________________________________________________ TO ALL TO WHOM THESE PRESENTS SHALL COME OR MAY CONCERN, KNOW THAT MIRIAM SNYDER as RELEASOR, in consideration of the sum of Twelve Thousand One Hundred and Twenty-Five Dollars ($12,125.00), and the received fromsettlement agreement DAVID KEEFE and the HEMPSTEAD CLASSROOM TEACHERS' ASSOCIATION as RELEASEE, receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, releases and discharges DAVID KEEFEthe RELEASEE, RELEASEE'S heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns from all actions, causes of action, suits, debts, dues, sums of money, accounts, reckonings, bonds, bills, specialties, covenants, contracts, controversies, agreements, promises, variances, trespasses, damages, judgments, extents, executions, claims, and demands whatever, in law, admiralty or equity, which against the RELEASEE, the RELEASOR, RELEASOR'S heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns ever had, now have or hereafter can, shall or may, have for, upon, or by reason of any matter, cause or thing whatsoever from the beginning of the world to the day of the date of this RELEASE. This release Includes, but is not limited to, CV-04 -0472 and CV-02-3589, alleging as against David Keefe: (1) Violation of 42 U.S.C. 1964,) 198I, 1983, 1985 and 2000(d)(e); (2) Violation of the 1st, 4th, 5th, 6th, 8th, 9th, 13th, 14th, and 19th Constitutional Amendments; (3) Violation of 18 U.S.C. 241, 201, 209; (4) Violation of the Racketeer Influenced a Corrupt organizations Act (RlCO); (5) Defamation; 6. Libel; (7) Constitutional Tort; (8) Breach of contract; (9) Coercion; (10) Attempted Murder; (11) Slavery; (12) Violation of U.S. Black Codes; (13) Breach of Duty of Fair Representation; (14) Violation of Federal Law and/or any state law; (15) And all other claims or causes of action included therein. Whenever the text hereof requires, the use of singular number shall include the appropriate plural number as the text of the within instrument may require. This RELEASE may not be changed orally. In Witness whereof, the RELEASOR has hereunto set RELEASOR'S hand and seal on the day of In presence of MIRIAM SNYDER STATE OF New York COUNTY OF Suffolk on July 26, 2002 before me personally came Miriam Snyder, to me known, and known to me to be the individual described in, and who executed the foregoing RELEASE, and duly acknowledged to me that she executed the same. Notary Public, State of New York, Suffolk County _______________________________________________________________ Hempstead High School 201 President Street Hempstead, New York 11550 July 13, 2000 To Whom It May Concern: I have been privileged to know Miriam Snyder for the past 3 years. In that time she has served our school as a Curriculum Specialist for the Bi-Lingual ESL Department and worked directly under my supervision. It is my observation that she is very knowledgeable performing her duties eagerly and efficiently. She has an innovative spirit and infuses our staff with a wealth of new motivational activities that has encouraged greater learning and achievement by non-English speaking students. The students and staff members of Hempstead High School will certainly miss Ms. Snyder. It is without reservation that I recommend Ms. Miriam Snyder to you for employment. Sincerely, Assistant Principal ****PLEASE NOTE EXCELLENT WORK EFFECTUATED ANOTHER LAWLESS INCOME EXECUTION*** Hempstead High School 201 President Street Hempstead, New York 11550 5/14/98 EDA Professor Long Island University C.W. Post Campus Brookville, New York 11548 Dear Dr. Lester: The purpose of this letter is to inform you that Ms. Snyder has successfully completed over 450 hours of administrative work at Hempstead High School. She has coordinated and organized the ESL/Bilingual and second languages programs. She has worked above and beyond the call of duty and this is reflected in her work. She has accepted an additional assignment to help the school. She has developed an excellent rapport with students and staff and has been an asset to the overall educational community. I believe she will be a most effective administrator. Please feel free to contact me if further information is needed. Sincerely, Principal ****PLEASE NOTE EXCELLENT WORK EFFECTUATED ANOTHER LAWLESS INCOME EXECUTION** ADMINISTRATIVE INTERN SUMMATIVE EVALUATION FORM Miriam has done an excellent job in fulfilling her ESL/Bilingual responsibilities. Cooperating Administrator's Signature: College Supervisor’s Signature ****PLEASE NOTE EXCELLENT WORK EFFECTUATED ANOTHER LAWLESS INCOME EXECUTION*** Hempstead High School Peninsula Boulevard and President Street Hempstead, New York 11550 Ms. Miriam Snyder, Curriculum Specialist Dear Ms. Snyder: After careful consideration I have decided to resign my position as English Teacher with Hempstead High School effective February 4, 1998. While it is not my purpose in this letter to explore the factors I have considered, I do want you to know how valuable your support and counsel has been to both my students and me. My decision was in no way based on anything to do with Hempstead High School but rather on personal reasons. Since the RCT examination is so important to several of my students. I will continue in this concentration and will be happy to cooperate in any way that is beneficial to Hempstead High School. Again my sincere thanks for your support, professional and personal during the time I have been at Hempstead High School. Sincerely, Hempstead High School Teacher ****PLEASE NOTE EXCELLENT WORK EFFECTUATED ANOTHER LAWLESS INCOME EXECUTION*** SPRINGFIELD GARDENS-HIGH SCHOOL Board of Education @ City of New York 143-10 Springfield Blvd. Springfield Gardens, New York 11413 June 22, 2001 To Whom It May Concern: This letter shall serve as a commendation for outstanding work and volunteer services of Ms. Miriam Snyder. Reading Specialist at Springfield Gardens High School spring semester 2001. Ms. Snyder worked as a Reading Specialist and volunteer at the high school. In this capacity, she organized, implemented, designed and developed assessment and evaluation modules for the EDL Reading Program. She worked effectively with the entire school community. Her teaching, writing and administrative skills are commendable. Without reservation, I commend and recommend Ms. Snyder to you, as she seeks an administrative position and/or pursues a Doctorate Degree. Unfortunately the EDL Reading program was cut and there are no administrative openings in my building. Her performance and commitment to education are notable and commendable. Should further information be needed, please contact me. SINCERELY, ASSISTANT PRINCIPAL ****PLEASE NOTE EXCELLENT WORK EFFECTUATED ANOTHER LAWLESS INCOME EXECUTION*** SPRINGFIELD GARDENS-HIGH SCHOOL Board of Education @ City of New York 143-10 Springfield Blvd. Springfield Gardens, New York 11413 May 24, 2001 To Whom It May Concern: Ms. Snyder worked as a Reading Specialist at Springfield Garden High School for the spring 2001 Semester. She organized and coordinated the EDL Reading Strategies program. She supplemented the program with Standards Based literacy curriculum. She provided my office with weekly instructional and attendance data. She used and disseminated most appropriate educational research regarding facilitating and enhancing student achievement. Most Importantly, she developed an excellent rapport with the students, parents and staff. Her teaching, organizational and administrative skills are commendable. I believe she is an asset to any instructional program. I am saddened, that the program will be cut. It is my belief that Ms. Snyder is a most effective educator and administrator. Should further information be needed, please contact me at (718) 341-3033. Sincerely, Assistant Principal ****PLEASE NOTE EXCELLENT WORK EFFECTUATED ANOTHER LAWLESS INCOME EXECUTION*** NASSAU TECHnological Adult Learning Center 234 Glen Cove Road. (Glen Cove Road and Westbury Avenue) Carle Place. New York, 11514 1 February 2, 1998 Educational Leadership Administration Program C.W. Post College 720 Northern Boulevard Brookville, NY 11548 To Whom It May Concern: IT is my pleasure to recommend Ms. Miriam Snyder to your educational administration program. Ms. Snyder has been a member of the Nassau BOCES Adult Learning Center faculty for the past two years as a part-time adult educator. Ms. Snyder has demonstrated her professional skills as a teacher of adult learners, whereby her students have progressed consistently in their learning growth. Ms. Snyder has an excellent knowledge of the teaching process and is able to work in a partnership with her students. She maintains an energetic and creative learning environment. In addition, Ms. Snyder is an excellent colleague, working well with other members of the professional staff. She is responsible and dedicated and brings to the profession her talents and enthusiasm. If you require additional information, please call me. SINCERELY, PRINCIPAL A Division of the @ ****PLEASE NOTE EXCELLENT WORK EFFECTUATED NON RE HIRING*** STATE EDUCATION DEPARTMENT THE UNIVERSITY OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, ALBANY NEW YORK 12234 ROSEVELT U.F.S.D. RCVD February 21, 1997 Superintendents Office February 19, 1997 Dr. Will Singleton Superintendent of Schools Roosevelt Union Free School District 240 Denton Place Roosevelt, New York 11575 Dear Dr. Singleton: SECTION III COMMENDATIONS The ESL teacher at the Jr./Sr. High School has established a well-organized ESL program. The teacher has a very good command of second language and content-based ESL instructional methodologies appropriate to the linguistic and developmental needs of the LEP students. Materials are varied and appropriate. Some of her materials and methodologies could be of immense value to other staff throughout the district. The teacher should explain the goals and activities of the Newcomer Class in the description of the ESL Program, which she has prepared. ________________________________________________________________ Roosevelt Union Free School District July 1, 1997 To Whom It May Concern: Ms. Miriam Snyder has worked as an ESL teacher in the Roosevelt Public Schools during the 1996-97 school year. During that time, she restructured the program at the Junior-Senior High School. In addition, she developed a handbook for parents of Limited English Proficient students. She is a very caring, talented and creative teacher. Her room is always very attractively appointed with cultural posters, flags and students' work. Her room provides an atmosphere that exudes the positive types of environment conducive to learning. Students enjoy her classes. Ms. Snyder was commended by the State Education Department during their recent monitoring visit. They acknowledged that her work was of immense value to the Program. I highly recommend Ms. Snyder for the position she is seeking. Director of Funded Program ________________________________________________________________ LONG ISLAND BUSINESS INSTITUTE TO: Miriam Snyder FROM: Dr. Philip Stander, Academic Dean DATE: March 13, 2002 SUBJECT: Reference Form of February 26, '02 It was my pleasure to have completed the reference form on your behalf. It is one of the most positive and laudatory references that I have completed. It truly and sincerely reflected my view of you as an excellent teacher and an asset to our evening session. As I had written in the reference, "Ms. Snyder is an intelligent highly motivated teacher. She was formally observed in the classroom by the Associate Academic Dean who evaluated her and concluded that she is a caring, knowledgeable teacher. I recommend her highly and without qualification. Best wishes for a gratifying semester ahead. I look forward to seeing you at our next faculty meeting. ****PLEASE NOTE EXCELLENT WORK EFFECTUATED ANOTHER LAWLESS INCOME EXECUTION PLEASE NOTE THAT THE SETTLEMENT CHECK CAME OUT OF JONATHAN LIPPMAN’S PHENOMENON, BUT CASHED. FOLLOW THE MONEY TRAIL. HE SET IT UP THAT THE ACCOUNT ON THE SETTLEMENT CHECK CAME FROM THE AMERICAN FEDERATION OF JONATHAN LIPPMAN PHENOMENA AND ABUSE OF JUDICIAL POWER. SEE THE CHECK. DESPITE THE SETTLEMENT CHECK BEING FUDGED IN TERMS OF WHERE THE MONEY CAME FROM, THE CHECK STILL CASHED BECAUSE JONATHAN LIPPMAN IS ADMINISTERING LYING WONDERS AND INJUSTICE IN AND OUT OF THE COURTS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. THE INSURANCE FRAUD MUST BE INVESTIGATED. THE EUGENIC LYING WONDERS EXECUTIVE BROTHERHOOD ADMINISTRATION HAS A LAWLESS DOMINO EFFECT. ONCE THE LEADERSHIP IS CORRUPTED, SATANIC AND GODLESS EVERYHTHING ELSE IS AND THOSE THAT ARE NOT, ARE TARGETED, PATICUALRLY IF THEY HAVE ENOUGH SENSE TO UNRAVEL THIS CORRUPTION AND LANDING AT THE SEED.
- Homepage
- 2016 CRIMINAL REPORTS
- PRAYER WARRIORS NEEDED!
- GOOD HEALTH
- MYRA SNYDER SCOTT KILED
- JOB MOBBING/KILL
- BOYDEN GRAY
- J. LIPPMAN
- A. URBANSKI
- CONGRESS
- LEGAL MINDS
- DEBT COLLECTION
- VIDEOS
- CONTERACT SLANDER
- NEWS/CRIMES
- VACCINE EXEMPTIONLETTER
- TI JOB NETWORK
- END ORGANIZED TALK
- SAVE CHILDREN
- 2013 LINKS 4 INVESTIGATION
- LAW
- REPLACED LINKS
- ATTEMPTED MURDERR
- DEMOCIDE
- EDUCATION
- STALKING
- PRESS RELEASES $ LEGAL
- GALLERIA
- VISION
- BOYDEN NYS CRIMES
- BOYDEN JUDGE KILLINGS
- NYS CRIME VICTIM
- EUGENICS
- STORE
- CRIMINAL RPT LINKS
- WILLIE
- PRAYER
- INDUCED SEIZURES
- MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS
- THE CURSE
- BOYDEN KILL PROJECTS
- POLICE REPORT 08
- BOYDEN DUPE
- EVIDENCE
- 18 USC 241
- LEGISLATION
- DIARY
- RESUME
- FLYER
- MONEY TRAIL
- BOYDEN II
- BOYDENIII
- BOYDEN IV
- UPDATE
- BLACKLISTINGS
- BOYDEN WTO
- AUG. 2007
- DONATE
- ECONOMIC CRIMES
- OLD POLICE RPTS
- LIABILITY
,